Conceptual issues in the measurement of participation among wheeled mobility device users

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 137-148

  Harris, Frances ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

ICF; outcomes; Participation; wheelchair

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; DISABLED PERSON; HUMAN; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICS; WHEELCHAIR;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; WHEELCHAIRS;

EID: 43949140126     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17483100701374363     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. N.O.o.D., Harris Survey. Washington, DC: National Organization of Disability (NOD); 2000.
2. Kaye HS, Kang T, LaPlante MP. Disability statistics report: mobility device use in the United States. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education; 2000.
3. LaPlante HG, Moss AJ. Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: prevalence, payment, need, and trends. Adv Data 1992;217:1-11.
4. WHO, W.H.O., ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2001.
5. Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Rigby P, Letts L. The Person-Environment- Occupation Model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther 1996;63:9-23.
6. Rebiero K. Enabling occupation: the importance of an affirming environment. Can J Occup Ther 2001;68:80-89.
7. Lawton M, Nahemow, L. Ecology and the aging process. In: Eisdorfer M, editor. The psychology of adult development and aging. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1973. pp 619-674.
8. French J, Rodgers W, Cobb S. Adjustment as Personenvironment fit. In: Coelho D, Adams J, editors. Coping and adaptation. New York: Basic Books; 1974. pp 316-333.
9. Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions related to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:145-153.
10. Shumway-Cook A. Environmental components of mobility disability in community-living older Persons. J Am Geriatrics Soc 2003;51:393-398.
11. Keysor JJ. Appendix D: how does the environment influence disability? Examining the evidence. In: Field M, Jette A, Martin L, editors. Workshop on disability in America: a new look. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006. pp 88-100.
12. Sanford J, Story M, Jones M. An analysis of the effects of ramp slope on people with mobility impairments. Assist Technol 1997;9:22-33.
13. Gray D. Mobility impaired individuals with secondary conditions: health, participation and environments. In: Final report submitted to Office of Disability and Health. Washington, DC: CDC; 2003.
14. Gray D, Hendershot G. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(2):S10-S14.
15. Meyers A, Anderson JJ, Miller DR, Shipp K, Hoenig H. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:1437-1448.
16. Jette A, Badley E. Chapter 2: conceptual issues in the measurement of work disability. In: Mathiowetz N, Wunderlich GS, editors. Survey measurement of work disability: summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
17. Djikers M, Whiteneck G, El-Jaroudi R. Measures of social outcomes in disability research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S63-S80.
18. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Post M, Asano M. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement. J Neurolog Phys Ther 2005;29(3):147-156.
19. Nagi S. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman M, editor. American sociological association. Washington, DC: Sociology and Rehabilitation; 1965. pp 100-113.
20. Jette A, Haley S, Kooyoomjian J. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003;35: 145-149.
21. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday: Garden City; 1959.
22. Goffman E. Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1963.
23. Friedson E. Disability as social deviance, sociology and rehabilitation: a structural approach. New York, NY: Doss, Mean and Co.; 1965.
24. Moser I. Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity, and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication & Society 2006;9(3): 373-395.
25. Goggin G, Newell C. Digital disability: the social construction of disability in new media. Lanham and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield; 2003.
26. Nelson N, Wright S. Power and participatory development: theory and practice. London: ITDG; 1995.
27. Chambers R. Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development. In: Nelson N, Write S, editors. Power and participatory development. London: Intermediate Technology Publications; 1995.
28. Fals-Boroda O, Rahman M, editors. Action and knowledge: breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. New York: Apex; 1991.
29. Seelman K. Katherine Seelman on participatory action research. Innovator 1997;2(2):1.
30. Schriner K. Participatory action research in rehabilitation policy and practice. In: Forging collaborative partnerships in the study of disability: A NIDRR conference on participatory action research. Washington, DC; 1995.
31. Jette A, Haley S. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med 2005;37: 339-345.
32. Smith RO, Jansen C, Seitz J, Rust KL. The ICF in the context of assistive technology (AT) interventions and outcome. ATOMS Project Technical Report. http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/icf.html, 2006.
33. Lenker J, Jutai J. Assistive technology outcomes research and clinical practice: what role for the ICF. Canadian Institute for Health Information. http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/icf-jun02-papers-6A-e.pdf, 2002.
34. Fuhrer MJ, Jutai J, Scherer MJ, De Rutyer F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25(22):1243-1251.
35. Willer B, Ottenbacher JJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire: a comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73(2):103-111.
36. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:519-526.
37. Noreau L, Derosiers J, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogilosi C. Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(6):346-352.
38. Jette A, Haley SM, Coster WJ, Kooyoomjian JT, Levenson S, Heeren JA. Late life function and disability instrument: I. Development and evaluation of the disability component. J Gerontol Med Sci 2002;57A:M209-M216.
39. Gray D, Hollingsworth H, Morgan K. Group differences in community participation by mobility device use. Atlanta, GA: RESNA; 2006.
40. Cardol M, De Haan RJ, De Jong B, van Den Bos GA, de Groot JM. Psychometric properties of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:210-216.
41. Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatx T, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;19:459-481.
42. Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS, Das Pattanayak RK. The participation scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28(4):193-203.
43. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27(9):507-528.
44. Rust KL, Smith RO. Assistive technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes: a review and analysis of instruments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84(10):780-793.
45. Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. Optimal participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006;29(19): 1231-1235.
46. Perenboom RJM, Chorus AMJ. Measuring participation according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25(11-12): 577-587.
47. Desrosiers J. Participation and occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2005;72(4):195-203.
48. Cardol M, deJong B, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(18):970-974.
49. Gray D, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. PARTS/M: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87(2):189-197.
50. Rust KL, Smith RO. Technical report-the inclusion of assistive technology outcomes in current health and rehabilitation outcome measures (Version 1.0). In: R2D2 Center at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, www.r2d2.uwm.edu. 2004.
51. Reindal S. Independence, dependence, interdependence: some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disabil Soc 1999;14(3):353-367.
52. Giacomini M, Cook D. A user's guide to qualitative research in health care. J Am Med Assoc 2000;284(4):478-482.
53. Burchfield RW, editor. The compact Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1989.
54. Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from Person to Person: introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(1-3):1-4.
55. Pape TL, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(1-3):5-20.
56. Putnam M, Geenen S, Powers L, Saxton M, Finney S, Dautel P. Health and wellness: people with disabilities discuss barriers and facilitators to well being. J Rehabil 2003;69(1):37-45.
57. Kim-Rupnow W. Disability and Korean culture. In: Stone JH, editor. Culture and disability: providing culturally competent services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
58. Saadah MA. Clinical commentary: on autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(18):977-982.
59. Moser I. On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: the multiple modes of ordering disability and their interferences. Cultural Studies 2005;19(6):667-700.
60. Dijkers M. Letter to the Editor: comments on van Brakel et al.'s Participation Scale. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28(21): 1360-1362.
61. Schwarz N. Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 1999;54(2):93-105.
62. Harrison DA, McLaughlin ME, Coalter TM. Context, cognition, and common method variance: Psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996;68:246-261.
63. Schwarz N, Bienias J. What mediates the impact of response alternatives on frequency reports of mundane behaviors? Appl Cognit Psychol 1990;4:61-72.
64. Pepper S. Problems in the quantification of frequency expressions. In: Fiske D, editor. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1981. pp 25-41.
65. Westerterp K. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers. Int J Obesity 1999;23:S45-S49.
66. Bassett D, Cureton A, Ainsworth B. Measurement of daily walking distance: questionnaire versus pedometer. Med Sci Sports Exercise 2002;32(5):1018-1023.
67. Washburn R, Copay A. Assessing physical activity during wheelchair pushing: validity of a portable accelerometer. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 1999;16:290-299.
68. Wolf J, Guensler R, Washington S, Frank L. The use of electronic travel diaries and vehicle instrumentation packages in the year 2000 Atlanta Regional Household Travel Survey. In: Personal travel: the long and short of IT. Washington, DC: The Transportation Research Board; 1999 (Report).
69. Wolf J. Applications of new technologies in travel surveys. In: International Conference on Transport Survey Quality and Innovation. Costa Rica; 2004.
70. Wagner D. Global positioning systems for personal travel surveys: Lexington area travel data collection test. In: Report to the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DOT. Washington, DC: Battelle Transportation Division; September 1997.
71. Stopher P. Using passive GPS as a means to improve spatial travel data. In: 7th International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies to Transportation. Cambridge, MA; 2001.
72. Wolf J, Oliveira M, Thompson M. The impact of trip underreporting on VMT and travel time estimates: preliminary findings fromtheCalifornia StatewideHousehold Travel Survey GPS Study. In: Proceedings of the 82th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC; 2003.
73. Stopher P, Bullock P, Horst F. Conducting a GPS Survey with a time-use diary. In: Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC; 2003.
74. Hoenig H, Pieper C, Zolkewitz M, Schenkman M, Branch LG. Wheelchair users are not necessarily wheelchair bound. J Am Geriatric Soc 2002;50(4):645-654.
75. Hoenig H, Landerman LR, Shipp K, Pieper C, Richardson M, Pahel N, George L. A clinical trial of a rehabilitation expert clinician versus usual care for providing manual wheelchairs. J Am Geriatric Soc 2005;53(10):1712-1720.
76. Hoenig H, Landerman LR, Shipp K, George L. Activity restriction among wheelchair users. J Am Geriatrics Soc 2003;51(9):1244-1251.
77. Routhier F, Vincent C, Derosiers J, Nadeau S. Mobility of wheelchair users: a proposed performance assessment framework. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:19-34.
78. Glaser B. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mills Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992.
79. Holm M, Rogers J, Stone R. Person-task-environment interventions: a decision making guide. In: Crepeau E, Cohen E, Schell B, editors. Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2003. pp 460-490.
80. Shumway-Cook A, Patla A, Stewart AL, Ferrucci L, Ciol MA, Guralnik JM. Assessing environmentally determined mobility disability: self-report versus observed community mobility. J Am Geriatrics Soc 2005;53(4):700.
81. Keysor JJ, Jette A, Haley S. Development of the home and community environment (HACE) instrument. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:37-44.