Text-mining and information-retrieval services for molecular biology

Genome Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2005, Pages

  Krallinger, Martin ^a   Valencia, Alfonso ^a  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AUTOMATION; BIOINFORMATICS; GENE FUNCTION; GENOME; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LINGUISTICS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; TEXT MINING;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DOCUMENTATION; GENES; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 22244459539     PISSN: 14656906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-7-224     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Altavista [http://www.altavista.com]
2. Google [http://www.google.com]
3. Schuler G, Epstein J, Ohkawa H, Kans J: Entrez: molecular biology database and retrieval system. Methods Enzymol 1996, 266:141-162.
4. Entrez PubMed [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed]
5. Wheeler D, Church D, Federhen S, Lash A, Madden T, Pontius J, Schuler G, Schriml L, Sequeira E, Tatusova T, Wagner L: Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:28-33.
6. Editorial: The ultimate search engine? Nature Cell Biology 2005, 7:1.
7. Google Scholar [http://scholar.google.com]
8. CrossRef Search, publisher pilot for full-text scholarly research [http://www.crossref.org/crossrefsearch.html]
9. Nature Publishing Group search engine http://search.nature.com/search/?sp_a=sp1001702d&sp_t= advanced&sp_x_I=ujournal&sp-p=all&sp
10. Staab S, Blaschke C, Nedellec C, Park J, Schatz B, Valencia A, Bernardi L, Ratsch E, Kania R, Saric J, Rojas I, Staab S: Mining information for functional genomics. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2002, 17:66-80.
11. Knecht L, Shooshan S: Internet Grateful Med to be retired; reminder of NLM Gateway availability. NLM Tech Bull 2001, 318:e3.
12. Biomail [http://biomaii.sourceforge.net/biomail]
13. Hokamp K, Wolfe K: PubCrawier. keeping up comfortably with PubMed and GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:WI6-WI9.
14. PubCrawler [http://pubcrawler.gen.tcd.ie/]
15. Shultz M, DeGroote S: MEDLINE SDI services: how do they compare? J Med Libr Assoc 2003, 91:460-467.
16. Expasy - SwissProt and TrEMBL [http://us.expasy.org/sprot]
17. Chen L, Liu H, Friedman C: Gene name ambiguity of eukaryotic nomenclatures. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:248-256.
18. Zeeberg B, Riss J, Kane D, Bussey K, Uchio E, Linehan W, Barrett J, Weinstein J: Mistaken identifiers: gene name errors can be introduced inadvertently when using Excel in bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:80.
19. Hirschman L, Yeh A, Blaschke C, Valencia A. Overview of BIoCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(Suppl I):S1.
20. Kim J, Ohta T, Tsuruoka Y, Tateisi Y: Introduction to the bio-entity recognition task at JNLPBA. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications 28-29 August 2004; Geneva. 70-76. [http://www.genisis.ch/-natlang/JNLPBA04/JNLPBA.final.pdf]
21. Yeh A, Morgan A, Colosimo M, Hirschman L: BioCreAtIvE task IA: gene mention finding evaluation. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(Suppl I):S2.
22. Krauthammer M, Rzhetsky A, Morozov P, Friedman C: Using BLAST for identifying gene and protein names in journal articles. Gene 2000, 259:245-252.
23. Chang J, Schutze H, Altman R: GAPSCORE: finding gene and protein names one word at a time. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20:216-225.
24. Gene and Protein Name Server [http://bionlp.stanford.edu/gapscore]
25. Mika S, Rost B: NLProt: extracting protein names and sequences from papers. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:W634-W637.
26. CUBIC: NLProt/Index [http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/services/nlprot]
27. Franzen K, Eriksson G, Olsson F, Asker L, Liden P, Coster J: Protein names and how to find them. Int J Med Inf 2002, 67:49-61.
28. Yapex [http://ellis.sics.se:8080/cgi-bin/Yapex/yapex.cgi]
29. Tanabe L, Wilbur W: Tagging gene and protein names in biomedical text. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:1124-1132.
30. AbGene [ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/tanabe]
31. Settles B: Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets. Proc NLPBA/COLING 2004. 2004.
32. ABNER: a biomedical named entity recognizer [http://www.cs.wisc.edu/-bsettles/abner]
33. Fukuda K, Tsunoda T, Tamura A, Takagi T: Toward information extraction: identifying protein names from biological papers. Pac Symp Biocomput 1998, 3:707-718.
34. KeX [http://www.hgc.jp/service/tooldoc/KeX]
35. Chang J, Schuetze H, Altman R: Creating an online dictionary of abbreviations from MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002, 9:612-620.
36. Biomedical Abbreviation Server [http://bionlp.stanford.edu/abbreviation]
37. Iragne F, Barre A, Goffard N, DeDaruvar A: AliasServer: a web server to handle multiple aliases used to refer to proteins. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2331-2332.
38. AliasServer [http://cbi.labri.fr/outils/alias/index.php]
39. Hoffmann R, Valencia A: Life cycles of successful genes. Trends Genet 2003, 19:79-81.
40. Hoffmann R, Valencia A: A gene network for navigating the literature. Nat Genet 2004, 36:664.
41. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Lewington C, Mudali S, Kerrien S, Orchard S, Vingron M, Roechert B, Roepstorff P, Valencia A, et al.: IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Database issue):D452-D455.
42. Information hyperlinked over proteins (iHOP) [http://www.pdg.cnb.uam.es/UniPub/iHOP]
43. Blaschke C, Valencia A: The frame-based module of the Suiseki information extraction system. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2002, 17:14-20.
