Public support for vigilantism: An experimental study

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 387-413

  Haas, Nicole E ^a   de Keijser, Jan W ^b   Bruinsma, Gerben J N ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF CRIME AND LAW ENFORCEMENT   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Confidence; Criminal justice system; Public support; Punishment; Vigilantism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871211985     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-012-9144-1     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Abrahams, R. (2002). Vigilantism, state jurisdiction and community morality: Control of crime and 'undesirable' behaviour when the state 'fails'. In I. Pardo (Ed.), Morals of legitimacy: Between agency and system (pp. 107-126). New York: Berghahn Books.
2. Adinkrah, M. (2005). Vigilante homicides in contemporary Ghana. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 413-427.
3. Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 368-378.
4. Allen, J., Edmonds, S., Patterson, A., & Smith, D. (2006). Policing and the criminal justice system-public confidence and perceptions: findings from the 2004/05 British Crime Survey (Online report 07/06). London: Home Office.
5. Alvarez, A., & Bachman, R. (2007). Mob violence. Violence. The enduring problem (pp. 211-236). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
6. Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Turner, M. G., & Sundt, J. L. (1996). Assessing public support for three-strikes-and-you're-out laws: global versus specific attitudes. Crime & Delinquency, 42(4), 517-534.
7. Ayyildiz, E. (1995). When battered woman's syndrome does not go far enough: the battered woman as vigilante. Journal of Gender and the Law, 4(141), 141-166.
8. Baker, B. (2001). Taking the law into their own hands: Fighting crime in South Africa. Paper presented at the ECPR, Grenoble.
9. Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies: a comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421-438.
10. Benesh, S. C., & Howell, S. E. (2001). Confidence in the courts: a comparison of users and non-users. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 199-214.
11. Bieneck, S. (2009). How adequate is the vignette technique as a research tool for psycho-legal research? In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck, & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 255-271). Chichester: Wiley.
12. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 34-45.
13. Brown, R. M. (1975). Strain of violence. Historical studies of American violence and vigilantism. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Carlsmith, K. M. (2008). On justifying punishment: the discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21, 119-137.
15. Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(2), 284-299.
16. Coffee, J. C. (1991). Does "unlawful" mean "criminal"? Reflections on the disappearing tort/crime distinction in American law. Boston University Law Review, 71, 193-246.
17. Cohen, R. L. (1989). The legitimacy of vigilanteism. Brigham Young University Law Review, 4, 1261-1276.
18. Cooney, M. (1997). From warre to tyranny: lethal conflict and the state. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 316-338.
19. Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim's innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31-38.
20. Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Applegate, B. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Cullen, F. T., Mathers, R. A., Clark, G. A., & Cullen, J. B. (1983). Public support for punishing white-collar crime: Blaming the victim revisited? 11(6), 481-493.
22. Darley, J. M. (2001). Citizens' sense of justice and the legal system. Current directions in psychological science, 10(1), 10-13.
23. Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2000). Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24(6), 659-683.
24. Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 324-336.
25. De Keijser, J. W. (2001). Punishment and purpose: From moral theory to punishment in action. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
26. De Keijser, J. W., & Elffers, H. (2009). Cross-jurisdictional differences in punitive public attitudes? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1-2), 47-62.
27. De Keijser, J. W., van Koppen, P. J., & Elffers, H. (2007). Bridging the gap between judges and the public? A multi-method study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(2), 131-131.
28. Dumsday, T. (2009). On cheering Charles Bronson: the ethics of vigilantism. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 47(1), 49-68.
29. Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: a research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 337-348.
30. Freiburg, A. (2001). Affective versus effective justice. Instrumentalism and emotionalism in criminal justice. Punishment and Society, 3(2), 265-278.
31. Friedman, J. S., & Austin, W. (1978). Observers' reactions to an innocent victim: effects of characterological information and degree of suffering. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 4(4), 569-574.
32. Gardner, J. (1998). Crime: In proportion and in perspective. In A. Ashworth & M. Wasik (Eds.), Fundamentals of sentencing theory: Essays in honour of Andrew von Hirsch (pp. 31-52). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Goldberg, J. H., Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 781-795.
