Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: A grounded theory study

Spinal Cord

Volumn 50, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 908-914

  Ripat, J D ^a   Woodgate, R L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; grounded theory; qualitative methods; self perceived participation; spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY ENVIRONMENT INTERFACE; CANADA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GROUNDED THEORY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SELF PERCEIVED PARTICIPATION; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANITOBA; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870953293     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: 14765624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.77     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Rick Hansen Institute and Urban Futures. The incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: overview and estimates based on current evidence. Retrieved 23 February 2011 from http://www.urbanfutures.com/reports/Report%2080. pdf, 2010.
2. Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 970-974.
3. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Boschen KA. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement. JNeurol Phys Ther 2005; 29: 147-156.
4. Cicerone KD. Participation as an outcome of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 494-501.
5. Dijkers MPJM, Whiteneck G, El-Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: S63-S80.
6. Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, Morgan E. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006; 13: 43-58.
7. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Retrieved on 8 March 2011 from http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/, 2001.
8. Carpenter C, Forwell SJ, Jongbloed LE, Backman CL. Community participation after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 427-433.
9. Harris F. Conceptual issues in the measurement of participation among wheeled mobility device users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007; 2: 137-148.
10. Anderson CJ, Vogel LC, Betz RR, Willis KM. Overview of adult outcomes in pediatriconset spinal cord injuries: implications for transition to adulthood. J Spinal Cord Med 2004; 17(Suppl 1): S98-S106.
11. Lund ML, Nordlund A, Bernspang B, Lexell J. Perceived participation and problems in participation are determinants of life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1417-1422.
12. Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1793-1803.
13. Lysack C, Komanecky M, Kabel A, Cross K, Neufeld S. Environmental factors and their role in community integration after spinal cord injury. Can J Occup Ther 2007; 74: 243-254.
14. Ward K, Mitchell J, Price P. Occupation-based practice and its relationship to social and occupational participation in adults with spinal cord injury. OTJR 2007; 27: 149-156.
15. Van de Velde D, Bracke P, Van Hove G, Josephsson S, Vanderstraeten G. Perceived participation, experiences from persons with spinal cord injury in their transition period from hospital to home. Int J Rehab Res 2010; 33: 346-355.
16. Newman SD. Evidence-based advocacy: using photovoice to identify barriers and facilitators to community participation after spinal cord injury. Rehabil Nurs 2010; 35: 47-59.
17. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 1445-1460.
18. Dietz ML, Prus RC, Shaffir W. Doing Everyday Life: Ethnography as Human Lived Experience. Copp Clark Longman Ltd.: Missisauga, ON, 1994.
19. Prus R. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, 1996.
20. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, 2006.
21. Wang C, Burris MA. Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Educ Behav 1997; 24: 369-387.
22. Dahan R, Dick R, Moll S, Salwach E, Sherman D, Vengris J et al. Photovoice Hamilton 2007: Manual and resource kit, 2007, http://photovoice.ca/ manual.pdf.
23. Law M, MacDermid J. Evidence-Based Rehabilitation: A Guide to Practice. SLACK Incorporated: Thorofare, 2008.
24. Burbank PM, Martins D. Symbolic interactionism and critical perspective: divergent or synergistic? Nurs Philos 2009; 11: 25-41.
25. Brown M. Participation: the insider's perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: S34-S37.
26. van de Ven L, Post M, de Witte L, van den Heuvel W. Strategies for autonomy used by people with cervical spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 249-260.
27. van de Ven L, Post M, de Witte L, van den Heuvel W. It takes two to tango: The integration of people with disabilities into society. Disabil Soc 2005; 20: 311-329.
28. Boschen KA, Tonack M, Gargaro J. Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehab Res 2003; 26: 157-164.
29. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Boschen KA. Interaction of environment with individual characteristics and social participation: theoretical perspectives and applications in persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2002; 7: 1-16.
30. Corbin J, Strauss A. Accompaniments of chronic illness: changes in body, self, biography, and biographical time. Res Sociol Health Care 1987; 6: 249-281.
31. Wee J, Paterson M. Exploring how factors impact the activities and participation of persons with disability: constructing a model through grounded theory. Qual Rep 2009; 14: 165-200.
32. Hammell KW. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord 2007; 45: 124-139.
33. Ville I, Crost M, Ravaud JF. Disability and a sense of community belonging a study among tetraplegic spinal-cord-injured persons in France. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 321-332.
34. Semple K, Blowes B, Seggles E, Baptiste S. Inclusive environments: The role of occupational therapy. Occup Ther Now 2010; 12: 16-18.
35. Oliver M. Theories in health care and research: theories of disability in health practice and research. Br Med J 1998; 317: 1446-1449.
36. Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illness 1982; 4: 167-182.
37. Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: An overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: S5-S16.
38. Brown M, Dijkers MPJM, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 459-481.