The Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom) Natural Genetic Variation Rg1 and the della Mutant Procera Control the Competence Necessary to Form Adventitious Roots and Shoots

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 63, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 5689-5703

  Lombardi Crestana, Simone ^a   Da Silva Azevedo, Mariana ^a   E Silva, Geraldo Felipe Ferreira ^a,b   Pino, Lílian Ellen ^a   Appezzato Da Glória, Beatriz ^a   Figueira, Antonio ^a   Nogueira, Fabio Tebaldi Silveira ^b   Peres, Lázaro Eustáquio Pereira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cell fate; competence; determination; hormonal mutants; Micro Tom; plant development; regeneration

Indexed keywords

GIBBERELLIN; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHYTOHORMONE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COTYLEDON; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; FLOWER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; MERISTEM; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; REGENERATION; SEEDLING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOMATO; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

ALLELES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COTYLEDON; CULTURE TECHNIQUES; FLOWERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; GIBBERELLINS; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MERISTEM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; REGENERATION; SEEDLING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

DELLA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM; SOLANUM;

EID: 84866666367     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers221     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Atta R, Laurens L, Boucheron-Dubuisson E, Guivarc'h A, Carnero E, Giraudat-Pautot V, Rech P, Chriqui D. 2009. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. The Plant Journal 57, 626-644.
2. Banno H, Ikeda Y, Niu Q-W, Chua N-H. 2001. Overexpression of Arabidopsis ESR1 induces initiation of shoot regeneration. Thye Plant Cell 13, 2609-2618.
3. Barton MK. 2001. Leaving the meristem behind: regulation of KNOX genes. Genome Biology 2, 1-3.
4. Bassel GW, Mullen RT, Bewley JD. 2008. procera is a putative DELLA mutant in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): effects on the seed and vegetative plant. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 585-593.
5. Berger Y, Harpaz-Saad S, Brand A, Melnik H, Sirding N, Alvarez JP, Zinder M, Samach A, Eshed Y, Ori N. 2009. The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves. Development 136, 823-832.
6. Boiten H, Azmi A, Dillen W, Schepper S, Debergh P, Gerats T, Onckelen H, Prinsen E. 2004. The Rg-1 encoded regeneration capacity of tomato is not related to an altered cytokinin homeostasis. New Phytologist 161, 761-771.
7. Bonnett HT Jr, Torrey JG. 1966. Comparative anatomy of endogenous bud and lateral root formation in Convolvulus arvensis roots cultured in vitro. American Journal of Botany 53, 496-507.
8. Carvalho RF, Campos ML, Pino LE, Crestana SL, Zsögön A, Lima JE, Benedito VA, Peres LEP. 2011. Convergence of developmental mutants into a single tomato model system: 'Micro-Tom' as an effective toolkit for plant development research. Plant Methods 7, 18.
9. Cary AJ, Che P, Howell SH. 2002. Developmental events and shoot apical meristem gene expression patterns during shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 32, 867-877.
10. Catterou M, Dubois F, Smets R, Vaniet S, Kichey T, Van Onckelen H, Sangwan-Norreel BS, Sangwan RS. 2002. hoc: an Arabidopsis mutant overproducing cytokinins and expressing high in vitro organogenic capacity. The Plant Journal 30, 273-287.
11. Chandler JW. 2008. Cotyledon organogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 2917-2931.
12. Chaudhury AM, Letham S, Craig S, Dennis ES. 1993. amp1: a mutant with high cytokinin levels and altered embryonic pattern, faster vegetative growth, constitutive photomorphogenesis and precocious flowering. The Plant Journal 4, 907-916.
13. Che P, Lall S, Howell SH. 2007. Developmental steps in acquiring competence for shoot development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Planta 226, 1183-1194.
14. Che P, Lall S, Nettleton D, Howell SH. 2006. Gene expression programs during shoot, root, and callus development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Plant Physiology 141, 620-637.
15. Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, et al. 2005. Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 33, 179.
16. Chen JJ, Janssen BJ, Williams A, Sinha N. 1997. A gene fusion at a homeobox locus: alterations in leaf shape and implications for morphological evolution. The Plant Cell 9, 1289-1304.
17. Christianson ML, Warnick DA. 1985. Temporal requirement for phytohormone balance in the control of organogenesis in vitro. Developmental Biology 112, 494-497.
18. Christianson ML, Warnick DA. 1988. Organogenesis in vitro as a developmental process. HortScience 23, 515-519.
19. Chuck G, Lincoln C, Hake S. 1996. KNAT1 induces lobed leaves with ectopic meristem when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 8, 1277-1289.