34. Goldstein, D. M. (2003). "In our own hands": Lynching, justice, and the law in Bolivia. American Ethnologist, 30(1), 22-43.
35. Greene, E. J., & Darley, J. M. (1998). Effects of necessary, sufficient, and indirect causation on judgments of criminal liability. Law and Human Behavior, 22(4), 429-451.
36. Haas, N. E. (2010). Public support for vigilantism. Leiden: Leiden University.
37. Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128-167.
38. Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Herian, M. N., Bornstein, B. H., & Neeley, E. M. (2011). Exploring separable components of institutional confidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29, 95-115.
39. Harnischfeger, J. (2003). The Bakassi Boys: fighting crime in Nigeria. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 41(1).
40. Haynes, G. A., & Olson, J. M. (2006). Coping with threats to just-world beliefs: derogate, blame, or help? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 664-682.
41. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
42. Heise, D. R. (1972). Employing nominal variables, induced variables, and block variables in path analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 1(147-173).
43. Herzog, S. (2006). Battered women who kill. An empirical analysis of public perceptions of seriousness in Israel from a consensus theory perspective. Homicide Studies, 10(4), 293-319.
44. Hine, K. D. (1998). Vigilantism revisited: an economic analysis of the law of extra-judicial self-help or why can't Dick shoot Henry for stealing Jane's truck? The American University law review, 47(5), 1221-1254.
45. Hoffman, M. L. (1990). Empathy and justice motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 151-172.
46. Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing, 4(3), 241-248.
47. Huggins, M. K. (1991). Vigilantism and the state in modern Latin America. New York: Praeger.
48. Hutton, N. (2005). Beyond populist punitiveness? Punishment and Society, 7(3), 243-258.
49. Jacoby, J. E., & Cullen, F. T. (1998). The structure of punishment norms: applying the Rossi-Berk model. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89(1), 245-312.
50. Johnson, D. (2009). Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies. Punishment and Society, 11(1), 51-66.
51. Johnston, L. (1996). What is vigilantism? British Journal of Criminology, 36(2), 220-236.
52. Joseph, J. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1983). Perceived responsibility and the least of evils principle. Law and Human Behavior, 7(1), 51-58.
53. Justiz und Selbstjustiz. (2008, March 2). Spiegel. Retrieved from http://einestages.spiegel.de/static/topicalbumbackground/1485/justiz_und_selbstjustiz.html.
54. Köpcke, M. (2006, March 6). Rache im Gerichtssaal. Deutschlandradio. Retrieved from http://www.dradio.de/dlf/sendungen/kalenderblatt/474050/.
55. Lenz, T. (1988). Republican virtue and the American vigilante. Legal Studies Forum, 12(2), 117-140.
56. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
57. Little, C. B., & Sheffield, C. P. (1983). Frontiers and criminal justice: English private prosecution agencies and American vigilantism in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. American Sociological Review, 48, 796-808.
58. Locke, J. (1689/1967). Two treatises of government. In Laslett (Ed.), Two treatises of government: A critical edition with an introduction and apparatus criticus (second ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Lodewijkx, H. F. M., Wildschut, T., Nijstad, B. A., Savenije, W., & Smit, M. (2001). In a violent world a just world makes sense: the case of 'senseless violence' in the Netherlands. Social Justice Research, 14(1), 79-94.
60. Luckenbill, D. F. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction. Social Problems, 25, 176-186.
61. MacCormick, N., & Garland, D. (1998). Sovereign states and vengeful victims: The problem of the right to punish. In A. Ashworth & M. Wasik (Eds.), Fundamentals of sentencing theory: Essays in honour of Andrew von Hirsch (pp. 11-29). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
62. Minnaar, A. (2001). The new vigilantism in Post-April 1994 South Africa: Crime prevention or an expression of lawlessness? Technikon: Institute for Human Rights & Criminal Justice Studies.
