A general approach to the generation of conceptual model transformations

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3520, Issue , 2005, Pages 326-341

  Rizopoulos, Nikolaos ^a   McBrien, Peter ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DATA PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS; SECURITY OF DATA;

CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DATA INTEGRATION; MERGE OPERATORS; RATIONAL MODELS;

MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

EID: 25144498380     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11431855_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S. Navathe. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4):323-364, 1986.
2. P. Bernstein. Applying model management to classical meta data problems. In Proc. CIDR, 2003, 2003.
3. Philip A. Bernstein and Rachel A. Pottinger. Merging models based on given correspondences. In Proc. 29th VLDB Conference, Berlin, 2003.
4. M. Boyd, S. Kittivoravitkul, C. Lazanitis, P.J. McBrien, and N. Rizopoulos. AutoMed: A BAV data integration system for heterogeneous data sources. In Proc. CAiSE2004, volume 3084 of LNCS, pages 82-97. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
5. M. Boyd, S. Kittivoravitkul, C. Lazanitis, P.J. McBrien, and N. Rizopoulos. Overview of the automed repository. Technical Report No. 26, AutoMed, 2004.
6. M. Boyd and P.J. McBrien. Towards a semi-automated approach to intermodel transformations. In Proc. EMMSAD 04, CAiSE Workshop Proceedings Volume 1, pages 175-188, 2004.
7. P. Buneman et al. Comprehension syntax. SIGMOD Record, 23(1):87-96, 1994.
8. Robin Dhamankar, Yoonkyong Lee, AnHai Doan, Alon Halevy, and Pedro Domingos. iMAP: discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In Proc. SIGMOD 2004, pages 383-394. ACM Press, 2004.
9. Anca Dobre, Farshad Hakimpour, and Klaus R. Dittrich. Operators and classification for data mapping in semantic integration. In Proc. ER 2003, pages 534-547, 2003.
10. F. Hakimpour and A. Geppert. Global schema generation using formal ontologies. In Proc. ER02, volume 2503 of LNCS, pages 307-321. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
11. E. Jasper, N. Tong, P.J. McBrien, and A. Poulovassilis. View generation and optimisation in the AutoMed data integration framework. In Proc. Baltic DB&IS04, volume 672 of Scientific Papers, pages 13-30. Univ. Latvia, 2004.
12. J.A. Larson, S.B. Navathe, and R. Elmasri. A theory of attribute equivalence in databases with application to schema integration. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(4):449-463, April 1989.
13. M. Lenzerini. Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In Proc. PODS'02, pages 233-246. ACM, 2002.
14. L.Xu and D.W. Embley. Discovering direct and indirect matches for schema elements. In 8th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA '03), Kyoto, Japan, March 26-28, 2003, pages 39-46, 2003.
15. J. Madhavan, P.A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic schema matching with Cupid. In Proc. 27th VLDB Conference, pages 49-58, 2001.
16. P.J. McBrien and A. Poulovassilis. A uniform approach to inter-model transformations. In Proc. CAiSE'99, volume 1626 of LNCS, pages 333-348. Springer, 1999.
17. P.J. McBrien and A. Poulovassilis. A semantic approach to integrating XML and structured data sources. In Proc. CAiSE'01, volume 2068 of LNCS, pages 330-345. Springer, 2001.
18. P.J. McBrien and A. Poulovassilis. Data integration by bi-directional schema transformation rules. In Proc. ICDE'03, pages 227-238. IEEE, 2003.
19. Sergey Melnik, Erhard Rahm, and Philip A. Bernstein. Rondo: a programming platform for generic model management. In Proc. SIGMOD 2003, pages 193-204. ACM Press, 2003.
20. R.J. Miller, M.A. Hernández, L.M. Haas, L.-L. Yan, C.T.H. Ho, R. Fagin, and L. Popa. The Clio project: Managing heterogeneity. SIGMOD Record, 30(1):78-83, 2001.
21. C. Parent and S. Scappapoetra. View integration: A step forward in solving structural conflicts. Research Report, EPFL-Computer Sc. Dept. Lausanne, 1990.
22. A. Poulovassilis and M. Levene. A nested-graph model for the representation and manipulation of complex objects. ACM Trans. on Information Systems, 12(1):35-68, 1994.
23. A. Poulovassilis and P.J. McBrien. A general formal framework for schema transformation. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 28(1):47-71, 1998.
24. S. Scappapietra and C. Parent. View integration: A step forward in solving structural conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 6(2):258-274, April 1994.
25. C. Zaniolo and M. Melkanoff. A formal approach to the definition and the design of conceptual schemata for database systems. ACM TODS, 1982.