Covert Painting Simulations Influence Aesthetic Appreciation of Artworks

Psychological Science

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1479-1481

  Leder, Helmut ^a   Bär, Siegrun ^a   Topolinski, Sascha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871203733     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612452866     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Beilock S. L.,Holt L. E.Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system?.Psychological Science. 2007;18:51-57.
2. Calvo-Merino B.,Urgesi C.,Orgs G.,Aglioti S. M.,Haggard P.Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli.Experimental Brain Research. 2010;204:447-456.
3. Cupchik G. C.Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy. Cupchik G. C.Laszlo J., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1992:61-81.
4. Currie G.Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Coplan A.Goldie P., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2011:82-97.
5. Dutton D.The art instinct. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
6. Freedberg D.,Gallese V.Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11:197-203.
7. Leder H.,Belke B.,Oeberst A.,Augustin D.A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgements.British Journal of Psychology. 2004;95:489-508.
8. LeeV. (1913). The beautiful: An introduction to psychological aesthetics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26942/26942-h/26942-h.htm.
9. Lipps T.Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst. Hamburg, Germany: Verlag Leopold Voss; 1903:.
10. Paladino M. P.,Mazzurega M.,Pavani F.,Schubert T.Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self-other boundaries.Psychological Science. 2010;21:1202-1207.
11. ReberR.NorenzayanA. (2010). The shared fluency theory of social cohesiveness. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1702407.
12. Reber R.,Schwarz N.,Winkielman P.Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004;8:364-382.
13. Reed C. L.,Farah M. J.The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1995;21:334-343.
14. Taylor J. E. T.,Witt J. K.,Grimaldi P. J.Uncovering the connection between artist and audience: Viewing painted brushstrokes evokes corresponding action representations in the observer.Cognition. 2012;125:26-36.
15. Topolinski S.Moving the eye of the beholder: Motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference.Psychological Science. 2010;21:1220-1224.
16. Topolinski S.The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2012;141:260-281.
17. Topolinski S.,Strack F.Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2009;35:423-433.
18. Topolinski S.,Strack F.False fame prevented: Avoiding fluency effects without judgmental correction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;98:721-733.
19. Tucker M.,Ellis R.On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998;24:830-846.
20. Wilthermuth S. S.,Heath C.Synchrony and cooperation.Psychological Science. 2009;20:1-5.