Web 2.0 foresight for innovation policy: A case of strategic agenda setting in European innovation

Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 446-466

  Haegeman, Karel ^a   Cagnin, Cristiano ^a   Könnölä, Totti ^b   Collins, Doug ^c  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b Impetu Solutions Palacio de Miraflores   (Spain)

^c Spigit Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Community building; Innovation platforms; Innovation policy; Priority setting; Web 2.0 foresight

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871184014     PISSN: 14479338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.3.446     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Accenture. (2009). Web 2.0 and the next generation of public service. Retrieved from: http://www.accenture. com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture_ Public_Service_Web_2_dot_0_in_Public_Service_3. pdf. Accessed 8 June 2012.
2. Amanatidou, E., Cachia, R., Da Costa, O., Rotenberg, B., & Compañó, R. (2008). Web 2.0 can support the way of doing foresight. Poster presentation at the 2008 International Seville Conference on future-oriented technology analysis, 16-17 October 2008, Seville, Spain.
3. Amanatidou, E., Butter, M., Carabias, V., Könnölä, T., Leis, M., Saritas, O., van Rij, V. (2012). On concepts and methods in horizon scanning: Lessons from initiating policy dialogues on emerging issues. Science and Public Policy, 39, 208-221.
4. Anttiroiko, A. -V. (2010). Innovation in democratic e-governance: Benefitting from Web 2.0 applications in the public sector. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 6(2), 18-36.
5. Bjelland, O. M., & Wood, R. C. (2008). An inside view of IBM's 'Innovation Jam'. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 31-41.
6. Boden, M., Cagnin, C., Carabias, V., Haegeman, K., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Facing the future: Time for the EU to meet global challenges. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports (EUR 24364 EN). European Commission, Luxemberg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ publications/pub.cfm?id=3339. Accessed 8 June 2012.
7. Boden, M., Johnston, R., & Scapolo, F. (2012). The role of FTA in responding to grand challenges: A new approach for STI policy? Science and Public Policy, 39, 135-139.
8. Brummer, V., Könnölä, T., & Salo, A. (2008). Foresight within Era-Nets: Experiences from the preparation of an international research programme. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 483-495.
9. Bughin, J. (2007). How companies can make the most of user-generated content. McKinsey Quarterly, August, 1-4.
10. Cagnin, C. (2011). In Center for strategic studies and management (CGEE) - Foresight international seminar: From theory to practice, Ed. Tatiana de Carvalho Pires, pp. 37-53. Sala, Brazil: CGEE.
11. Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., & Keenan, M. (2012). Orienting European innovation systems towards grand challenges and the roles that FTA can play. Science and Public Policy, 39, 140-152.
12. Chui, M., Miller, A., & Roberts, R. P. (2009). Six ways to make Web 2.0 work. The McKinsey Quarterly, McKinsey and Company. Retrieved from: http://www.rachelcolic. com/documents/6%20Ways%20to%20Make%20 Web%202.0%20Work.pdf. Last accessed 8 June 2012.
13. Cinco, C., Novotny, K., & Girard, B. (2012). Impact 2.0 - New mechanisms for linking research and policy, Technical Guidelines (Version 2). Association for Progressive Communications and Fundación Comunica. Retrieved from: http://iguides.comunica.org/ images/3/3e/Impacto20_technical_guide.pdf. Last accessed 8 June 2012.
14. Cooke, M., & Buckley, N. (2008). Web 2.0, social networks and the future of market research. International Journal of Market Research, 50(2), 267-292.
15. Corrocher, N. (2011). The adoption of web 2.0 services: an empirical investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 547-558.
16. Da Costa, O., Cachia, R., Compañó, R., & Amanatidou, E. (2008). Using online social networks to look at the future. In H. L. Schneider & L. M. Huber (Eds.), Social networks: Development, evaluation and influence. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
17. EIT. (2011). EIT's Strategic Innovation Agenda (SIA). Investing in Innovation Beyond 2014. Retrieved from:http://eit.europa.eu/fileadmin/Content/Downloads/ SIA/EIT_Strategic_Innovation_Agenda_FINAL_-_ Copy.pdf. Last accessed 8 June 2012.
18. European Commission. (2011). Decision of the European parliament and of the council on the strategic innovation agenda of the European institute of innovation and technology (EIT): The contribution of the EIT to a more innovative Europe. COM(2011) 822 final. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/eit/docs/proposalfor-decision-sia_en.pdf. Last accessed 8 June 2012.
