Foresight for science and technology priority setting in a small country: The case of Luxembourg

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 933-951

  Glod, Frank ^a   Duprel, Carlo ^a   Keenan, Michael ^b  

^a Fonds national de la recherche   (Luxembourg)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Foresight; Luxembourg; Priority setting; Research system

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; STAKEHOLDER; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

BELGIUM; LUXEMBOURG [BELGIUM];

EID: 74949128872     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537320903262298     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Crehan, P., and J. Cassingena-Harper. 2008. Technology foresight in smaller countries. In The handbook of technology foresight, eds. L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena-Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, and R. Popper, 216-36. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
2. FNR. 2006. FNR Foresight Baseline Report. Luxembourg: Fonds National de la Recherche (unpublished).
3. FNR. 2007a. FNR Foresight Final Report. National priorities for public research and other findings. Luxembourg: Fonds National de la Recherche.
4. FNR. 2007b. FNR Foresight Final Report. Thinking for the future today. Luxembourg: Fonds National de la Recherche.
5. Georghiou, L., and M. Keenan. 2006. Evaluating national technology foresight exercises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73: 761-77.
6. Glod, F., C. Duprel, and M. Keenan. 2006. Luxembourg Foresight - a 'standard' exercise in a 'peculiar' setting? Paper presented at the Second FTA Conference, 28-29 September, Sevilla, Spain.
7. Keenan, M. 2003. Identifying emerging generic technologies at the national level: the UK experience. Journal of Forecasting 22: 129-60.
8. Keenan, M., and I. Miles. 2008. Scoping and planning foresight. In The handbook of technology foresight, eds. L. Georghiou, J. Cassingena. Harper, M. Keenan, I. Miles, and R. Popper, 342-75. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. Meyer, M. 2008. The dynamics of science in a small country: the case of Luxembourg. Science and Public Policy 35, no. 5: 361-71.
10. OECD. 1991. Choosing priorities in science and technology. Paris: OECD. OECD. 2007. Reviews of innovation policy: Luxembourg. Paris: OECD.
11. Thorsteinsdottir, H. 2000. Public sector research in small countries: does size matter? Science and Public Policy 27, no. 6: 433-42.
12. Wehrmeyer, W., J. Chenoweth, A. Clayton, M. Fernandez-Lopez, and K. Lum. 2004. Foresighting and technology choice in small developing countries. In Paper presented at the EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting and Assessment Methods, 13-14 May, Sevilla, Spain.