Re-excision rates and local recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

Volumn 72, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1018-1023

  Dieterich, M ^a   Dieterich, H ^b   Moch, H ^c   Rosso, C ^b,c  

^a ROSTOCK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Germany)

^b Women's Hospital and Breast Cancer Center   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

breast cancer; breast conserving therapy; local recurrence; margin status; oncoplastic surgery; re excision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; REOPERATION;

EID: 84870782482     PISSN: 00165751     EISSN: 14388804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327980     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Caughran J. L., Vicini F. A., Kestin L. L. et al. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol: 2009; 16 3020 3027
2. Tartter P. I., Kaplan J., Bleiweiss I. et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg: 2000; 179 81 85
3. Aziz D., Rawlinson E., Narod S. A. et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J: 2006; 12 331 337
4. Yiu C. C., Loo W. T., Lam C. K. et al. Presence of extensive intraductal component in patients undergoing breast conservative surgery predicts presence of residual disease in subsequent completion mastectomy. Chin Med J (Engl): 2009; 122 900 905
5. Holland R., Connolly J. L., Gelman R. et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast. J Clin Oncol: 1990; 8 113 118
6. Sanchez C., Brem R. F., McSwain A. P. et al. Factors associated with re-excision in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am Surg: 2010; 76 331 334
7. Mirza N. Q., Vlastos G., Meric F. et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol: 2002; 9 256 265
8. Smitt M. C., Nowels K. W., Zdeblick M. J. et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer: 1995; 76 259 267
9. AGO: AGO Breast Commission Diagnosis and treatment of patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Recommendations. 2009; http://www.ago-online.de
10. Morrow M., Strom E. A., Bassett L. W. et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin: 2002; 52 277 300
11. Menes T. S., Tartter P. I., Bleiweiss I. et al. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol: 2005; 12 881 885
12. OSullivan M. J., Li T., Freedman G. et al. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol: 2007; 14 3133 3140
13. Meric F., Mirza N. Q., Vlastos G. et al. Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer: 2003; 97 926 933
14. Clough K. B., Kaufman G. J., Nos C. et al. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol: 2010; 17 1375 1391
15. Singletary S. E., Allred C., Ashley P. et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol: 2002; 20 3628 3636
16. Miller A. R., Brandao G., Prihoda T. J. et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol: 2004; 86 134 140
17. Wazer D. E., Schmidt-Ullrich R. K., Ruthazer R. et al. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys: 1999; 45 885 891
18. Kurniawan E. D., Wong M. H., Windle I. et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol: 2008; 15 2542 2549
19. Smitt M. C., Horst K. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol: 2007; 14 1040 1044
20. Cabioglu N., Hunt K. K., Sahin A. A. et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol: 2007; 14 1458 1471
21. Dillon M. F., Hill A. D., Quinn C. M. et al. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol: 2006; 13 333 339
22. Chagpar A. B., Martin R. C. 2nd, Hagendoorn L. J. et al. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg: 2004; 188 399 402
23. Bani M. R., Lux M. P., Heusinger K. et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol: 2009; 35 32 37
24. Sakr R. A., Poulet B., Kaufman G. J. et al. Clear margins for invasive lobular carcinoma: A surgical challenge. Eur J Surg Oncol: 2011; 37 350 356
25. Pleijhuis R. G., Graafland M., de Vries J. et al. Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol: 2009; 16 2717 2730
26. McCahill L. E., Single R. M., Aiello Bowles E. J. et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA: 2012; 307 467 475
27. Meier-Meitinger M., Rauh C., Adamietz B. et al. Accuracy of radiological tumour size assessment and the risk for re-excision in a cohort of primary breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol: 2012; 38 44 51
28. Rauh C., Hack C., Häberle L. et al. Percent mammographic density and dense area as risk factors for breast cancer. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2012; 72 727 733
29. Kümmel S., Kolberg H. C., Lüftner D. et al. Breast cancer 2011 - new aspects. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 939 953
30. Swanson G. P., Rynearson K., Symmonds R. Significance of margins of excision on breast cancer recurrence. Am J Clin Oncol: 2002; 25 438 441
31. Coopey S., Smith B. L., Hanson S. et al. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol: 2011; 18 3797 3801
32. Allweis T. M., Kaufman Z., Lelcuk S. et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg: 2008; 196 483 489
33. Thill M., Roder K., Diedrich K. et al. Intraoperative assessment of surgical margins during breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ by use of radiofrequency spectroscopy. Breast: 2011; 20 579 580
34. Pappo I., Spector R., Schindel A. et al. Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res: 2009; 160 277 281
35. Schulz-Wendtland R., Dilbat G., Bani M. R. et al. Use of tomosynthesis in intraoperative digital specimen radiography - is a reduction of breast re-excision rates possible? Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 1080 1084
36. Böhm J., Zikán M. Einfluss der prognostischen Faktoren auf die Therapie des duktalen Carcinoma in situ der Brust. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 967 972
37. Fasching P. A., Ekici A. B., Adamietz B. R. et al. Breast cancer risk - genes, environment and clinics. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 1056 1066
38. Hartkopf A. D., Banys M., Krawczyk N. et al. Circulating tumor cells in early-stage breast cancer. Geburtsh Frauenheilk: 2011; 71 1067 1072