44. Donaldson I, Martin J, deBruijn B, Wolting C, Lay V, Tuekam B, Zhang S, Baskin B, Bader G, Michalickova K, et al.: PreBIND and Textomy - mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:11.
45. BIND - The Biomolecular Interaction Network [http://bind.ca]
46. Koike A, Kobayashi Y, Takagi T: Kinase pathway database: an integrated protein-kinase and NLP-based protein-interaction resource. Genome Res 2003, 13:1231-1243.
47. Kinase Pathway database [http://kinasedb.ontology.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp]
48. Muller H, Kenny E, Sternberg P: Textpresso: an ontology-based information retrieval and extraction system for biological literature. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:e309.
49. Textpresso [http://www.textpresso.org]
50. Wormbase [http://www.wormbase.org]
51. GOAnnotator [http://xldb.fc.ul.pt/rebil/tools/goa]
52. Perez A, Perez-Iratxeta C, Bork P, Thode G, Andrade M: Gene annotation from scientific literature using mappings between keyword systems. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2084-2091.
53. KAT [http://www.bork.embl-heidelberg.de/kat]
54. An Introduction to the Gene Ontology [http://www.geneontology.org/GO.doc.shtml]
55. Hu Z, Mani I, Hermoso V, Liu H, Wu C: iProLINK: an integrated protein resource for literature mining. Comput Biol Chem 2004, 25:409-416.
56. iProLINK [http://pir.georgetown.edu/iprolink]
57. Che H, Sharp B: Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:147.
58. Chilibot [http://www.chilibot.net]
59. Leroy G, Chen H: Filling preposition-based templates to capture information from medical abstracts. Pac Symp Biocomput 2002, 7:350-361.
60. GeneScene [http://genescene.arizona.edu/index.html]
61. MacCallum R, Kelley L, Sternberg M: SAWTED: structure assignment with text description-enhanced detection of remote homologues with automated SWISS-PROT annotation comparisons. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:125-129.
62. SAWTED [http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~sawted]
63. Tu Q, Tang H, Ding D: MedBlast: searching articles related to a biological sequence. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:75-77.
64. MedBlast [http://medblast.sibsnet.org]
65. Al-Shahrour F, Diaz-Uriarte R, Dopazo J: FatiGO: a web tool for finding significant associations of Gene Ontology terms with groups of genes. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:578-580.
66. Raychaudhuri S, Altman R: A literature-based method for assessing the functional coherence of a gene group. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:396-401.
67. Oliveros J, Blaschke C, Herrero J, Dopazo J, Valencia A: Expression profiles and biological function. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 2000, 11:106-117.
68. DNA Array Analysis with Geisha [http://www.pdg.cnb.uam.es/blaschke/cgi-bin/geisha]
69. Tanabe L, Scherf U, Smith L, Lee J, Hunter L, Weinstein J: MedMiner: an Internet text-mining tool for biomedical information, with application to gene expression profiling. Biotechniques 1999, 27:1210-1217.
70. MedMiner [http://discover.nci.nih.gov/textmining/main.jsp]
71. GeneCards [http://bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il/cards]
72. Jenssen T, Laegreid A, Komorowski J, Hovig E: A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nat Genet 2001, 28:21-28.
73. PubGene [http://www.pubgene.org]
74. Becker K, Hosack D, Dennis G, Lempicki R, Bright T, Cheadle C, Engel J: PubMatrix: a tool for multiplex literature mining. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:61.
75. PubMatrix [http://pubmatrix.grc.nia.nih.gov/secure-bin/index.pl]
76. MicroGENIE [http://www.cs.vu.nl/microgenie]
77. Kim JD, Ohta T, Tateisi Y, Tsujii J: GENIA corpus - semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:i180-i182.
78. Yeh A, Hirschman L, Morgan A: Evaluation of text data mining for database curation: lessons learned from the KDD Challenge Cup. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:331-339.
79. Hersh W, Bhupatiraju R: TREC GENOMICS track overview. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference 18-21 November 2003, Gaithersburg. Edited by Voorhees EM, Buckland LP. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2003: 14-24.
80. TREC Genomics Trach [http://ir.ohsu.edu/genomics]
81. Corney D, Buxton BF, Langdon W, Jones D: BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20:3206-3213.
82. BioRAT [http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/biorat]
83. Blaschke C, Valencia A: The potential use of SUISEKI as a protein interaction discovery tool. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform. 2001, 12:123-134.
84. Smalheiser N, Swanson D: Using ARROWSMITH: a computer-assisted approach to formulating and assessing scientific hypotheses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1998, 57:149-153.
85. ARROWSMITH [http://kiwi.uchicago.edu/]
86. Hristovski D, Peterlin B: Literature-based disease candidate gene discovery. Proceedings of Medinfo 2004. Edited by Fieschi M. Bethesda: American Medical Informatics Association; 2004:1649.
87. BITOLA - Biomedical Discovery Support System [http://www.mf.uni-lj.si/bitola]
88. Wren J, Garner H: Heuristics for identification of acronym-definition patterns within text: towards an automated construction of comprehensive acronym-definition dictionaries. Methods Inf Med 2002, 41:426-434.
89. ARGH - Biomedical Acronym Resolver [http://invention.swmed.edu/argh]
90. Relationship Extractor http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~murthyr/Relationship_Extractor.html
91. Perez-Iratxeta C, Bork P, Andrade M: XplorMed: a tool for exploring MEDLINE abstracts. Trends Biochem Sci 2001, 26:573-575.
92. XplorMed [http://www.bork.embl-heidelberg.de/xplormed]
93. Scopus [http://www.scopus.com/scopus/home.url]