About the joint action theory in didactics

Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 503-516

  Sensevy, Gérard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE OCCIDENTALE   (France)

Author keywords

Didactic contract; Didactic game; Didactic milieu; Epistemic games; Grammar of action; Learning games

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870867293     PISSN: 1434663X     EISSN: 18625215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11618-012-0305-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brousseau, G. (1997). The theory of didactic situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: kluwer.
2. Bruner, J. (1977). Early social interaction and language acquisition. In H. R. Schaffer (ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp. 271-289). New York: Academic Press.
3. Chevallard, Y. (2007). Readjusting didactics to a changing epistemology. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 131-134.
4. Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dewey, J. (1920/2004). Reconstruction in Philosophy. Mineola: Doves price.
6. Dewey, J. (1938/2008). John Dewey the later works, 1925-1953: 1938, Logic: The theory of inquiry (1st ed.). Chicago: Southern Illinois University Press.
7. Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
8. Eilan, N., Hoert, C., Teresa, M., & Johannes, R. (2005). Joint attention: Communication and other minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
10. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hilsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Meyer, M. A. (2010). A view on didactics and instructional planning from the perspective of research on learner development and educational experience. Éducation & didactique, 4(2), 75-99.
12. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking Press.
13. Putnam, H. (2001). Enlightenment and pragmatism. Assen: koninklijke Van Gorcum.
14. Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1997). Social interactions and mathematics learning. In T. nunes & P. Bryant (eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics. An international perspective (pp. 265-283). London: Psychology Press.
15. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353-367.
16. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70-76.
17. Sensevy, G. (2011A). Overcoming fragmentation: towards a joint action theory in didactics. In B. Hudson & M. A. Meyer (eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 60-76). Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
18. Sensevy, G. (2011B). Le sens du savoir. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
19. Sensevy, G., Mercier, A., Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., Ligozat, F., & Perrot, G. (2005). An attempt to model the teacher's action in the mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1-3), 153-181.
20. Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laubé, S., & Griggs, P. (2008). Modelling, an epistemological approach: cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education, 92(3), 424-446.