Steady-state MEG responses elicited by a sequence of amplitude-modulated short tones of different carrier frequencies

Hearing Research

Volumn 296, Issue , 2013, Pages 25-35

  Kuriki, Shinya ^a   Kobayashi, Yusuke ^a   Kobayashi, Takanari ^a   Tanaka, Keita ^a   Uchikawa, Yoshinori ^a  

^a TOKYO DENKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND PRESSURE; STEADY STATE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIODICITY; PRESSURE; REACTION TIME; SOUND; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870883753     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ahveninen J., Jääskeläinen I.P., Raij T., Bonmassar G., Devore S., Hämäläinen M., Levänen S., Lin F.H., Sams M., Shinn-Cunningham B.G., Witzel T., Belliveau J.W. Task-modulated " what" and " where" pathways in human auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:14608-14613.
2. Bartlett E.L., Wang X. Primate long-lasting modulation by stimulus context in auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:83-104.
3. Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E., Rennie C., Michie P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1998, 31:51-68.
4. Deutsch D. An auditory illusion. Nature 1974, 251:307-309.
5. Deutsch D. Two-channel listening to musical scales. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1975, 57:1156-1160.
6. Eggermont J.J. Temporal modulation transfer functions in cat primary auditory cortex: separating stimulus effects from neural mechanisms. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, 87:305-321.
7. Engelien A., Schulz M., Ross B., Arolt V., Pantev C. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear. Res. 2000, 148:153-160.
8. Fujiki N., Jousmäki V., Hari R. Neuromagnetic responses to frequency-tagged sounds: a new method to follow inputs from each ear to the human auditory cortex during binaural hearing. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:1-4.
9. Fullerton B.C., Pandya D.N. Architectonic analysis of the auditory-related areas of the superior temporal region in human brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2007, 504:470-498.
10. Gabriel D., Veuillet E., Ragot R., Schwartz D., Ducorps A., Norena A., Durrant J.D., Bonmartin A., Cotton F., Collet L. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex. Hear. Res. 2004, 197:55-64.
11. Galaburda A., Sanides F. Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 1980, 190:597-610.
12. Galambos R. Tactile and auditory stimuli repeated at high rates (30-50 per sec) produce similar event related potentials. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1982, 388:722-728.
13. Galambos R., Makeig S., Talmachoff P.J. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1981, 78:2643-2647.
14. Hackett T.A., Preuss T.M., Kaas J.H. Architectonic identification of the core region in auditory cortex of macaques, chimpanzees, and humans. J. Comp. Neurol. 2001, 441:197-222.
15. Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M., Picton T.W. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr. 2002, 15:69-86.
16. Jääskeläinen I.P., Ahveninen J., Bonmassar G., Dale A.M., Ilmoniemi R.J., Levänen S., Lin F.H., May P., Melcher J., Stufflebeam S., Tiitinen H., Belliveau J.W. Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:6809-6814.
17. Johnson B.W., Weinberg H., Ribary U., Cheyne D.O., Ancill R. Topographic distribution of the 40 Hz auditory evoked-related potential in normal and aged subjects. Brain Topogr. 1988, 1:117-121.
18. Johnson D.H. The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1980, 68:1115-1122.
19. Joris P.X., Yin T.C. Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 91:215-232.
20. Kaneko K., Fujiki N., Hari R. Binaural interaction in the human auditory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic frequency tagging: no effect of stimulus intensity. Hear. Res. 2003, 183:1-6.
21. Krishna B.S., Semple M.N. Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 2000, 84:255-273.
22. Kuriki S., Nogai T., Hirata Y. Cortical sources of middle latency responses of auditory evoked magnetic field. Hear. Res. 1995, 92:47-51.
23. Kuriki S., Kanda S., Hirata Y. Effects of musical experience on different components of MEG responses elicited by sequential piano-tones and chords. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:4046-4053.
24. Lamminmäki S., Hari R. Auditory cortex activation associated with octave illusion. Neuroreport 2000, 11:1469-1472.
25. Lamminmaki S., Mandel A., Parkkonen L., Hari R. Binaural interaction and the octave illusion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 132:1747-1753.
