Exeter Short Stems Compared With Standard Length Exeter Stems: Experience From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Choy, Godwin G H ^a   Roe, John A ^a   Whitehouse, Sarah L ^a   Cashman, Kara S ^b   Crawford, Ross W ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Exeter; Registry; Short stem; Small stem; Stem survivorship

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXETER SHORT STEMS HIP IMPLANT; FEMUR; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REGISTER; STANDARD LENGTH EXETER STEMS HIP IMPLANT;

EID: 84870802154     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ling R.S., Charity J., Lee A.J., et al. The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):511.
2. Williams H.D., Browne G., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84:324.
3. Carrington N.C., Sierra R.J., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter Universal cemented femoral component at 15 to 17 years: an update on the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:730.
4. Fowler J.L., Gie G.A., Lee A.J., et al. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 1988, 19(3):477.
5. Ling R.S.M., Lee A.J.C., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter Hip-40 years of innovation in total hip arthroplasty 2010, 369. Exeter Hip Publishing, Exeter.
6. Fang C., Chiu K.Y., Tang W.M., et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty specifically designed for Asians: clinical and radiologic results at a mean of 10 years. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(6):873.
7. Bagaria V., Deshpande S., Kuthe A., et al. Radiographic study of the hip joint to determine anthropometric parameters for Indian population. Eur J Radiol 2012, 81(2):312.
8. Fang D., Chiu K.Y., Remedios I.D., et al. Osteometry of the Chinese proximal femur. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 1996, 4(2):41.
9. Chiu K.Y., Fang D. Endosteal shape of the proximal femur in Chinese. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 1997, 5(2):21.
10. Chiu K.H., Shen W.Y., Cheung K.W., et al. Primary Exeter total hip arthroplasty in patients with small femurs: a minimal of 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(3):275.
11. Tai C.C., Nam H.Y., Abbas A.A., et al. First series of Exeter small stem primary total hip arthroplasty minimum 5 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(8):1200.
12. Thien T.M., Karrholm J. Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(4):407.
13. Chiu K.H., Cheung K.W., Chung K.Y., et al. Exeter small femoral stem for patients with small femurs. J Orthop Surg 2011, 19(3):279.
14. Graves S.E., Davidson D., Ingerson L., et al. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Aust 2004, 180(5 Suppl):S31.
15. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide:AOA; 2011.
16. Soderman P., Malchau H., Herberts P., et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72(2):113.
17. Hoaglund F.T., Low W.D. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980, 152:10.
18. Chiu K.Y., Ng T.P., Tang W.M., et al. The shape and size of femoral components in revision total hip arthroplasty among Chinese patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2003, 11(1):53.
19. O'Neill G.K., Maheshwari R., Willis C., et al. Fracture of an Exeter 'cement in cement' revision stem: a case report. Hip Int 2011, 21(5):627.
20. Williams D.H., Howell J.R., Hubble M.J., et al. The short 35.5 mm offset Exeter cemented femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011, 93-B(Suppl.):45.
21. Rockborn P., Olsson S.S. Loosening and bone resorption in Exeter hip arthroplasties. Review at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993, 75(6):865.
22. Kalairajah Y., Molloy S., Patterson M. The effect of femoral stem size on failure rates in total hip replacement cemented with Boneloc. Acta Orthop Belg 2002, 68(1):33.
23. Wilson L.J., Roe J.A., Pearcy M.J., et al. Shortening cemented femoral implants an in vitro investigation to quantify Exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:934.
24. De Man F.H., Haverkamp D., Van der Vis H.M., et al. Small stem total hip arthroplasty in hypoplasia of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(6):1429.
25. Sanchez-Sotelo J., Berry D.J., Trousdale R.T., et al. Surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults: II. Arthroplasty options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002, 10(5):334.
26. Howie C.R., Ohly N.E., Miller B. Cemented total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric osteotomy in dysplastic hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(12):3240.