Citizens' sense of justice and the legal system

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 10-13

  Darley, John M ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Criminal responsibility; Justice; Legal decisions; Morality

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035587842     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00103     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. American Law Institute. (1962). Model Penal Code official draft, 1962. Philadelphia: Author.
2. Coffee, J.D. (1991). Does 'unlawful' mean 'criminal'? Reflections on the disappearing tort/ crime distinction in American law. Boston University Law Review, 71, 193-246.
3. Darley, J., Sanderson, C., & LaMantha, P. (1996). Community standards for defining attempt: Inconsistencies with the Model Penal Code. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 405-420.
4. Holmes, O.W., Jr. (1881). The common law. Boston: Little, Brown.
5. Macauley, T. (1837). A penal code prepared by the Indian law commissioners. Calcutta, India: Bengal Military Orphans Press.
6. Pound, R. (1907). The need of a sociological jurisprudence. Green Bag, 19, 607-615.
7. Robinson, P.H., & Darley, J.M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and criminal laws. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
8. Robinson, P.H., & Darley, J.M. (1998). Objective vs. subjectivist views of criminality: A study in the role of social science in criminal law theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 409-447.
9. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.