20. Duclercq J, Sangwan-Norreel B, Catterou M, Sangwan RS. 2011. De novo shoot organogenesis: from art to science. Trends in Plant Science 16, 597-606.
21. Estruch JJ, Prinsen E, Van Onckelen H, Schell J, Spena A. 1991. Viviparous leaves produced by somatic activation of an inactive cytokinin-synthesizing gene. Science 254, 1364-1367.
22. Ezura H, Harberd NP. 1995. Endogenous gibberellin levels influence in vitro shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta 197, 301-305.
23. Fosket DE. 1994. Plant growth and development. New York: Academic Press.
24. Gallois JL, Woodward C, Reddy GV, Sablowski R. 2002. Combined SHOOT MERISTEMLESS and WUSCHEL trigger ectopic organogenesis in Arabidopsis. Development 129, 3207-3217.
25. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient requirement of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Experimental Cell Research 50, 151-158.
26. Gordon SP, Heisler MG, Reddy GV, Ohno C, Das P, Meyerowitz EM. 2007. Pattern formation during de novo assembly of the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Development 134, 3539-3548.
27. Harberd NP, Belfield E, Yasumura Y. 2009. The angiosperm gibberellin-GID1-DELLA growth regulatory mechanism: how an 'inhibitor of an inhibitor' enables flexible response to fluctuating environments. The Plant Cell 21, 1328-1339.
28. Harlan JR. 1992. Domestication of vegetatively reproduced crops. In: Harlan JR, ed. Crops and man, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, 130-133.
29. Hay A, Craft J, Tsiantis M. 2004. Plant hormones and homeoboxes: bridging the gap? BioEssays 26, 395-404.
30. Hay A, Tsiantis M. 2010. KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 137, 3153-3165.
31. Jasinski S, Tattersall A, Piazza P, Hay A, Martinez-Garcia JF, Schmitz G, Theres K, McCormick S, Tsiantis M. 2008. PROCERA encodes a DELLA protein that mediates control of dissected leaf form in tomato. The Plant Journal 56, 603-612.
32. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW. 1987. GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO Journal 6, 3901-3907.
33. Karnovsky MJ. 1965. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology 27, 137-138.
34. Kauffman JB. 1991. Survival by sprouting following fire in tropical forests of the Eastern Amazon. Biotropica 23, 219-224.
35. Kelly MO, Bradford KJ. 1986. Insensitivity of the diageotropica tomato mutant to auxin. Plant Physiology 82, 713-717.
36. Kim M, Pham T, Hamidi A, McCormick S, Kuzoff RK, Sinha N. 2003. Reduced leaf complexity in tomato wiry mutants suggests a role for PHAN and KNOX gene in generating compound leaves. Development 130, 4405-4415.
37. Koltai H, Bird DM. 2000. Epistatic repression of PHANTASTICA and class 1 KNOTTED genes is uncoupled in tomato. The Plant Journal 22, 455-459.
38. Koornneef M, Bade J, Hanhart C, Horsman K, Schel J, Soppe W, Verkerk R, Zabel P. 1993. Characterization and mapping of a gene controlling shoot regeneration in tomato. The Plant Journal 3, 131-141.
39. Koornneef M, Bosma T DG, Hanhart, CJ, Van der Veen, JH, Zeevaart JAD. 1990. The isolation and characterization of gibberellin-deficient mutants in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80, 852-857.
40. Koornneef M, Hanhart CJ, Martinelli L. 1987. A genetic analysis of cell culture traits in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 74, 633-641.
41. Kut SA, Evans DA. 1982. Plant regeneration from cultured leaf explants of eight wild tomato species and two related Solanum species. In Vitro 18, 593-598.
42. Leyser O. 2009. The control of shoot branching: an example of plant information processing. Plant, Cell and Environment 32, 694-703.
43. Li Y, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ. 1992. Altered morphology in transgenic tobacco plants that overproduce cytokinins in specific tissues and organs. Developmental Biology 153, 386-395.
44. Lima JE, Benedito VA, Figueira A, Peres LEP. 2009. Callus, shoot and hairy root formation in vitro is affected by the sensitivity to auxin and ethylene in tomato mutants. Plant Cell Reports 28, 1169-1177.
45. Lima JE, Carvalho RF, Neto AT, Figueira A, Peres LEP. 2004. Micro-MsK: a tomato genotype with miniature size, short life cycle, and improved in vitro shoot regeneration. Plant Science 167, 753-757.
46. Lincoln C, Long J, Yamaguchi J, Serikawa K, Hake S. 1994. A knotted-like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. The Plant Cell 6, 1859-1876.
47. Martí E, Carrera E, Ruiz-Rivero O, Garcia-Martinez JL. 2010. Hormonal regulation of tomato gibberellin 20-oxidase1 expressed in Arabidopsis. Journal of Plant Physiology 167, 1188-1196.
48. Meissner R, Jacobson Y, Melamed S, Levyatuv S, Shalev G, Ashri A, Elkind Y, Levy A. 1997. A new model system for tomato genetics. The Plant Journal 12, 1465-1472.
49. Miller CO, Skoog F, Von Saltza MH, Strong F. 1955. Kinetin, a cell division factor from deoxyribonucleic acid. Journal of the American Chemical Society 77, 1392.
50. Morris SE, Turnbull CGN, Murfet IC, Beveridge CA. 2001. Mutational analysis of branching in pea. Evidence that Rms1 and Rms5 regulate the same novel signal. Plant Physiology 126, 1205-1213.
51. Motte H, Verstraeten I, Werbrouck S, Geelen D. 2011. CUC2 as an early marker for regeneration competence in Arabidopsis root explants. Journal of Plant Physiology 168, 1598-1601.
52. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473-497.
53. Nebenfuhr A, White TJ, Lomax T. 2000. The diageotropica mutation alters auxin induction of a subset of the Aux/IAA gene family in tomato. Plant Molecular Biology 44, 73-84.
54. Oh K, Ivanchenko MG, White TJ, Lomax TL. 2006. The diageotropica gene of tomato encodes a cyclophilin: a novel player in auxin signaling. Planta 224, 133-144.
55. Parnis A, Cohen O, Gutfinger T, Hareven D, Zamir D, Lifschitz E. 1997. The dominant developmental mutants of tomato, Mouse-ear and Curl, are associated with distinct modes of abnormal transcriptional regulation of a Knotted gene. The Plant Cell 9, 2143-2158.
56. Pattison RJ, Catalá C. 2012. Evaluating auxin distribution in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) through an analysis of the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families. The Plant Journal 70, 585-598.
57. Peres LEP, Carvalho RF, Zsögön A, Bermudez-Zambrano OD, Robles WGR, Tavares S. 2005. Grafting of tomato mutants onto potato rootstocks: an approach to study leaf-derived signaling on tuberization. Plant Science 169, 680-688.
58. Peres LEP, Kerbauy GB. 1999. High cytokinin accumulation following root tip excision changes the endogenous auxin to cytokinin ratio during root-to-shoot conversion in Catasetum fimbriatum Lindl. (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Reports 18, 1002-1006.
59. Peres LEP, Morgante PG, Vechi C, Kraus JE, Van Sluys M-A. 2001. Shoot regeneration capacity from roots and transgenic hairy roots of different tomato cultivars and wild related species. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 65, 37-44.
60. Pino LE, Lombardi-Crestana S, Azevedo MS, Scotton DC, Borgo L, Quecini V, Figueira A, Peres LEP. 2010. The Rg1 allele as a valuable tool for genetic transformation of the tomato Micro-Tom model system. Plant Methods 6, 23.
61. Sakai WS. 1973. Simple method for differential staining of paraffin embedded plant material using toluidine blue O. Stain Technology 48, 247-249.
62. Santos AM, Oliver MJ, Sánchez AM, Payton PR, Gomes JP, Miguel C, Oliveira MM. 2009. An integrated strategy to identify key genes in almond adventitious shoot regeneration. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 4159-4173.
63. Schumacher K, Schmitt T, Rossberg M, Schmitz G, Theres K. 1999. The Lateral suppressor (Ls) gene of tomato encodes a new member of the VHIID protein family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 290-295.
64. Scott J, Harbaugh B. 1989. Micro-Tom: a miniature dwarf tomato. Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 370, 1-6.
65. Sinha NR, Williams RE, Hake S. 1993. Overexpression of the maize homeobox gene, KNOTTED1, causes a switch from determinate to indeterminate cell fates. Genes and Development 7, 787-795.
66. Skoog F, Miller CO. 1957. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 11, 118-131.
67. Smith LG, Jackson D, Hake S. 1995. Expression of knotted1 marks shoot meristem formation during maize embryogenesis. Developmental Genetics 16, 344-348.
68. Sugimoto K, Gordon SP, Meyerowitz EM. 2011. Regeneration in plants and animals: dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, or just differentiation? Trends in Cell Biology 21, 212-218.
69. Sugimoto K, Jiao Y, Meyerowitz EM. 2010. Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Developmental Cell 18, 463-471.
70. Tran Thanh Van M. 1973. Direct flower neoformation from superficial tissue of small explants of Nicotiana tabacum L. Planta 115, 87-92.
71. Ulmasov T, Murfett J, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ. 1997. Aux?IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. The Plant Cell 9, 1963-1971.
72. Valvekens D, Van Montagu M, Van Lijsebettens M. 1988. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants by using kanamycin seletion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 85, 5536-5540.
73. Vasil IK. 2008. A history of plant biotechnology: from the Cell Theory of Schleiden and Schwann to biotech crops. Plant Cell Reports 27, 1423-1440.
74. Visser EJW, Cohen JD, Barendse GWM, Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ. 1996. An ethylene-mediated increase in sensitivity to auxin induces adventitious root formation in flooded Rumex palustris Sm. Plant Physiology 112, 1687-1692.
75. Wang H, Jones B, Li Z, Frasse P, Delalande C, Regad F, Chaabouni S, Latché A, Pech J, Bouzayen M. 2005. The tomato Aux/IAA transcription factor IAA9 is involved in fruit development and leaf morphogenesis. The Plant Cell 17, 2676-2692.
76. Wareing PF. 1982. Determination and related aspects of plant development. In: Smith H, Grierson D, eds. The molecular biology of plant development. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 517-541.
77. White PR. 1934. Potentially unlimited growth of excised tomato root tips in a liquid medium. Plant Physiology 9, 585-600.
78. Zhang J, Chen R, Xiao J, Qian C, Wang T, Li H, Ouyang B, Ye Z. 2007. A single-base deletion mutation in SlIAA9 gene causes tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) entire mutant. Journal of Plant Research 120, 671-678.