Use of concept mapping in an undergraduate introductory exercise physiology course

American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 197-206

  Henige, Kim ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

General models; Physiology education; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870871170     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00001.2012     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 2max: essentials of the most widely used test in exercise physiology. ACSM Health Fit J 8: 5-9, 2004.
2. Bentley FJB, Kennedy S, Semsar K. How not to lose your students with concept maps. J Coll Sci Teach 41: 61-68, 2011.
3. Briscoe C, LaMaster SU. Meaningful learning in college biology through concept mapping. Am Biol Teach 53: 214-219, 1991.
4. Hopper M. Student enrollment in a supplement course for anatomy and physiology results in improved retention and success. J Coll Sci Teach 40: 70-79, 2011.
5. Gonzalez HL, Palencia AP, Umana LA, Galindo Villafrade MLA L. Mediated learning experience and concept maps: a pedagogical tool for achieving meaningful learning in medical physiology students. Adv Physiol Educ 32: 312-316, 2008.
6. Michael J. What makes physiology hard for students to learn? Results of a faculty survey. Adv Physiol Educ 31: 34-40, 2007.
7. Michael J, McFarland J. The core principles ("big ideas") of physiology: results of faculty surveys. Adv Physiol Educ 35: 336-341, 2011.
8. Michael J, Modell H, McFarland J, Cliff W. The "core principles" of physiology: what should students understand? Adv Physiol Educ 33: 10-16, 2009.
9. Modell HI. How to help students understand physiology? Emphasize general models. Adv Physiol Educ 23: 101-107, 2000.
10. Modell HI. Preparing students to participate in an active learning environment. Adv Physiol Educ 15: 69-77, 1996.
11. Nesbit JC, Adesope OO. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 76: 413-448, 2006.
12. Novak JD. The promise of new ideas and new technology for improving teaching and learning. Cell Biol Educ 2: 122-132, 2003.
13. Novak JD, Canas AJ. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01, Rev. 01-2008. Pensacola, FL: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2008.
14. Santrock JW. Educational Psychology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
15. West DC, Pomeroy JR, Park JK, Gertenberger EA, Sandoval J. Critical thinking in graduate medical education: a role for concept mapping assessment? JAMA 284: 1105-1110, 2000.
16. Yin Y, Vanides J, Ruiz-Primo MA, Ayala CC, Shavelson RJ. Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. J Res Sci Teach 42: 166-184, 2005.