A study of the frictional properties of senofilcon-A contact lenses

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1336-1342

  Zhou, Bo ^a   Li, Yuanting ^b   Randall, Nicholas X ^a   Li, Lei ^b  

^a CSM Instruments   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

Author keywords

"Repulsion adsorption" model; Contact lens; Friction; Hydrogel; Polymer

Indexed keywords

AMONTON'S LAW; APPLIED LOADS; CLINICAL PERFORMANCE; FRICTION FORCE; FRICTION MECHANISM; FRICTIONAL PROPERTIES; MATERIAL CHEMISTRY; NORMAL LOADS; REPULSION-ADSORPTION MODEL; SALINE SOLUTIONS; SLIDING VELOCITIES; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SOLID-SOLID CONTACTS; STAINLESS STEEL BALLS;

ADSORPTION; CONTACT LENSES; STAINLESS STEEL; TRIBOLOGY; WATER CONTENT;

FRICTION;

POLYMER; SENOFILCON A; SODIUM CHLORIDE; STAINLESS STEEL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; FORCE; FRICTION; FRICTION FORCE; MODEL; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPULSION ADSORPTION MODEL; SOFT CONTACT LENS; VELOCITY; VISCOSITY; WATER CONTENT;

CONTACT LENSES; FRICTION; HYDROGELS; MATERIALS TESTING; SILICONES;

EID: 80955181049     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bowden F.P., Tabor D. The Friction and Lubrication of Solids 1950, Oxford University Press.
2. Exartier C., Maximovitch S., Baroux B. Streaming potential measurements on stainless steels surfaces: evidence of a gel-like layer at the steel/electrolyte interface. Corrosion Science 2004, 46:1777-1800.
3. Giraldez M.J., Serra C., Lira M., RealOliveira M.E., Yebra-Pimentel E. Soft contact lens surface profile by atomic force microscopy. Optometry and Vision Science 2010, 87(7):E475-E481.
4. Gong J. Friction and lubrication of hydrogels-its richness and complexity. Soft Matter 2006, 2:544-552.
5. Gong J.P., Iwasaki Y., Osada Y., Kurihara K., Hamai Y. Friction of gels. 3. Friction on solid surfaces. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1999, 103:6001-6006.
6. Gong J.P., Osada Y. Gel friction: a model based on surface repulsion and adsorption. Journal of Chemical Physics 1998, 10(18):8062-8068.
7. Granick S. Motions and relaxations of confined liquids. Science 1991, 253(5026):1374-1379.
8. Hu H.W., Carson G.A., Granick S. Relaxation time of confined liquids under shear. Physical Review Letters 1991, 66(21):2758-2761.
9. Kim S.H., Marmob C., Somorjai G.A. AFM and SFG studies of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lens surfaces in saline solution: adhesion, friction, and the presence of non-crosslinked polymer chains at the surface. Biomaterials 2002, 23:1657-1666.
10. Kim S.H., Marmob C., Somorjai G.A. Friction studies of hydrogel contact lenses using AFM: non-crosslinked polymers of low friction at the surface. Biomaterials 2001, 22:3285-3294.
11. Koffas T.S., Opdahl A., Marmo C., Somorjai G.A. Effect of equilibrium bulk water content on the humidity-dependent surface mechanical properties of hydrophilic contact lenses studied by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2003, 19:3453-3460.
12. Liu X., Nanao H., Li T., Mori S. A study on the friction properties of PAAc hydrogel under low loads in air and water. Wear 2004, 257:665-670.
13. McMahon T.T., Zadnik K. Twenty-five years of contact lenses: the impact on the cornea and ophthalmic practice. Cornea 2000, 19(5):730-740.
14. Meyer E., Overney R.M., Dransfeld K., Gyalog T. Friction and Rheology on the Nanometer Scale 2002, World Scientific.
15. Nairn, J.A., Jiang, T., 1995. Measurement of the friction and lubricity properties of contact lenses. In: Proceedings of ANTEC'95. Boston, MA, May 7-11.
16. Oogaki S., Kagata G., Kurokawa T., Kuroda S., Osada Y., Gong J. Friction between like-charged hydrogels-combined mechanisms of boundary, hydrated and elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Soft Matter 2009, 5:1879-1887.
17. Opdahl A., Kim S.H., Kaffas T.S., Marmo C., Somorjai G.A. Surface mechanical properties of pHEMA contact lenses: viscoelastic and adhesive property changes on exposure to controlled humidity. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 2003, 67A:350-356.
18. Pan Y., Xiong D., Chen X. Friction behavior of poly (vinyl alcohol) gel against stainless steel ball in different lubricant media. Journal of Tribology 2008, 130(031802):1-5.
19. Radmacher M., Fritz M., Hansma P.K. Imaging soft samples with the atomic force microscope: gelatin in water and propanol. Biophysical Journal 1995, 69:264-270.
20. Raviv U., Klein J. Fluidity of bound hydration layers. Science 2002, 297:1540-1543.
21. Raviv U., Laurat P., Klein J. Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films. Nature 2001, 413:51-54.
22. Raviv U., Perkin S., Laurat P., Klein J. Fluidity of water confined down to subnanometer films. Langmuir 2004, 20:5322-5332.
23. Rennie A.C., Dickrell P.L., Sawyer W.G. Friction coefficient of soft contact lenses: measurements and modeling. Tribology Letters 2005, 18(4):499-504.
24. Tominaga T., Takedomi N., Biederman H., Furukawa H., Osada Y., Gong J.P. Effect of substrate adhesion and hydrophobicity on hydrogel friction. Soft Matter 2008, 4:1033-1040.
25. Wichterle O., Lim D. Hydrophilic gels for biological use. Nature 1960, 185:177-182.
26. Young G., Garofalo R., Harmer O., Peters S. The effect of soft contact lens care produts on lens modulus. Contact Lens & Anterior Eyes 2010, 33:210-214.