The pedagogical-technological divide and the elephant in the room

International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-38

  Dron, Jon ^a  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870836249     PISSN: 15372456     EISSN: 19435932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AECT. (1972). The field of Educational Technology: A statement of definition. Audiovisual Instruction, 17, 36-43.
2. Anderson, D. G. (2011). Taking the “Distance” out of Distance Education: A Humorous Approach to Online Learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1).
3. Anderson, T. (2009, 7-10 June). The dance of technology and pedagogy in self-paced distance education. Paper presented at the M-2009 conference, Maastricht, Netherlands.
4. Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. New York, USA: Free Press.
5. Bedny, G., & Karwowski, W. (2003). A Systemic-Structural Activity Approach to the Design of Human-Computer Interaction Tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 235-260.
6. Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475-490.
7. Brand, S. (1997). How buildings learn. London: Phoenix Illustrated.
8. Chumley-Jones, H. S., Dobbie, A., & Alford, C. L. (2002). Web-based Learning: Sound Educational Method or Hype? A Review of the Evaluation Literature. Adcademic Medicine, 77(10), S86-S93.
9. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
10. Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J, 12(2), 113-124.
11. Dron, J. (2006). Any color you like, as long as it’s Blackboard®. Paper presented at the E-Learn 2006, Hawaii.
12. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2009). Lost in social space: Information retrieval issues in Web 1.5. Journal of Digital Information, 10(2).
13. Franklin, U. M. (1999). The Real World of Technology. Concord ON: House of Anansi Press.
14. Friesen, N. (2007). (Micro-) Didactics: a tale of two traditions. In T. Hug (Ed.), Didactics of Microlearning: Concepts, Discourses and Examples (pp. 83-97). Munster: Wax-mann Verlag.
15. Jones, S. (1999). Almost Like a Whale. London: Doubleday.
16. Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Kauffman, S. (2008). Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason and Religion. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.
18. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Law, J. (2003). Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-notes-on-ant.pdf
20. Madaus, G. F., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment: lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 80.
21. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The Song Remains the Same: Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48-54.
22. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A Systems View. Belmont: Wadsworth.
23. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24. Morgan, G., & Adams, J. (2009). Pedagogy First: Making Web-Technologies Work for Soft Skills Development in Leadership and Management Education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(2), 129-155.
25. Nation, D., & Evans, T. D. (2000). Changing University Teaching: Reflections on Creating Educational Technologies. London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
26. Norman, D. A., & Dunaeff, T. (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
27. Nye, D. E. (2006). Technology Matters: Questions to Live With. MIT Press.
28. Papert, S. (1987). A Critique of Technocentrism in Thinking about the School of the Future. Paper presented at the Children in an Information Age: Opportunities for Creativity, Innovation and New Activities, Sofia, Bulgaria.
29. Phipps, R., & Merisotis. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington D.C.: American Federation of Teachers & National Education Association.
30. Saba, F., & Shearer, R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59.
31. Siemens, G. (2008). Pedagogy first? Whatever. Retrieved from http://www.connectivism. ca/?p=110
32. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28.
33. Vandenberg, D. (2002). The Transcendental Phases of Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(3), 321-344.
34. Wilkinson, A., Forbes, A., Bloomfield, J., & Fincham Gee, C. (2004). An exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse education. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(4), 411-424.
35. Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.