Past and future directions in content area literacies

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 275-278

  Bean, Tom ^a   O'brien, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871222759     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/JAAL.00138     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Beach, R., Hull, G., & O'Brien, G. (2011). Transforming English language arts in a Web 2.0 world. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 161-167). New York: Routledge.
2. Bean, T., & Zulich, J. (1992). A case study of three preservice teachers' beliefs about content area reading through the window of student-professor dialogue journals. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives (pp. 463-474). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
3. Dillon, D.R., O'Brien, D.G., Sato, M., & Kelly, C.M. (2010). Professional development and teacher education for reading instruction. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P. Af f lerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 629-660). New York: Routledge.
4. Dunkerly, J., Bean, T., & Putney, L. (2012). Employing global literature and cosmopolitan critical literacy with middle school students. Conference proposal submitted to the Literacy Research Association.
5. Harper, H., Bean, T., & Dunkerly, J. (2010). Cosmopolitanism, globalization, and the field of adolescent literacy. Canadian and International Education/Education Canadienne et Internationale, 39(3), 1-13.
6. Hull, G.A., & Stornaiulo, A. (2010). Literate arts in a global world: Reframing social networking as cosmopolitan practice. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(2), 85-97. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.2.1
7. Jetton, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). Adolescent literacy in the academic disciplines: General principles and practical strategies. New York: Guilford.
8. Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D., & Barr, R. (2000). Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: rbaum.
9. McCormick, J. (2011). Transmediation in the language arts classroom: Creating contexts for analysis and ambiguity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(8), 579-587. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.8.3
10. Moje, E.B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96-107. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1
11. O'Brien, D.G. (2012). Struggling adolescents' engagement in multimediating: Countering the institutional construction of incompetence. In D.E. Alvermann & K.A. Hinchman (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (3rd ed., pp. 71-91). New York: Routledge.
12. O'Brien, D.G., & Voss, S. (2011). Reading multimodally: What is afforded. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 75-78.
13. Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20(4), 455-475. doi:10.2307/1495082
14. Walker, N., Bean, T., & Dillard, B. (2010). When textbooks fall short: New ways, new texts, new sources of information in the content areas. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.