Novel natural genetic variation controlling the competence to form adventitious roots and shoots from the tomato wild relative Solanum pennellii

Plant Science

Volumn 199-200, Issue , 2013, Pages 121-130

  Arikita, Fernanda Namie ^a   Azevedo, Mariana Silva ^a   Scotton, Danielle Camargo ^a   Pinto, Maísa de Siqueira ^a   Figueira, Antonio ^a   Peres, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Introgression lines; Micro Tom; Regeneration; Rg1; S. lycopersicum

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; COTYLEDON; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MUTATION; PLANT; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT ROOT; REGENERATION; SEEDLING; SOLANUM;

BREEDING; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; COTYLEDON; DNA, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUTATION; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; REGENERATION; SEEDLING; SOLANUM;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII;

EID: 84871054151     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Vasil I.K. A history of plant biotechnology: from the Cell Theory of Schleiden and Schwann to biotech crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27:1423-1440.
2. Duclercq J., Sangwan-Norreel B., Catterou M., Sangwan R.S. De novo shoot organogenesis: from art to science. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:597-606.
3. Estruch J.J., Prinsen E., Van Onckelen H., Schell J., Spena A. Viviparous leaves produced by somatic activation of an inactive cytokinin-synthesizing gene. Science 1991, 254:1364-2136.
4. Peres L.E.P., Morgante P.G., Vechi C., Kraus J.E., Van Sluys M.-A. Shoot regeneration capacity from roots and transgenic hairy roots of different tomato cultivars and wild related species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2001, 65:37-44.
5. Gallois J.-L., Woodward C., Reddy G.V., Sablowski R. Combined SHOOT MERISTEMLESS and WUSCHEL trigger ectopic organogenesis in Arabidopsis. Development 2002, 129:3207-3217.
6. Catterou M., Dubois F., Smets R., Vaniet S., Kichey T., Van Onckelen H., Sangwan-Norreel B.S., Sangwan R.S. hoc: an Arabidopsis mutant overproducing cytokinins and expressing high in vitro organogenic capacity. Plant J. 2002, 30:273-287.
7. Lima J.E., Benedito V.A., Figueira A., Peres L.E. Callus, shoot and hairy root formation in vitro as affected by the sensitivity to auxin and ethylene in tomato mutants. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28:1169-1177.
8. Cary A.J., Che P., Howell S.H. Developmental events and shoot apical meristem gene expression patterns during shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2002, 32:867-877.
9. Che P., Lall S., Nettleton D., Howell S.H. Gene expression programs during shoot, root, and callus development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141:620-637.
10. Che P., Lall S., Howell S.H. Developmental steps in acquiring competence for shoot development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Planta 2007, 226:1183-1194.
11. Sondahl M.R., Evans D.A., Prioli L.M., Silva W.J. Tissue culture regeneration of plants in Zea diploperennis, a close relative of corn. Biotechnology 1984, 2:455-458.
12. Mathias R.J., Fukui K. The effect of specific chromosome and cytoplasm substitutions on the tissue culture response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1986, 71:797-800.
13. Bohorova N.E., Cocking E.C., Power J.B. Isolation, culture and callus regeneration of protoplasts of wild and cultivated Helianthus species. Plant Cell Rep. 1986, 5:256-258.
14. Hu Q., Andersen S.B., Hansen L.N. Plant regeneration capacity of mesophyll protoplasts from Brassica napus and related species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1999, 59:189-196.
15. Koornneef M., AlonsoBlanco C., Peeters A.J.M. Genetic approaches in plant physiology. New Phytol. 1997, 137:1-8.
16. Ochoa I.E., Blair M.W., Lynch J.P. QTL analysis of adventitious root formation in common bean under contrasting phosphorus availability. Crop Sci. 2006, 46:1609-1621.
17. Kauffman J.B. Survival by sprouting following fire in tropical forests of the Eastern Amazon. Biotropica 1991, 23:219-224.
18. van der Meijden E., Wijn M., Verkaar H.J. Defense and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 1988, 51:355-363.
19. Mano Y., Muraki M., Fujimori M., Takamizo T., Kindiger B. Identification of QTL controlling adventitious root formation during flooding conditions in teosinte (Zea mays ssp huehuetenangensis) seedlings. Euphytica 2005, 142:33-42.
20. Rick C.M. Tomato mutants: freaks, anomalies, and breeder's resources. HortScience 1986, 21:917-918.
21. Rick C.M. Tomato paste: a concentrated review of genetics highlight from the beginnings to the advent of molecular genetics. Genetics 1991, 128:1-5.
