An architecture for diversity-aware search for medical web content

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 549-556

  Denecke, Kerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Diversity; Information retrieval; Medical social media; Web search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION STUDY; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; METHODOLOGY; SEARCH ENGINE; UNITED STATES;

INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; SEARCH ENGINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84870804327     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME11-02-0022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Vanhecke T, Barnes M, Zimmerman J, Shoichet S. Pubmed vs. highwire press: a head-to-head comparison of two medical literature search engines. Comput Biol Med 2007; 37 (9): 1252-1258.
2. Daumke P, Markó K, Propat M, Schulz S, Klar R. Biomedical information retrieval across languages. Med Inform Internet Med 2007; 32 (2): 131-147.
3. Daumke P, et al. Subword-based semantic retrieval of clinical and bibliographic documents. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (2): 141-147.
4. Krallinger M, Valencia A. Text-mining and in-formation retrieval services for molecular biology. Genome Biol 2005; 6 (224): 1-8.
5. Vit Novacek TG, Handschuh S. Coraal towards deep exploitation of textual resources in life sciences. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2009: 5651/2009; pp 206-215.
6. Anagnostopoulos A, Broder AZ, Carmel D. Sampling search-engine results. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web: New York, USA; 2005. pp 245-256.
7. Hearst MA, Pedersen JO. Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR '96. New York, USA; 1996. pp 76-84.
8. Radlinski F, Dumais S. Improving personalized web search using result diversification. In: SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. New York, USA; 2006. pp 691-692.
9. Hwang CS, Lin SF. Hill climbing for diversity retrieval. In: Burgin M, Chowdhury MH, Ham CH, Ludwig SA, Su W, Yenduri S (eds.). CSIE (5), IEEE Computer Society; 2009. pp 154-158.
10. Agrawal R, Gollapudi S, Halverson A, and Ieong S. Diversifying search results. In: WSDM'09: Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York, USA: ACM; 2009. pp 5-14.
11. Gollapudi S, Sharma A. An axiomatic approach for result diversification. In: WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, USA; 2009. pp 381-390.
12. Minack E, Demartini G, Nejdl W. Current approaches to search result diversification. In: Proceedings of The First International Workshop on Living Web at the 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC). Westfields Conference Center, Washington DC., USA; Oct. 2009.
13. Darmoni SJ, Leroy JP, Baudic F, Douyere M, Piot J, Thrion B. CISMeF: a structured Health resource guide. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39 (1): 30-35.
14. Dakka W, Ipeirotis PG. Automatic extraction of useful facet hierarchies from text databases. In: Proc. of ICDE "08. Washington, DC, USA; 2008. pp 466-475.
15. Hearst MA. Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. Communications of the ACM 2006: 49 (4); 59-61.
16. Diederich J, Balke WT. Automatically created concept graphs using descriptive keywords in the medical domain. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (3): 241-250.
17. Hliaoutakis A, Varelas G, Petrakis EGM, Milios E. Medsearch: A retrieval system for medical information based on semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of ECDL; 2006. pp 512-515.
18. Denecke K. Diversity in medical social media data: Approaches, study and future challenges. International Journal of Computational Linguistics Research 2010; 1(1): 1-11.
19. McCray AT, Burgun A, Bodenreider O. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001; 84 (Pt 1): 216-220.
20. Luo G. Design and Evaluation of the iMed Intelligent Medical Search Engine. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE "09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA; 2009. pp 1379-1390.
21. Esuli A, Sebastiani F. SENTIWORDNET: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'06); 2006. pp 417-422.
22. Witten I, Frank E. Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd edition. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann; 2005.
23. Mueller H, Boyer C, Gaudinat A, Hersh W, Geissbuhler A. Analyzing web log files of the health on the net HONmedia search engine to define typical image search tasks for image retrieval evaluation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129 (Pt 2): 1319-1323.
24. Radlinski F, Craswell N. Comparing the Sensitivity of Information Retrieval Metrics. Proc. SIGIR 2010. pp 667-674.
25. Järvelin K, Kekäläinen J. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval; 2000. pp 41-48.
26. Jonquet C, Shah NH, Musen MA. The open biomedical annotator. Summit on Translat Bioinforma 2009. pp 56-60.
27. Aronson AR, Bodenreider O, Demner-Fushman D, Fug KW, Lee VK, Mork JG, Névéol A, Peters L, Roger WJ. From indexing the biomedical literature to coding clinical text: experience with MIT and machine learning approaches. ACL, Workshop BioNLP; 2007.