The effect of the owner's personality on the behaviour of owner-dog dyads

Interaction Studies

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 373-385

  Kis, Anna ^a   Turcsán, Borbála ^a   Miklósi, Ádám ^a   Gácsi, Márta ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Dog human interaction; Multivariate statistical methods; Personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871015374     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.13.3.03kis     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Altobelli, A., Bressan, E., Feoli, E., Ganis, P., & Martini, F. (2006). Digital representation of spatial variation of multivariate landscape data. Community Ecology, 7(2), 181-188. doi: 10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.2.5.
2. Bourgeois, L., Kenkel, N.C., & Morrison, I.N. (1997). Characterization of cross-resistance patterns in aceryl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Science, 45, 750-755.
3. Braem, M.D., & Mills, D.S. (2010). Factors affecting response of dogs to obedience instruction: A field and experimental study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 125(1-2), 47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.03.004.
4. Cooper, J. (2003). Clever hounds: Social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81(3), 229-244. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00284-8.
5. Elgier, A.M., Jakovcevic, A., Mustaca, A.E., & Bentosela, M. (2009). Learning and owner-stranger effects on interspecific communication in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 81(1), 44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.023.
6. Everitt, B.S. (2009). Multivariable modeling and multivariate analysis for the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-304). CRC Press.
7. Fukuzawa, M., Mills, D.S., & Cooper, J. (2005). More than just a word: Non-semantic command variables affect obedience in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 91(1-2), 129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.025.
8. Funder, D., John, O.P., Robins, R., & Pervin, L. (1997). Handbook of personality (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148.
10. Guisan, A. (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135 (2-3), 147-186. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9.
11. Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.003.
12. Hart, L.A. (1995). Dogs as human companions: A review of the relationship. In J.A. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 161-178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Horn, L., Virányi, Z., Miklósi, Á., Huber, L., & Range, F. (2012). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) flexibly adjust their human-directed behavior to the actions of their human partners in a problem situation. Animal Cognition, 15(1), 57-71. doi: 10.1007/s10071-011-0432-3.
14. John, O.P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research.
15. Kotrschal, K., Schöberl, I., Bauer, B., Thibeaut, A.-M., & Wedl, M. (2009). Dyadic relationships and operational performance of male and female owners and their male dogs. Behavioural Processes, 81(3), 383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.04.001.
16. Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
17. Lang, F.R., Lüdtke, O., & Asendorpf, J.B. (2001). Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-Aged and old adults. Diagnostica, 47, 111-121.
18. Marshall-Pescini, S., Passalacqua, C., Barnard, S., Valsecchi, P., & Prato-Previde, E. (2009). Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs' behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks. Behavioural Processes, 81(3), 416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.015.
19. Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2004). Comparative social cognition: What can dogs teach us? Animal Behaviour, 67(6), 995-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.008.
20. Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2012). On the utilisation of social animals as a model for social robotics. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1-10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00075.
21. Mitchell, R.W., & Edmonson, E. (1999). Functions of repetitive talk to dogs during play: Control, conversation, or planning? Society and Animals, 7(1), 55-81. BRILL.
22. Mitchell, R.W., & Thompson, N.S. (1986). Deception in play between dogs and people. In R.W. Mitchell & N.S. Thompson (Eds.), Deception. Perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit (pp. 193-205). State University of New York Press.
23. Mitchell, R.W., & Thompson, N.S. (1990). The effects of familiarity on dog-human play. Anthrozoös, 4(1), 24-43. Berg Publishers.
24. Mitchell, R.W., & Thompson, N.S. (1991). Projects, routines, and enticements in dog-human play. In P.P.G. Bateson & P.H. Klopfer (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology Vol. 9 human understanding and animal awareness (pp. 189-216). New York and London: Plenum Press.
25. Naderi, S., Miklósi, Á., Dóka, A., & Csányi, V. (2001). Co-operative interactions between blind persons and their dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 74(1), 59-80. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00152-6.
26. Overall, K.L. (2000). Natural animal models of human psychiatric conditions: Assessment of mechanism and validity. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 24(5), 727-776.
27. Podberscek, A.L., & Serpell, J.A. (1997). Aggressive behaviour in English cocker spaniels and the personality of their owners. Veterinary Record, 141, 73-76.
28. Podberscek, A.L., Paul, E., & Serpell, J.A. (2000). Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp. 1-335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Prato-Previde, E., Custance, D.M., Spiezio, C., & Sabatini, F. (2003). Is the dog-human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth's strange situation. Behaviour, 140, 225-254.
30. Prato-Previde, E., Marshall-Pescini, S., & Valsecchi, P. (2008). Is your choice my choice? The owners' effect on pet dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task. Animal Cognition, 11(1), 167-74. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0102-7.
31. Robinson, I. (1995). The waltham book of human-Animal interaction: Benefits and responsibilities of pet ownership (pp. 1-148). Kidlington: Pergamon Press.
32. Rooney, N.J., Bradshaw, J.W.S., & Robinson, I.H. (2001). Do dogs respond to play signals given by humans? Animal Behaviour, 61(4), 715-722. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1661.
33. Serpell, J.A. (1996). Evidence for an association between pet behavior and owner attachment levels. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47 (1-2), 49-60. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)01010-6.
34. Serpell, J.A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection-Beyond the "Cute Response." Society and Animals, 11(1), 83-100. doi: 10.1163/156853003321618864.
35. Syrdal, D.S., Koay, K.L., Gácsi, M., Walters, M.L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2010). Video prototyping of dog-inspired non-verbal affective communication for an appearance constrained robot. 9th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Viareggio, Italy.
36. Thrun, S. (2004). Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 9-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2-2.
37. Tinya, F., Márialigeti, S., Király, I., Németh, B., & Ódor, P. (2009). The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixed forests in rség, Western Hungary. Plant Ecology, 204(1), 69-81. doi: 10.1007/s11258-008-9566-z.
38. Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., & Csányi, V. (1997). Dog-human relationship affects problem solving behavior in the dog. Anthrozoös, 10(4), 214-224. doi: 10.2752/089279397787000987.
39. Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Csányi, V., & Dóka, A. (1998). Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(3), 219-229. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.219.
40. Turcsán, B., Kubinyi, E., Virányi, Z., & Range, F. (2011). Personality matching in owner-dog dyads. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 6(1), 77. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.09.016.
41. Wedl, M., Schöberl, I., Bauer, B., Day, J., & Kotrschal, K. (2010). Relational factors affecting dog social attraction to human partners. Interaction Studies, 11(3), 482-503. doi: 10.1075/is.11.3.09wed.
42. Wickler, W. (1976). The ethological analysis of attachment: Sociometric, motivational and sociophysiological aspects. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 42(1), 12-28.
43. Wollenberg, A.L. (1977). Redundancy analysis an alternative for canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika, 42(2), 207-219. doi: 10.1007/BF02294050.