Blogging within a social networking site as a form of literature response in a teacher education course

Educational Media International

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 263-275

  Hutchison, Amy ^a   Wang, Wei ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

blog; literacy; Ning; social network; technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871002592     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2012.741197     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arrington, M. 2005. 85% of college students use Facebook. TechCrunch, 7 september: 2005
2. Castek, J., Leu, D.J. Jr., Coiro, J., Gort, M., Henry, L.A. and Lima, C. 2007. "Developing new literacies among multilingual learners in the elementary grades". In Technology mediated learning environments for young English learners: In and out of school connections, Edited by: Parker, L.L. 111-153. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(6). Retrieved fromhttp://www.readingonline.org/electronic/elec_index.asp?HREF=/electronic/RT/2-03_column/index.html
4. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. and Leu, D. 2008. Handbook of new literacies, New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Duke, N.K. 2000. 3.6 min per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 35: 202-224.
7. Dye, J.F., Schatz, I.M., Rosenberg, B.A., & Coleman, S.T. (2000, January). Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data. The qualitative report [Online]. Vol. 4, Numbers 1/2. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-1/dye.html
8. Flood, J. and Lapp, D. 1995. "Broadening the tens: Toward an expanded conceptualization of literacy". In Perspectives on literacy research and practice, Edited by: Hinchman, K.A., Leu, D.J. and Kinzer, C.K. 1-16. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
9. Franklin, C. 2007. Factors that influence elementary teachers' use of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2): 267-293.
10. Heo, M. 2009. Digital storytelling: An empirical study of the impact of digital storytelling on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy and dispositions towards educational technology. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(4): 405-428.
11. Hutchison, A. (2009). A national survey of teachers on their perceptions, challenges, and uses of information and communication technology (Ph.D. dissertation, Clemson University, United States -- South Carolina). Retrieved January 4, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I. (Publication No. AAT 3355144).
12. Hutchison, A. and Henry, L. 2010. Internet use and online reading among middle-grade students at risk of dropping out of school. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(2): 61-76.
13. Hutchison, A. and Reinking, D. 2010. "A national survey of barriers to integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction". In Fifty-ninth yearbook of the national reading conference, Edited by: Jimenez, R., Risko, V., Hundley, M. and Rowe, D. 230-243. Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.
14. Hutchison, A. and Reinking, D. 2011. Teachers' perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the U.S. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4): 308-329.
15. Jones, S., & Fox, S. (2009, January 28). Generations online in 2009. Pew Internet & American life project. Retrieved fromhttp://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Generations-Online-in-2009.aspx
16. Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. 2003. New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning, Buckingham: Open University Press.
17. Lenhart, A.M. and Madden, M. 2005. Teen content creators and consumers, Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
18. Leu, D., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J. and Cammack, D. 2004. "Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies". In Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5th ed., Edited by: Rudell, R.B. and Unrau, N. 1570-1613. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
19. Moreillon, J. 2009. Collaborative strategies for teaching reading comprehension, Chicago, IL: ALA Editions.
20. Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological research methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Neiderhauser, D.S., & Shapiro, A. (2003, April). Learner variables associated with reading and learning in a hypertext environment. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
22. Prensky, M. 2006. Don't bother me mom-I'm learning: How computer and video games are preparing your kids for twenty-first century success-and how you can help!, St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
23. Zawilinski, L. 2009. HOT blogging: A framework for blogging to promote higher order thinking. Reading Teacher, 62(8): 650-661.