Eye sensitivity in soft contact lens wearers

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1682-1690

  Spyridon, Michael ^a   Hickson Curran, Sheila ^b   Hunt, Chris ^a   Young, Graeme ^a  

^a Visioncare Research Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

Author keywords

contact lens; senofilcon A; sensitivity; signs; symptoms

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC DATA; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS; CLINICAL SIGNS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SENOFILCON A; SENSITIVITY; SIGNS; SILICONE HYDROGELS; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SYMPTOMS;

BIOMETRICS; POPULATION STATISTICS; SILICONES;

CONTACT LENSES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONJUNCTIVA; CONJUNCTIVA DISEASE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA LIMBUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; HYPEREMIA; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; VASCULARIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONJUNCTIVA; CONJUNCTIVAL DISEASES; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEAL DISEASES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; LIMBUS CORNEAE; MALE; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871097947     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182775c78     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Farage MA, Katsarou A, Maibach HI. Sensory, clinical and physiological factors in sensitive skin: A review. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:1-14.
2. Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci 2009;51:323-32.
3. Pons-Guiraud A. Sensitive skin: A complex and multifactorial syndrome. J Cosmet Dermatol 2004;3:145-8.
4. Rees JS, Jin LJ, Lam S, Kudanowska I, Vowles R. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong. J Dent 2003;31:453-61.
5. Yoshiyama M, Noiri Y, Ozaki K, Uchida A, Ishikawa Y, Ishida H. Transmission electron microscopic characterization of hypersensitive human radicular dentin. J Dent Res 1990;69:1293-7.
6. Alba-Bueno F, Beltran-Masgoret A, Sanjuan C, Biarnes M, Marin J. Corneal shape changes induced by first and second generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses in daily wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32:88-92.
7. Tyagi G, Collins M, Read S, Davis B. Regional changes in corneal thickness and shape with soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87:567-75.
8. Diec J, Evans VE, Tilia D, Naduvilath T, Holden BA, Lazon de la Jara P. Comparison of ocular comfort, vision, and SICS during silicone hydrogel contact lens daily wear. Eye Contact Lens 2012; 38:2-6.
9. Fonn D, Peterson R, Woods C. Corneal staining as a response to contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2010;36:318-21.
10. Carnt NA, Evans VE, Naduvilath TJ, Willcox MD, Papas EB, Frick KD, Holden BA. Contact lens-Related adverse events and the silicone hydrogel lenses and daily wear care system used. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1616-23.
11. Davies I, Veys J. Subjective daily wear performance of two silicone hydrogel lenses. Optician 2005;229:34-38.
12. Papas EB, Vajdic CM, Austen R, Holden BA. High-oxygentransmissibility soft contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperemia. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:942-8.
13. Chalmers RL, Dillehay S, Long B, Barr JT, Bergenske P, Donshik P, Secor G, Yoakum J. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:549-54.
14. Dumbleton K, Keir N, Moezzi A, Jones L, Fonn D. Redness, dryness and comfort following refitting long term low Dk hydrogel lens wearers with silicone hydrogels. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81(Suppl.):31.
15. Brennan NA, Coles ML, Ang JH. An evaluation of silicone-hydrogel lenses worn on a daily wear basis. Clin Exp Optom 2006;89:18-25.
16. Steffen RB, Schnider CM. The impact of silicone hydrogel materials on overnight corneal swelling. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:115-20.
17. Ousler GW, 3rd, Anderson RT, Osborn KE. The effect of senofilcon A contact lenses compared to habitual contact lenses on ocular discomfort during exposure to a controlled adverse environment. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:335-41.
18. Riley C, Young G, Chalmers R. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: The effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon A). Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:281-6.
19. Coverly J, Peters L, Whittle E, Basketter DA. Susceptibility to skin stinging, non-immunologic contact urticaria and acute skin irritation; is there a relationship? Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:90-5.
20. Marriott M, Holmes J, Peters L, Cooper K, Rowson M, Basketter DA. The complex problem of sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:93-9.
21. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentine Hypersensitivity. Consensusbased recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:221-6.
22. Chalmers RL, Hunt C, Hickson-Curran S, Young G. Struggle with hydrogel CL wear increases with age in young adults. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009;32:113-9.
23. Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77: 40-6.
24. Schafer J, Mitchell GL, Chalmers RL, Long B, Dillehay S, Barr J, Bergenske P, Donshik P, Secor G, Yoakum J. The stability of dryness symptoms after refitting with silicone hydrogel contact lenses over 3 years. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:247-52.
25. Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:25-30.
26. Weed KH, Fonn D, Potvin R. Discontinuation of contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70(Suppl.):140.
27. Pritchard N, Fonn D, Brazeau D. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: A survey. Inter Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:157-62.
28. Young G. Why one million contact lens wearers dropped out. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2004;27:83-5.
29. Chalmers R, Long B, Dillehay S, Begley C. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:778-84.
30. Zhou B, Li Y, Randall NX, Li L. A study of the frictional properties of senofilcon-A contact lenses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:1336-42.
31. Young G. Evaluation of soft contact lens fitting characteristics. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:247-54.
32. Versura P, Bernabini B, Torreggiani A, Cellini M, Caramazza R. Frequent replacement and conventional daily wear soft contact lens symptomatic patients: Tear film and ocular surface changes. Int J Artif Organs 2000;23:629-36.
33. Lin MC, Yeh TN, Graham AD, Truong T, Hsiao C, Wei G, Louie A. Ocular surface health during 30-day continuous wear: Rigid gaspermeable versus silicone hydrogel hyper-O2 transmitted contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:3530-8.
34. Nguyen TH, Dudek LT, Krisciunas TC, Matiaco P, Planck SR, Mathers WD, Rosenbaum JT. In vivo confocal microscopy: Increased conjunctival or episcleral leukocyte adhesion in patients who wear contact lenses with lower oxygen permeability (Dk) values. Cornea 2004;23:695-700.