22. Stevens M.A., Rick C.M. Genetic and breeding. The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement 1986, 35-109. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London. J.G. Atherton, J. Rudich (Eds.).
23. Bai Y., Lindhout P. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future?. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100:1085-1094.
24. Eshed Y., Zamir D. A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 1994, 79:175-179.
25. Paran I., Zamir D. Quantitative traits in plants: beyond the QTL. Trends Genet. 2003, 19:303-306.
26. Carvalho R.F., Campos M.L., Pino L.E., Crestana S.L., Zsögön A., Lima J.E., Benedito V.A., Peres L.E.P. Convergence of developmental mutants into a single tomato model system: 'Micro-Tom' as an effective toolkit for plant development research. Plant Methods 2011, 7:18.
27. Scott J., Harbaugh B. Micro-Tom: a miniature dwarf tomato. Florida Agric. Exp. Station Circular 1989, 370:1-6.
28. Meissner R., Jacobson Y., Melamed S., Levyatuv S., Shalev G., Ashri A., Elkind Y., Levy A. A new model system for tomato genetics. Plant J. 1997, 12:1465-1472.
29. Campos M.L., Carvalho R.F., Benedito V.A., Peres L.E.P. Small and remarkable: the Micro-Tom model system as a tool to discover novel hormonal functions and interactions. Plant Sig. Behav. 2010, 5:50-54.
30. Norton J.P., Boll W.G. Callus and shoot formation from tomato roots in vitro. Science 1954, 119:220-221.
31. Kut S.A., Evans D.A. Plant regeneration from cultured leaf explants of eight wild tomato species and two related Solanum species. In Vitro 1982, 18:593-598.
32. Koornneef M., Hanhart C.J., Martinelli L. A genetic analysis of cell culture traits in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1987, 74:633-641.
33. Stommel J.R., Sinden S.L. Genotypic differences in shoot forming capacity of cultured leaf explants of Lycopersicon hirsutum. HortScience 1991, 26:1317-1320.
34. de Faria R.T., Destro D., Bespalhok J.C., Illg R.D. Introgression of in vitro regeneration capability of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium Mill. into recalcitrant tomato cultivars. Euphytica 2002, 124:59-63.
35. Hamza S., Chupeau Y. Re-evaluation of conditions for plant regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). J. Exp. Bot. 1993, 44:1837-1845.
36. Meredith C.P. Shoot development in established callus cultures of cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1979, 95:405-411.
37. Morgan A., Cocking E.C. Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1982, 106:97-104.
38. Koornneef M., Bade J., Hanhart C., Horsman K., Schel J., Soppe W., Vererk R., Zabel P. Characterization and mapping of a gene controlling shoot regeneration in tomato. Plant J. 1993, 3:131-141.
39. Fray R., Grierson D. Identification and genetic analysis of normal and mutant phytoene synthase genes of tomato by sequencing, complementation and cosuppression. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 22:589-602.
40. Lima J.E., Carvalho R.F., Tulmann Neto A., Figueira A., Peres L.E.P. Micro-MsK: a tomato genotype with miniature size, short life cycle and improved in vitro shoot regeneration. Plant Sci. 2004, 167:753-757.
41. Pino L.E., Lombardi-Crestana S., Azevedo M.S., Scotton D.C., Borgo L., Quecini V., Figueira A., Peres L.E.P. The Rg1 allele as a valuable tool for genetic transformation of the tomato Micro-Tom model system. Plant Methods 2010, 6:23.
42. Lombardi-Crestana S., Azevedo M.S., Silva G.F.F., Pino L.E., Appezzato-da-Glória B., Figueira A., Nogueira F.T.S., Peres L.E.P. The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv Micro-Tom) natural genetic variation Rg1 and the DELLA mutant procera control the competence necessary to form adventitious roots and shoots. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:5689-5703.
43. Fulton T.M., Chunwongse J., Tanksley S.D. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plant. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1995, 13:207-209.
44. Yeager T. The uniform fruit color gene in the tomato. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1935, 33:512.
45. Pnueli L., Carmel-Goren L., Hareven D., Gutfinger T., Alvarez J., Ganal M., Zamir D., Lifschitz E. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 1998, 125:1979-1989.
46. Martí E., Gisbert C., Bishop G.J., Dixon M.S., GarciaMartinez J.L. Genetic and physiological characterization of tomato cv. Micro-Tom. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:2037-2047.
47. Bishop G.J., Nomura T., Yokota T., Harrison K., Noguchi T., Fujioka S., Takatsuto S., Jones J.D.G., Kamiya Y. The tomato DWARF enzyme catalyses C-6 oxidation in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:1761-1766.