63. Peterson, B., Doty, R., & Winter, D. (1993). Authoritarianism and attitudes toward contemporary social issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2(19), 174-184.
64. Roberts, J. V., & Hough, M. (2005). Understanding public attitudes to criminal justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
65. Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (1997). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
66. Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. San Francisco: Westview Press.
67. Rosenbaum, H. J., & Sederberg, P. C. (1974). Vigilantism: an analysis of establishment violence. Comparative Politics, 6(4), 541-570.
68. Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (Eds.). (1982). Measuring social judgments. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
69. Rossi, P. H., Simpson, J. E., & Miller, J. L. (1985). Beyond crime seriousness: fitting the punishment to the crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1(1), 59-90.
70. Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. R. (1992). Introduction. In A. Sarat & T. R. Kearns (Eds.), Law's violence (pp. 1-21). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan's Press.
71. Schuller, R. A., & Hastings, P. A. (1996). Trials of battered women who kill: the impact of alternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20(2), 167-187.
72. Scott, E. S., Repucci, N. D., Antonishak, J., & DeGennaro, J. T. (2006). Public attitudes about the culpability and punishment of young offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24(6), 815-832.
73. Scherpenzeel, A., & Vis, C. (2010). Encouraging and maintaining participation in an Internet panel: Effects of letters, incentives and feedback. Paper presented at the Panel Survey Methods Workshop, University of Mannheim, Germany.
74. Scherpenzeel, A., & Zandvliet, R. (2010). Slapers en inactieven binnen online panels [Sleepers and inactive respondents in online panels]. In A. E. Bronner (Ed.), Ontwikkelingen in het marktonderzoek: Jaarboek MarktOnderzoekAssociatie (pp. 189-204). Haarlem: Spaar en Hout.
75. Shaw, M. E., & Sulzer, J. L. (1964). An empirical test of Heider's levels in attribution of responsibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(1), 39-46.
76. Shotland, R. L. (1976). Spontaneous vigilantism: a bystander response to criminal behavior. In H. J. Rosenbaum & P. C. Sederberg (Eds.), Vigilante Politics: University of Pennsylvania Press.
77. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. I. (1984). The role of bystanders in crime control. Journal of Social Issues, 40(1), 9-26.
78. Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. A. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 14(3), 305-326.
79. Skogan, W. G. (2009). Concern about crime and confidence in the police: reassurance or accountability? Police Quarterly, 12(3), 301-318.
80. Spencer, J. (2008). Foreword. In D. Pratten & A. Sen (Eds.), Global vigilantes (x-xii). New York: Colombia University Press.
81. St Amand, M. D., & Zamble, E. (2001). Impact of information about sentencing decisions on public attitudes toward the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 515-528.
82. Stylianou, S. (2003). Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: what have we learned and what else do we want to know. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 37-56.
83. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003a). Moral solidarity, identification with the community, and the importance of procedural justice: the police as prototypical representatives of a group's moral values. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 153-165.
84. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003b). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513-548.
85. Tankebe, J. (2009). Self-help, policing and procedural justice: Ghanaian vigilantism and the rule of law. Law & Society Review, 43(2), 245-270.
86. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
87. Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing law breakers. Law & Society Review, 31(2), 237-265.
88. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
89. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1997). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 595-629). New York: McGraw-Hill.
90. Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2009). Empathetic identification and punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology, 13(3), 283-312.
91. Vidmar, N. (2001). Retribution and revenge. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law.
92. Vitaglione, G. D., & Barnett, M. A. (2003). Assessing a new dimension of empathy: empathic anger as a predictor of helping and punishing desires. Motivation and Emotion, 27(4), 301-325.
93. Warr, M. (1989). What is the perceived seriousness of crimes? Criminology, 27(4), 795-821.
94. Weber, H. (2000). Emotional excesses as elements of the law. In J. Schlaeger (Ed.), Representations of emotional excess (Vol. 16, pp. 287-296). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
95. Weisburd, D. (1998). Vigilantism as community social control: developing a quantitative criminological model. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4(2), 137-153.
96. Zimring, F. E. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.