DNA-based species detection capabilities using laser transmission spectroscopy

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 10, Issue 78, 2013, Pages

  Mahon, A R ^a   Barnes, M A ^b   Li, F ^b   Egan, S P ^b   Tanner, C E ^b   Ruggiero, S T ^b   Feder, J L ^b   Lodge, D M ^b  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Ballast; DNA detection; Dreissena; Invasive species; Laser transmission spectroscopy; Polymerase chain reaction

Indexed keywords

BALLAST (RAILROAD TRACK); BIOCONTROL; DNA; LASERS; NANOPARTICLES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYSTYRENES; PROBES;

DETECTION CAPABILITY; DETECTION LIMITS; DNA CONCENTRATION; DNA DETECTION; DNA FRAGMENT; DREISSENA; DREISSENA BUGENSIS; ECONOMIC DAMAGES; FIELD APPLICATION; FUNCTIONALIZED; FUNCTIONALIZED NANOPARTICLES; GENOMIC DNA; INVASIVE SPECIES; LASER TRANSMISSION; MIXED SAMPLES; MULTI-SPECIES; NANOBEADS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBES; QUAGGA MUSSELS; SENSITIVE TECHNIQUES; TARGET SPECIES;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

GENOMIC DNA; NANOPARTICLE; DNA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBE; POLYSTYRENE DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DNA DETERMINATION; DREISSENA; DREISSENA BUGENSIS; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENOMICS; HYBRIDIZATION; LASER TRANSMISSION SPECTROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SPECTROSCOPY; ANIMAL; BIVALVE; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBE; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; BIVALVIA; DNA; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; NANOPARTICLES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBES; POLYSTYRENES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84871287057     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0637     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Carlton JT, Ruiz GM. 2005 The magnitude and consequences of bioinvasions in marine ecosystems: implications for conservation biology. In Marine conservation biology: the science of maintaining the sea's biodiversity (eds EA Norse, LB Crowder), pp. 123-148. Washington, DC: Island Press.
2. Rilov G, Crooks J. 2009 Biological invasions in marine ecosystems: ecological, management, and geographic perspectives. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
3. Strayer DLL. 2010 Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshw. Biol. 55, 152-174. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02380.x)
4. Ricciardi A. 2007 Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change. Conserv. Biol. 21, 329-336. (doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006. 00615.x)
5. Bossenbroek J, Finnoff D, Shogren JF. 2009 Advances in ecological and economical analysis of invasive species: dreisssenid mussels as a case study. In Bioeconomics of invasive species: integrating ecology, economics, and management (eds RP Keller, DM Lodge, JF Shogren, MA Lewis), pp. 244-265. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6. Pejchar L, Mooney HA. 2009 Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 497-504. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016)
7. Darling JA, Mahon AR. 2011 From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. Environ. Res. 111, 978-988. (doi:10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.001)
8. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2005 Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52, 273-288. (doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002)
9. Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Lewis MA, Lamberti G. 2002 An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2407-2413. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2179)
10. Mills EL, Dermott RM, Roseman E, Dustin D, Mellina E, Conn DB, Spidle A. 1993 Colonization, ecology, and population-structure of the Quagga mussel (Bivalvia, Dreissenidae) in the Lower Great-Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 2305-2314. (doi:10.1139/f93-255)
11. Ricciardi A. 2006 Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity. Divers. Distrib. 12, 425-433. (doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00262.x)
12. O'Neill Jr C. 1997 Economic impact of zebra mussels: results of the 1995 national zebra mussel information clearinghouse study. Great Lakes Res. Rev. 3, 35-42.
13. Anderson LWJ. 2005 California's reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: a model for invasive species rapid response. Biol. Invasions 7, 1003-1016. (doi:10.1007/s10530-004-3123-z)
14. Wimbush J, Frischer M, Zarzynski J. 2009 Eradication of colonizing populations of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) by early detection and SCUBA removal: Lake George, NY. Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 19, 703-713. (doi:10.1002/aqc.1052)
