What is needed to implement a computer-assisted health risk assessment tool? An exploratory concept mapping study

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Ahmad, Farah ^a,b,c   Norman, Cameron ^b,d   O'Campo, Patricia ^b,c  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d CENSE Research + Design   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; Computer assisted; Decision support; Psychosocial health; Qualitative; Risk assessment; Underserved urban population

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTERNET; MENTAL DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CANADA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICALLY UNDERSERVED AREA; MENTAL DISORDERS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84871143196     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-149     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. Feinstein AR, J Chronic Dis 1970 23 7 455 468 10.1016/0021-9681(70)90054-8
2. Threads and yarns: weaving the tapestry of comorbidity. Starfield B, Ann Fam Med 2006 4 2 101 103 10.1370/afm.524 16569711
3. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, Salisbury C, Roland M, Ann Fam Med 2009 7 357 363 10.1370/afm.983 19597174
4. Co-morbidity does not reflect complexity in internal medicine patients. Nardi R, Scanelli G, Corrao S, Iori I, Mathieu G, Amatrian RC, Euro J Intern Med 2007 18 359 368 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.05.002 (Pubitemid 47225044)
5. Adolescent sexual behaviour, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL, Technology Science 1998 280 867 873 (Pubitemid 28215590)
6. Computer-assisted self interviewing in sexual health clinics. Fairley CK, Sze JK, Vodstrcil LA, Chen MY, Sex Transm Dis 2010 37 11 665 668 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181f7d505 20975481
7. Breaking the barriers: the promise of computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence. Renker PR, J Midwifery Womens Health 2008 53 6 496 503 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.07.017 18984505
8. Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive issues: design and implementation of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing. Lessler JT, O'Reilly JM, NIDA Res Monogr 1997 167 366 382
9. Better health while you wait: a controlled trial of a computer based intervention for screening and health promotion in the emergency department. Rhodes KV, Lauderdale DS, Stocking CE, Howes DS, Roizen MF, Levinson W, Ann Emerg Med 2001 37 3 284 291 10.1067/mem.2001.110818 11223765 (Pubitemid 32204932)
10. «Between me and the computer»: increased detection of intimate partner violence using a computer questionnaire. Rhodes KV, Lauderdale DS, He T, Howes DS, Levinson W, Ann Emerg Med 2002 40 5 476 484 10.1067/mem.2002.127181 12399790 (Pubitemid 35231571)
11. Computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence and control: a randomised trial. Ahmad F, Hogg-Johnson S, Stewart DE, Skinner HA, Glazier RH, Levinson W, Ann Intern Med 2009 151 2 93 102 19487706
12. Lowering the threshold for discussions of domestic violence: a randomized controlled trial of computer screening. Rhodes KV, Drum M, Anliker E, Frankel RM, Howes DS, Levinson W, Arch Intern Med 2006 166 10 1107 1114 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1107 16717173 (Pubitemid 43765182)
13. Primary care physicians' response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora's box. Sugg KN, Inui T, JAMA 1992 267 23 3157 3160 10.1001/jama.1992. 03480230049026 1593735
14. Screening and intervention for intimate partner abuse: practices and attitudes of primary care physicians. Rodriguez MA, Bauer HM, McLoughlin E, Grumbach K, JAMA 1999 282 5 468 474 10.1001/jama.282.5.468 10442663 (Pubitemid 29357996)
15. Physician beliefs about victims of spouse abuse and about the physician role. Garimella R, Plichta SB, Houseman C, Garzon L, J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000 9 4 405 411 10.1089/15246090050020727 10868613 (Pubitemid 30411752)
16. Identifying and treating wife abuse. Brown JB, Lent B, Sas G, J Fam Pract 1993 36 2 185 191 8426138 (Pubitemid 23060047)
17. Screening for intimate violence by health care providers-Barriers and interventions. Waalen J, Goodwin MM, Spitz AM, Petersen R, Saltzman LE, Am J Prev Med 2000 19 4 230 237 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00229-4 11064226
18. Reported frequency of domestic violence: cross sectional survey of women attending general practice. Bradley F, Smith M, Long J, O'Dowd T, BMJ 2002 324 7332 271 10.1136/bmj.324.7332.271 11823359
19. Barriers to the diagnosis of depression in primary care. Docherty JP, J Clin Psychiatry 1997 58 1 5 10 9427871 (Pubitemid 27098751)
20. Improving the management of depression in primary care: review and prospects. Rotge JY, Tignol J, Aouizerate B, Encéphale 2007 33 4 Pt 1 552 560 23352880 (Pubitemid 47574631)
21. Statistics Canada, Family Violence in Canada: A Statistical Profile 2005 Canadian Centre for Justice, Ottawa 2005 Report No.: 85-224-XIE
22. Depression. Stewart DE, Gucciardi E, Grace SL, BMC Womens Health 2004 4 1 19 10.1186/1472-6874-4-S1-S19 15345082
23. Engineering information technology for actionable information and better health-balancing social values through desired outcomes, complementary standards and decision-support. Detmer DE, Stud Health Technol Inform 2010 153 107 118 20543241
24. Brown R, Roadmaps for Clinical Practice: Case Studies in Disease Prevention and Health Promotion American Medical Association, Chicago, IL 2002
25. Family Violence Prevention Fund (FVPF), National Consensus Guidelines: On Identifying and Responding to Domestic Violence Victimization in Healthcare Settings Family Violence Prevention Fund, San Francisco, CA 2004 Available online at: http://endabuse.org/programs/healthcare/files/Consensus.pdf
26. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, Peute LW, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 3 327 334 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000094 21422100
27. Some social and psychological consequences of the Long Wall Method of coal-getting. Trist E, Bamforth W, Hum Relat 1951 4 3 38
28. Trist E, Trist B, Murray H, The Social Engagement of Social Science: The Socio-Ecological Perspective (Tavistock Anthology) University of Pennsylvania Press, University Park, PA 1997
29. Hendrick HW, Kleiner BK, Macroergonomics: An Introduction to Work System Design Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica: CA 2001
30. Kane M, Trochim W, Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2007
31. Pattern matching, validity, and conceptualization in program evaluation. Trochim WMK, Eval Rev 1985 9 5 575 604 10.1177/0193841X8500900503
32. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Trochim WMK, Eval Program Plann 1989 12 1 1 16 10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5
33. Quality of care: a comparison of preferences between medical specialists and patients with chronic diseases. VanderWall MAE, Casparie F, Lako CJ, Soc Sci Med 1996 42 5 643 649 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00200-6 8685732 (Pubitemid 26067870)
34. Construction of a GP integration model. Batterham R, Southern D, Appleby N, et al. Soc Sci Med 2002 54 8 1225 1241 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00092-2 11989959 (Pubitemid 34204097)
35. Weller SC RA, Systematic Data Collection Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 1988
36. Coxon A, Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1999
37. Kruskal JB, Wish M, Multidimensional Scaling Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA 1978
38. Aldenderfer MS, Blashfield RK, Cluster Analysis: Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA 44 1984
39. Concept Systems, The Concept System software® Ithaca, NY 4147 2007 23398298
40. Barriers to implementation of a computerized decision support system for depression: an observational report on lessons learned in «real world» clinical settings. Trivedi MH, Daly EJ, Kern JK, Grannemann BD, Sunderajan P, Claassen CA, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009 9 6
41. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Varonen H, Kortteisto T, Kaila M, EBMeDS Study Group, Fam Pract 2008 25 3 162 167 10.1093/fampra/cmn020 18504253 (Pubitemid 351965934)
42. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas AE, Lobach DF, BMJ 2005 330 765 768
43. Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. McGinn CA, Grenier S, Duplantie J, Shaw N, Sicotte C, Mathieu L, et al. BMC Med 2011 9 46
44. Taylor H, The Harris Poll # 21, Cyberchondriacs Update 2002
45. Internet health resources: health searches and email have become more commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall Internet access. Fox S, Fallows D, Pew Internet and American Life Project 2003 http://www.pewinternet.org
46. Patient Internet use for health information at three urban primary care clinics. Dickerson S, Reinhart A, Feeley T, Bidani R, Rich E, Garg V, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 11 499 504 10.1197/jamia.M1460 15298993 (Pubitemid 39421734)
47. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. Diaz A, Griffith R, Ng J, Reinert S, Friedmann P, Moulton A, J Gen Intern Med 2002 17 43 180 185 11929503 (Pubitemid 34603844)
48. The growing influence and use of health care information. Harris Interactive Inc, Report 2011. [ http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/ HarrisPolls ]
49. Health education and the digital divide: building bridges and filling chasms. Bernhardt JM, Editorial, Health Educ Res 2000 15 5 527 531 10.1093/her/15.5.527 11184212
50. Factors associated with Intended use of a web site among family practice patients. Smith-Barbaro PA, Licciardone JC, Clarke HF, Coleridge ST, J Med Internet Res 2001 3 2 17 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e17 11720959
51. Intimate partner violence: what are physicians' perceptions? Zink T, Regan S, Goldenbar L, Pabst S, Rinto B, J Am Board Fam Prcat 2004 17 5 332 340 10.3122/jabfm.17.5.332
52. Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake. Moxey A, Robertson J, Newby D, Hains I, Williamson M, Pearson SA, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 1 25 33 10.1197/jamia.M3170 20064798
53. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, partnership, apomediation, and openness. Eysenbach G, J Med Internet Res 2008 10 3 22 10.2196/jmir.1030 18725354
54. Health promotion dissemination and systems thinking: towards an integrative model. Best A, Moor G, Holmes B, Clark P, Bruce T, Leischow S, et al. Am J Health Behav 2003 27 3 206 216
55. Jackson MC, Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ 2004
56. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. Leischow SJ, Best A, Trochim WM, Clark PI, Gallagher RS, Marcus SE, et al. Am J Prev Med 2008 35 196 S203 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014 18619400 (Pubitemid 351932077)
57. Sociotechnical systems theory in the 21st century: another half-filled glass? Eason K, Sense in Social Science: A collection of Essays in Honour of Dr. Lisl Klein Desmond Graves, Broughton, Desmond G, 2008 123 134
58. Futures signals sense-making framework (FSSF): A start-up tool to analyse and categorise weak signals, wild cards, drivers, trends and other types of information. Kuosa T, Future 2010 42 42 48 10.1016/j.futures.2009.08.003