48. DeVicente M.C., Tanksley S.D. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 1993, 134:585-596.
49. Liu Y.-S., Gur A., Ronen G., Causse M., Damidaux R., Buret M., Hirschberg J., Zamir D. There is more to tomato fruit colour than candidate carotenoid genes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2003, 1:195-207.
50. Trujillo-Moya C., Gisbert C., Vilanova S., Nuez F. Localization of QTLs for in vitro plant regeneration in tomato. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11:140.
51. Satoh H., Takashina T., Escalante A., Egashira H., Imanishi S. Molecular markers mapped around the high shoot regeneration capacity gene Rg-2 in Lycopersicon chilense. Breed Sci. 2000, 50:251-256.
52. Garcia-Reina G., Luque A. Analysis of the organogenic potential of calli of three Canary Island Lycopersicon esculentum land races. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1988, 12:279-283.
53. Porte W.S., Walker H.B. A cross between Lycopersicon esculentum and disease resistant L. peruvianum. Phytopathology 1945, 35:931-933.
54. Heuvelink E., Buiskool R.P.M. Influence of sink-source interaction on dry matter production in tomato. Ann. Bot. 1995, 75:381-389.
55. Christianson M.L., Warnick D.A. Organogenesis in vitro as a developmental process. HortScience 1988, 23:515-519.
56. Bonnett H.T., Torrey J.G. Comparative anatomy of endogenous bud and lateral root formation in Convolvulus arvensis roots cultured in vitro. Am. J. Bot. 1966, 53:496-507.
57. Sugimoto K., Jiao Y., Meyerowitz E.M. Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:463-471.
58. Skoog F., Miller C.O. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1957, 11:118-131.
59. Wareing P.F. Determination and related aspects of plant development. The Molecular Biology of Plant Development 1982, vol.18:517-541. Bachwell Scientific Publ, Oxford.
60. Tran Thanh Van M. Direct flower neoformation from superficial tissue of small explants of Nicotiana tabacum L. Planta 1973, 115:87-92.
61. Sugimoto K., Gordon S.P., Meyerowitz E.M. Regeneration in plants and animals: dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, or just differentiation?. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:212-218.
62. Boiten H., Azmi A., Dillen W., Schepper S., Debergh P., Gerats T., Onckelen H., Prinsen E. The Rg-1 encoded regeneration capacity of tomato is not related to an altered cytokinin homeostasis. New Phytol. 2004, 161:761-771.
63. Peres L.E.P., Kerbauy G.B. High cytokinin accumulation following root tip excision changes the endogenous auxin to cytokinin ratio during root-to-shoot conversion in Catasetum fimbriatum Lindl. (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Rep. 1999, 18:1002-1006.
64. Engstrom E.M., Andersen C.M., Gumulak-Smith J., Hu J., Orlova E., Sozzani R., Bowman J.L. Arabidopsis homologs of the Petunia HAIRY MERISTEM gene are required for maintenance of shoot and root indeterminacy. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155:735-750.
65. Schumacher K., Schmitt T., Rossberg M., Schmitz G., Theres K. The Lateral suppressor (Ls) gene of tomato encodes a new member of the VHIID protein family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:290-295.
66. Motte H., Verstraeten I., Werbrouck S., Geelen D. CUC2 as an early marker for regeneration competence in Arabidopsis root explants. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168:1598-1601.
67. Ezura H., Harberd N.P. Endogenous gibberellin levels influence in-vitro shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyhn. Planta 1995, 197:301-305.
68. Campos M.L., Almeida M., Rossi M.L., Martinelli A.P., Junior C.G.L., Figueira A., Rampelotti-Ferreira F.T., Vendramim J.D., Benedito V.A., Peres L.E.P. Brassinosteroids interact negatively with jasmonates in the formation of anti-herbivory traits in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:4347-4361.
69. Fillati J.J., Kiser J., Rose R., Comai L. Efficient transfer of a glyphosate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector. Biotechnology 1987, 5:726-730.
70. Forster B.P., Thomas W.T.B. Doubled haploids in genetics and plant breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 2005, 25:57-88.
71. Dirks R., van Dun K., de Snoo C.B., van den Berg M., Lelivelt C.L.C., Voermans W., Woudenberg L., de Wit J.P.C., Reinink K.J.W., Schut E., van der Zeeuw A., Vogelaar G., Freymark E.W., Gutteling M.N., Keppel P., van Drongelen M., Kieny P., Ellul A., Touraev H., Ma H., de Jong E., Wijnker Reverse breeding: a novel breeding approach based on engineered meiosis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009, 7:837-845.
72. Seguí-Simarro J.M., Corral-Martínez P., Parra-Vega V., González-García B. Androgenesis in recalcitrant solanaceous crops. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30:765-778.