A pivotal-based approach for enterprise business process and IS integration

Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 61-78

  Ulmer, Jean Stéphane ^a,b   Belaud, Jean Pierre ^a,b   Le Lann, Jean Marc ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DE GÉNIE CHIMIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

business process management; functional integration; operational alignment

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS MODELS; BUSINESS ENGINEERING; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS-IT; ENTERPRISE BUSINESS PROCESS; FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION; GENERIC APPROACH; HETEROGENEOUS MODELS; IMPLEMENTATION MODELS; MULTI-VIEWS;

ALIGNMENT; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SEMANTICS;

MODELS;

EID: 84871075713     PISSN: 17517575     EISSN: 17517583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2012.700326     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Avison, D. 2004. Using and validating the strategic alignment model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(3): 223-246.
2. Dijkman, R.M. 2008. Consistency in multi-viewpoint design of enterprise information systems. Information and Software Technology, 50: 737-752.
3. Engelsman, W. 2011. Extending enterprise architecture modelling with business goals and requirements. Enterprise Information Systems, 5: 9-36.
4. Favre, J.-M. 2006. L'ingénierie dirigée par les modèles-Au-delà du MDA, Cachan, France: Hermes-Lavoisier.
5. Fettke, P. 2006. Business Process Reference Models: survey and classification. Business Process Management Workshops, 3812: 469-483.
6. Gamma, E. 2000. Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software, Canada: Addison-Wesley Professional.
7. Grembergen, W.V. 2004. Strategies for information technology governance, Calgary: Idea Group, Inc. (IGI).
8. Guarino, N. 1995. Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43: 625-640.
9. Henderson, J.C. and Venkatraman, N. 1999. Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32: 472-484.
10. Izza, S. 2009. Integration of industrial information systems: from syntactic to semantic integration approaches. Enterprise Information Systems, 3: 1-57.
11. Jézéquel, J.-M. 2011. Model driven language engineering with Kermeta. Generative and Transformational Techniques in Software Engineering III, 6491: 201-221.
12. Kent, S. 2002. "Model driven engineering". In Integrated formal methods, Edited by: Butler, M. 286-298. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
13. Klein, J. 2007. Weaving multiple aspects in sequence diagrams. Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development III, 4620: 167-199.
14. Millet, P.-A. 2009. The SCOR model for the alignment of business processes and information systems. Enterprise Information Systems, 3: 393-407.
15. Muller, P.-A. Weaving executability into object-oriented meta-languages. Proceedings of MODELS/UML'2005. pp.264-278. Heidelberg: Springer.
16. OASIS. 2007. WSBPEL-Web Service Business Process Execution Language [online]. Available from: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/wsbpel-v2.0.pdf [Accessed 26 June 2012]
17. Object Management Group. 2009. BPMN-Business Process Modeling Notation specification 1.2 [online]. Available from: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.2 [Accessed 26 June 2012]
18. Peppard, J. and Ward, J. 1999. 'Mind the gap': diagnosing the relationship between the IT organisation and the rest of the business. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(1): 29-60.
19. Rizopoulos, N. and McBrien, P. 2005. A general approach to the generation of conceptual model transformations. Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 3520: 326-341.
20. Seidewitz, E. 2003. What models mean. IEEE Computer Society, 20(5): 26-32.
21. Stein, S. 2009. Business to IT transformations revisited. Business Process Management Workshops, 17: 176-187.
22. Stevens, P. 2008. A landscape of Bidirectional Model transformations. Generative and Transformational Techniques in Software Engineering II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5235: 408-424.
23. Ulmer, J.-S. 2011. Approche générique pour la modélisation et l'implémentation des processus, Toulouse, France: Université de Toulouse-INPT ENSIACET. Thesis (PhD)
24. Ulmer, J.-S. 2011. Towards a pivotal-based approach for business process alignment. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(11): 1010-1021.
25. Zur, Muehlen, M. and Recker, J. How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation. 20th international conference on advanced information systems engineering (CAISE 2008). pp.465-479. France: Springer.