Enhanced proton treatment in mouse tumors through proton irradiated nanoradiator effects on metallic nanoparticles

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 8309-8323

  Kim, Jong Ki ^a   Seo, Seung Jun ^a   Kim, Hong Tae ^a   Kim, Ki Hong ^a   Chung, Myung Hwan ^b   Kim, Kye Ryung ^b   Ye, Sung Jun ^c  

^a Catholic University of Daegu   (South Korea)

^b Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAGG PEAKS; CHARACTERISTIC X RAYS; CONTROL-CELL; DOSE-DEPENDENT; DRUG CONCENTRATION; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; METALLIC NANOPARTICLES; MOUSE TUMORS; PROTON DOSE; PROTON TREATMENT; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; SECONDARY ELECTRONS; SECONDARY RADIATIONS; SINGLE-DOSE; THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION; TUMOR DOSE; TUMOR REGRESSION; TUMOR VOLUMES;

DRUG DOSAGE; MAMMALS; NANOPARTICLES; PROTON IRRADIATION; TUMORS;

PROTONS;

METAL NANOPARTICLE; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; COLON TUMOR; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; PARTICLE SIZE; PATHOLOGY; PROTON THERAPY; RADIATION RESPONSE; TIME; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CELL LINE, TUMOR; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; PARTICLE SIZE; PROTON THERAPY; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84871226658     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/24/8309     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baluchamy S, Ravichandran P, Periyakaruppan A, Ramesh V, Hall J C, Zhang Y, Jejelowo O, Gridley D S, Wu H and Ramesh G T 2010 Induction of cell death through alteration of oxidants and antioxidants in lung epithelial cells exposed to high energy protons J. Biol. Chem. 285 24769-74
2. Belkić D 2010 Review of theories on ionization in fast ion-atom collisions with prospects for application to hadron therapy J. Math. Chem. 47 1366-419
3. Brigger I, Dubernet C and Couvreur P 2002 Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 54 631-51
4. Brown A and Suit H 2004 The centenary of the discovery of the Bragg peak Radiother. Oncol. 73 265-8
5. Carter J D, Cheng N N, Qu Y, Suarez G D and Guo T 2007 Nanoscale energy deposition by X-ray absorbing nanostructures J. Phys. Chem. B 111 11622-5
6. Chang M Y, Shiau A L, Chen Y H, Chang C J, Chen H H W and Wu C L 2008 Increased apoptotic potential and dose-enhancing effect of gold nanoparticles in combination with single-dose clinical electron beams on tumor-bearing mice Cancer Sci. 99 1479-84
7. Goitein M 2008 Radiation Oncology: A Physicist's-Eye View (New York: Springer)
8. Govil I M 2001 Proton induced X-ray emission-a tool for non-destructive trace element analysis Curr. Sci. 80 1542-9
9. Kim J-K, Seo S-J, Kim K-H, Kim T-J, Chung M-H, Kim K-R and Yang T-K 2010 Therapeutic application of metallic nanoparticles combined with particle-induced x-ray emission effect Nanotechnology 21 425102
10. Kobayashi K, Usami N, Porcel E, Lacombe S and Le Sech C 2010 Enhancement of radiation effect by heavy elements Mutat. Res. 704 123-32
11. Lapicki G 2002 The status of theoretical L-subshell ionization cross sections for protons Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 189 8-20
12. Lapicki G 2005 The status of theoretical K-shell ionization cross sections by protons X-Ray Spectrom. 34 269-78
13. Miloshevsky G V, Tolkach V I, Shani G and Rozin S 2002 Calculated gadolinium atomic electron energy levels and Auger electron emission probability as a function of atomic number Z Nucl. Instrum. Methods: Phys. Res. B 192 360-4
14. Murillo T P, Sandquist C, Jacobs J M, Nesbit G, Manninger S and Neuwelt E A 2005 Imaging brain tumors with ferumoxtran-10 a nanoparticle magnetic resonance contrast agent Therapy 2 871-82
15. Park J-A, Kim H-K, Kim J-H, Jeong S-W, Jung J-C, Lee G-H, Lee J M, Chang Y and Kim T-J 2010 Gold nanoparticles functionalized by gadolinium-DTPA conjugate of cysteine as a multimodal bioimaging agent Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 2287-9
16. Park S-I, Lim J-H, Hwang Y-H, Kim J-H, Kim C-G and Kim C-O 2007 In vivo and in vitro antitumor activity of doxorubicin-loaded magnetic fluid Phys Status Solidi C 4 4345-51
17. Polf J C, Bronk L F, Driessen W H P, Arap W, Pasqualini R and Gillin M 2011 Enhanced relative biological effectiveness of proton radiotherapy in tumor cells with internalized gold nanoparticles Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 193702
18. Porcel E, Liehn S, Remita H, Usami N, Kobayashi K, Furusawa Y, Le Sech C and Lacombe S 2010 Platinum nanoparticles: a promising material for future cancer therapy? Nanotechnology 21 085103
19. Pradhan A K, Nahar S N, Montenegro M, Yu Y, Zhang H L, Sur C, Mrozik M and Pitzer R M 2009 Resonant X-ray enhancement of the Auger effect in high-Z atoms, molecules, and nanoparticles: potential biomedical applications J. Phys. Chem. A 113 12356-63
20. Stolterfoht N 1988 Electronic process in ion-atom collisions (Lecture Notes in Physics vol 294) ed D Berényi and G Hock (Berlin: Springer) pp 3-36
21. Tandon P N and Tribed I L C 2000 Atomic processes associated with heavy ion collision at large impact velocities probed via x-ray emission Proc. Ind. Nat. Sci. Acad.: PINSA 66A 629-51
22. Terakawa A et al 2011 PIXE analysis of a murine solid tumor treated with proton therapy combined with cisplatin X-ray Spectrom. 40 198-201