15. Darling JA, Blum MJ. 2007 DNA-based methods for monitoring invasive species: a review and prospectus. Biol. Invasions 9, 751-765. (doi:10.1007/s10530-006-9079-4)
16. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM. 2011 'Sight-unseen' detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conserv. Lett. 4, 150-157. (doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00158.x)
17. Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hänni C. 2005 Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol. 23, 359-366. (doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.05.006)
18. Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Takahara T, Honjo MN, Kawabata Z. 2011 Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology 13, 193-197. (doi:10.1007/s10201-011-0362-4)
19. Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP. 2011 Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using rocky mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS ONE 6, e22746. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0022746.t002)
20. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MTP, Orlando L, Willerslev E. 2012 Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2565-2573. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X. 2011.05418.x)
21. Lodge DM, Turner CR, Jerde CL, Barnes MA, Chadderton WL, Egan SP, Feder JL, Mahon AR, Pfrender ME. 2012 Perspective: conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2555-2558. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05600.x)
22. Senapati S, Mahon AR, Gordon J, Nowak C, Sengupta S, Powell THQ, Feder JL, Lodge DM, Chang H-C. 2009 Rapid on-chip genetic detection microfluidic platform for real world applications. Biomicrofluidics 3, 022407. (doi:10.1063/1.3127142)
23. Mahon AR, Barnes MA, Senapati S, Feder JL, Darling JA, Chang H-C, Lodge DM. 2011 Molecular detection of invasive species in heterogeneous mixtures using a microfluidic carbon nanotube platform. PLoS ONE 6, e17280. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017280.t002)
24. Basuray S, Senapati S, Aijian A, Mahon AR, Chang H-C. 2009 Shear and AC field enhanced carbon nanotube impedance assay for rapid, sensitive, and mismatch-discriminating DNA hybridization. ACS Nano 3, 1823-1830. (doi:10.1021/nn9004632)
25. Li F, Schafer R, Hwang C-T, Tanner CE, Ruggiero ST. 2010 High-precision sizing of nanoparticles by laser transmission spectroscopy. Appl. Optics 49, 6602-6611. (doi:10.1364/AO.49.006602)
26. Li F, Mahon AR, Barnes MA, Feder JL, Lodge DM, Hwang C-T, Schafer R, Ruggiero ST, Tanner CE. 2011 Quantitative and rapid DNA detection by laser transmission spectroscopy. PLoS ONE 6, e29224. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0029224.t002)
27. Rivetti C, Codeluppi S. 2001 Accurate length determination of DNA molecules visualized by atomic force microscopy: evidence for a partial B- to A-form transition on mica. Ultramicroscopy 87, 55-66. (doi:10.1016/S0304- 3991(00)00064-4)
28. Hughes M. 2003 Nanoelectromechanics in engineering and biology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
29. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek RC. 1994 DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 294-299.
30. Choi KH, Kimmerer W, Smith G, Ruiz GM, Lion K. 2005 Post-exchange zooplankton in ballast water of ships entering the San Francisco Estuary. J. Plankton Res. 27, 707-714. (doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi044)
31. Teletchea F. 2009 Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 19, 265-293. (doi:10.1007/s11160-009-9107-4)
32. Duggan I, van Overdijk C, Bailey S, Jenkins P, Limen H, MacIsaac HJ. 2005 Invertebrates associated with residual ballast water and sediments of cargo-carrying ships entering the Great Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 2463-2474. (doi:10.1139/F05-160)
33. Drake JM, Lodge DM. 2004 Global hot spots of biological invasions: evaluating options for ballast-water management. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 575-580. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2629)
34. Drake J, Lodge D. 2007 Hull fouling is a risk factor for intercontinental species exchange in aquatic ecosystems. AI 2, 121-131.
35. Drake JM, Lodge DM. 2007 Rate of species introductions in the Great Lakes via ships' ballast water and sediments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 530-538. (doi:10.1139/f07-029)
36. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2011 Efficacy of ballast water treatment systems. EPA Science Advisory Board Technical Report no. EPA-SAB-11-009. Washington, DC: EPA.