Simulator based angiography education in neurosurgery: Results of a pilot educational program

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 438-441

  Fargen, Kyle Michael ^a   Siddiqui, Adnan H ^b   Veznedaroglu, Erol ^c   Turner, Raymond D ^d   Ringer, Andrew J ^e   Mocco, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c Capital Health System   (United States)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FACULTY PRACTICE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; NEUROSURGERY; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SIMULATOR;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; NEUROSURGERY; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 84870954188     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010128     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, et al. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 2003;78:783-8. (Pubitemid 36993078)
2. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27:10-28. (Pubitemid 40514851)
3. Desser TS. Simulation-based training: the next revolution in radiology education? J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4:816-24. (Pubitemid 47615603)
4. Gould DA. Interventional radiology simulation: prepare for a virtual revolution in training. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007;18:483-90. (Pubitemid 46552256)
5. Tsang JS, Naughton PA, Leong S, et al. Virtual reality simulation in endovascular surgical training. Surgeon 2008;6:214-20.
6. Bose A, Henkes H, Alfke K, et al. The Penumbra System: a mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke due to thromboembolism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1409-13.
7. Mazzola CA, Lobel DA, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Efficacy of neurosurgery resident education in the new millennium: the 2008 Council of State Neurosurgical Societies post-residency survey results. Neurosurgery 2010;67:225-32.
8. Bath J, Lawrence P. Why we need open simulation to train surgeons in an era of work-hour restrictions. Vascular 2011;19:175-7.
9. Lemole GM Jr, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, et al. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 2007;61:142-8. (Pubitemid 47356487)
10. Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 2009;23:1693-700.
11. Botden SM, Torab F, Buzink SN, et al. The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1214-22. (Pubitemid 351624378)
12. Bech B, Lonn L, Falkenberg M, et al. Construct validity and reliability of structured assessment of endovascular expertise in a simulated setting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;42:539-48.
13. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Choong A, et al. Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:855-63. (Pubitemid 350011212)
14. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Malik I, et al. Validation of video-based skill assessment in carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;38:1-9.
15. Dayal R, Faries PL, Lin SC, et al. Computer simulation as a component of catheter-based training. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:1112-17. (Pubitemid 40037278)
16. Tedesco MM, Pak JJ, Harris EJ Jr, et al. Simulation-based endovascular skills assessment: the future of credentialing? J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1008-14.
17. Chaer RA, Derubertis BG, Lin SC, et al. Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: results of a randomized, controlled study. Ann Surg 2006; 244:343-52.
18. Dawson DL. Training in carotid artery stenting: do carotid simulation systems really help? Vascular 2006;14:256-63. (Pubitemid 44851366)
19. Botden SM, de Hingh IH, Jakimowicz JJ. Meaningful assessment method for laparoscopic suturing training in augmented reality. Surg Endosc 2009;23:2221-8.
20. Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R, Neequaye S, et al. Experienced endovascular interventionalists objectively improve their skills by attending carotid artery stent training courses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;35:541-50. (Pubitemid 351469947)
21. Gould D. Using simulation for interventional radiology training. Br J Radiol 2010; 83:546-53.
22. Gould DA, Kessel DO, Healey AE, et al. Simulators in catheter-based interventional radiology: training or computer games? Clin Radiol 2006;61:556-61. (Pubitemid 43899336)
23. Strozyk D, Hanft SJ, Kellner CP, et al. Training in endovascular surgical neuroradiology. World Neurosurg 2010;74:28-31.
24. Berry M, Lystig T, Reznick R, et al. Assessment of a virtual interventional simulator trainer. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13:237-43. (Pubitemid 44811733)
25. Ahmed K, Keeling AN, Fakhry M, et al. Role of virtual reality simulation in teaching and assessing technical skills in endovascular intervention. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:55-66.