19. EIF. (2009). The Digital World in 2025, Indicators for European Action. Retrieved from: http://www. eifonline. org/site/download.cfm?SAVE=10820&LG=1. Last accessed 8 June 2012.
20. Gheorghiou, R., Curaj, A., Paunica, M., & Holeab, C. (2009). Web 2.0 and the emergence of future oriented communities. Economic Computing and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research Journal, 2, 117-128.
21. For-Learn. (2010). Online foresight guide, European foresight platform. www.foresight-platform.eu/ community/foresightguide/. Accessed 8 June 2012.
22. Glod, F., Duprel, C., & Keenan, M. (2009). Foresight for science and technology priority setting in a small country: The case of Luxembourg [Special issue: Impacts and implications of future-oriented technology analysis (FTA) for policy and decision-making]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(8), 933-951.
23. Haegeman, K., & Cagnin, C. (2011). Priority areas for the next waves of knowledge and innovation communities. Exploration of critical success factors, alternative options and characteristics for design (Technical Note: JRC65426). JRC-IPTS. European Commission, Luxemberg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: http://ipts.jrc. ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=4479. Last accessed 8 June 2012.
24. Holslag, J., & Doyle, D. H. (2010). The new global security landscape - 10 Recommendations from the 2010 Security Jam, Security & Defence Agenda, Geert Cami. Retrieved from: http://www.securitydefenceagenda.org/ Portals/14/Documents/Publications/2010/SecurityJam_ Report_2010.pdf. Last accessed 8 June 2012.
25. Könnölä, T., Salo., A., Cagnin, C., Carabias., V., & Vilkkumaa, E. (2012). Facing the future: Scanning, synthesizing and sense-making in horizon-scanning. Science and Public Policy, 39, 222-231.
26. McKinsey & Company. (2009). McKinsey global survey results: How companies are benefiting from Web 2.0. New York, NY: Author.
27. Miles, I, Harper, J. C., Georghiou, L., Keenan, M., & Popper, R. (2008). The many faces of foresight. In L. Georghiou, H. J. Cassingena, M. Keenan, I. Miles,& R. Popper (Eds.), The handbook of technology foresight: concepts and practice. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
28. Miller, L., & Williamson, A. (2008). Digital Dialogues, Third Phase Report: August 2007 - August 2008, report commissioned by the Ministry of Justice, Crown Copyright, Norwich. London, England: Hansard Society.
29. Nibbe, J. (2011). Next generation innovation policy: The future of EU innovation policy to support market growth. London, England: Ernst & Young in collaboration with CEPS, EYGM Limited.
30. Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in Government: Why and how. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports (EUR 23358 EN). European Commission, Luxemberg: Publications Office of the European Union.
31. Popper, R. (2008). Foresight methodology. In L. Georghiou, H. J. Cassingena, M. Keenan, I. Miles, & R. Popper (Eds.), The handbook of technology foresight: concepts and practice. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
32. Rathi, D., & Given, L. M. (2010). Research 2.0: A framework for qualitative and quantitative research in Web 2.0 environments. 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1-10.
33. Salo, A., Brummer, V., & Könnölä, T. (2009). Axes of balance in foresight - Reflections from FinnSight 2015 [Special issue on the 3rd International Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis]. Technological Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(8), 987-1001.
34. Schillewaert, N., De Ruyck, T., & Verhaeghe, A. (2009). Connected research: How market research can get the most out of semantic web waves. International Journal of Market Research, 51(1), 11-27.
35. Security Jam. (2012). The new global security landscape, 10 recommendations from the 2012 Security Jam, Security & Defence Agenda. Retrieved from: http://www.securitydefenceagenda.org/Portals/14/ Documents/Security_Jam/2012_Security_Jam_ Report_COMPLETE.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2012.
36. Townsend, T., & Tremblay J.-F. (2010). Canada@150, Public Works and Government Services Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.policyresearch.gc.ca/ doclib/can150_rp-eng.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2012.
37. Wallace, S., Ganesh, J., Kolhatkar, A., & Singh, R. (2011). Developing product innovation using Web 2.0: A field study. AMCIS 2011 Proceedings, Association for Information Systems Electronic Library (AISeL). Retrieved from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1262&context=amcis2011_submissions. Accessed 8 June 2012.