26. Lee Y.S., Lueders H., Dinner D.S., Lesser R.P., Hahn J., Klem G. Recording of auditory evoked potentials in man using chronic subdural electrodes. Brain 1984, 107(1):115-131.
27. Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C., Moran L.M., Perez-Abalo M.C., Martin V., Savio G. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear. Hear. 1996, 17:81-96.
28. Mäkelä, J.P., Hari R. Evidence for cortical origin of the 40 Hz auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 66:539-546.
29. Näätänen R., Sams M., Alho K., Paavilainen P., Reinikainen K., Sokolov E.N. Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 69:523-531.
30. Nishimura T., Nakagawa S., Sakaguchi T., Hosoi H., Tonoike M. Effect of masker frequency on N1m amplitude in forward masking. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 2004, 553:33-35.
31. Palmer A.R., Russell I.J. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hear. Res. 1986, 24:1-15.
32. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear. Res. 1996, 101:62-74.
33. Pantev C., Elbert T., Makeig S., Hampson S., Eulitz C., Hoke M. Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1993, 88:389-396.
34. Patel A.D., Balaban E. Temporal patterns of human cortical activity reflect tone sequence structure. Nature 2000, 404:80-84.
35. Picton T.W., Dimitrijevic A., Perez-Abalo M.C., Van Roon P. Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2005, 16:140-156.
36. Presacco A., Bohórquez J., Yavuz E., Ozdamar O. Auditory steady-state responses to 40-Hz click trains: relationship to middle latency, gamma band and beta band responses studied with deconvolution. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121:1540-1550.
37. Preuss A., Müller-Preuss P. Processing of amplitude modulated sounds in the medial geniculate body of squirrel monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 1990, 79:207-211.
38. Rees A., Green G.G., Kay R.H. Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear. Res. 1986, 23:123-133.
39. Reite M., Teale P., Rojas D.C., Reite E., Asherin R., Hernandez O. MEG auditory evoked fields suggest altered structural/functional asymmetry in primary but not secondary auditory cortex in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2009, 11:371-381.
40. Romani G.L., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L., Brenner D. Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the neuromagnetic method. Exp. Brain Res. 1982, 47:381-393.
41. Rosburg T., Zimmerer K., Huonker R. Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 205:559-570.
42. Ross B., Borgmann C., Draganova R., Roberts L.E., Pantev C. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:679-691.
43. Ross B., Draganova R., Picton T.W., Pantev C. Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Hear. Res. 2003, 186:57-68.
44. Ross B., Herdman A.T., Pantev C. Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:4082-4093.
45. Ross B., Picton T.W., Pantev C. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear. Res. 2002, 165:68-84.
46. Ross J., Tervaniemi M., Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of the octave illusion: electrophysiological evidence for central origin. Neuroreport 1996, 8:303-306.
47. Scherf F., Brokx J., Wuyts F.L., Van de Heyning P.H. The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry. Int. J. Audiol. 2006, 45:281-286.
48. Schreiner C.E., Urbas J.V. Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields. Hear. Res. 1988, 32:49-63.
49. Simpson M.I., Woods W.P., Prendergast G., Johnson S.R., Green G.G. Stimulus variability affects the amplitude of the auditory steady-state response. PLoS One 2012, 7:e34668. Epub.
50. Soeta Y., Nakagawa S. Auditory evoked responses in human auditory cortex to the variation of sound intensity in an ongoing tone. Hear. Res. 2012, 287:67-75.
51. Spydell J.D., Pattee G., Goldie W.D. The 40 Hertz auditory event-related potential: normal values and effects of lesions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 62:193-202.
52. Steinmann I., Gutschalk A. Potential fMRI correlates of 40-Hz phase locking in primary auditory cortex, thalamus and midbrain. Neuroimage 2011, 54:495-504.
53. Thaerig S., Behne N., Schadow J., Lenz D., Scheich H., Brechmann A., Herrmann C.S. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 67:235-241.
54. Tansley B.W., Suffield J.B. Time course of adaptation and recovery of channels selectively sensitive to frequency and amplitude modulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1983, 74:765-775.
55. Wienbruch C., Paul I., Weisz N., Elbert T., Roberts L.E. Frequency organization of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in normal hearing and in tinnitus. Neuroimage 2006, 33:180-194.