The Rise of Executive Federalism: Implications for the Picket Fence and IGM

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-25

  Thompson, Frank J ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

executive federalism; grant programs; intergovernmental management; picket fence federalism; waivers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870740311     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074012461561     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aberbach J. D.A republic divided. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007:157-193.
2. Abney G.,Lauth T. P.The politics of state and city administration. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1986:.
3. Abramowitz A. I.The disappearing center. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2010:.
4. Agranoff R.Managing within networks. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2007:.
5. Agranoff R.,McGuire M.Expanding intergovernmental management's hidden dimensions.American Review of Public Administration. 1999;29:352-369.
6. Agranoff R.,McGuire M.Another look at bargaining and negotiating in intergovernmental management.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2004;14:495-512.
7. Anderson E.Administering health care: Lessons from the health care financing administration's waiver policy-making.Journal of Law and Politics. 1994;10 (2): 215-262.
8. Arnold R. D.Congress and the bureaucracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1979:.
9. Beam D. R.,Conlan T. J.The tools of government. Salamon L.M., ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:340-380.
10. Beer S. H.Federalism, nationalism, and democracy in America.American Political Science Review. 1978;72 (1): 9-21.
11. Behn R. D.Leadership counts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1991:.
12. Beyle T.The state of the states. Van Horn C. E., ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2006:77-107.
13. Castellani P.From snake pits to cash cows. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2005:.
14. CavanaghS.KleinA. (2012, February9). Broad changes ahead as NCLB waivers roll out. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/02/09/21waivers.h31.html?tkn=WSYFETIPFMy.
15. Cho C.,Wright D. S.Perceptions of federal aid impacts on state agencies: Patterns, trends, and variations across the 20th century.Publius: Journal of Federalism. 2007;37 (1): 103-130.
16. Cooper P. J.By order of the president: The use and abuse of executive direct actions. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press; 2002:.
17. Coughlin T. A.,Zuckerman S.State responses to new flexibility in medicaid.Milbank Quarterly. 2008;86:209-240.
18. Dilger R. J.Federal grants-in-aid: An historical perspective. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2011:.
19. Duffin D. L.The influence of legislative oversight on discretionary authority.American Review of Public Administration. 1999;29:391-410.
20. Durant R. F.The administrative presidency revisited. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1992:.
21. Edwards B. C.,Garcia S. P.,Lashbrook A. E.,Flowers L.Let the sunshine in: Assuring public involvement in state medicaid policy making. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2007:.
22. Epstein D.,O'Halloran S.Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
23. Ferguson M. R.,Bowling C. J.Executive orders and administrative control [Special issue].Public Administration Review. 2008;68:S20-S28.
24. Gais T.,Fossett J.The executive branch. Aberbach J. D.Peterson M. A., ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:486-524.
25. Gamkhar S.,Hamid A.Political economy of grant allocations: The case of federal highway demonstration grants.Publius: Journal of Federalism. 2008;38 (1): 1-21.
26. Hale G. E.,Palley M. L.Federal grants to the states: Who governs?.Administration and Society. 1979;11 (1): 3-26.
27. Hays S. W.,Sowa J. E.A broader look at the "Accountability" movement: Some grim realities in state civil service systems.Review of Public Personnel Administration. 2006;26 (2): 102-117.
28. Helland E.The waiver pork barrel: Committee membership and the approval time of medicaid waivers.Contemporary Economic Policy. 1999;17:401-411.
29. Holahan J.,Pohl M. B.Federalism and health policy. Holahan J.Weil A.Wiener J. M., ed. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2003:179-214.
30. Howell W. G.Power without persuasion: The politics of direct presidential action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2003:.
31. Hu W.10 states are given waivers from education law.New York Times. 2012;:A13.
32. Huber J. D.,Shipan C. R.Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
33. Ingram H.Policy implementation through bargaining: The case of federal grants-in-aid.Public Policy. 1977;25:499-526.
34. Kincaid J.The state of U.S. federalism, 2000-2001: Continuity in crisis.Publius: Journal of Federalism. 2001;31 (3): 1-69.
35. Kincaid J.,Stenberg C. W."Big Questions" about intergovernmental relations and management: Who will address them?.Public Administration Review. 2011;71 (2): 196-202.
36. Kousser T.Term limits and the dismantling of state legislative professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005:.
37. Lowi T. J.The end of liberalism. New York: W.W. Norton; 1969:.
38. Lowi T. J.Two roads to serfdom: Liberalism, conservatism and administrative power.American University Law Review. 1987;36:295-322.
39. Luton L. S.Administrative "Interpretation" as policy-making: An abuse of discretion by presidential administrations.Administrative Theory & Praxis. 2009;31:556-576.
40. Macmahon A. W.Administering federalism in a democracy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1972:.
41. Mann T. E.,Ornstein N. J.The broken branch. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
42. Moe T. M.,Howell W. G.The presidential power of unilateral action.Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 1999;15 (1): 132-179.
43. Nathan R. P.The administrative presidency. New York: Macmillan; 1983:.
44. Nigro L. G.,Kellough E.Personnel reform in the states: A look at progress fifteen years after the winter commission [Supplement].Public Administration Review. 2008;68:S50-S57.
45. O'Toole L. J.,Meier K. J.Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2004;14:469-494.
46. Pear R.GAO says White House is expanding medicaid coverage.New York Times. 1995;:A22.
47. Perez-Pena R.Waivers for 8 More states from "No Child Left Behind.".New York Times. 2012;:A13.
48. Peterson P. E.The price of federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1995:.
49. Peterson P. E.,Rabe B. G.,Wong K. K.When federalism works. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1986:.
50. Posner P. L.Federal assistance: Grant system continues to be highly fragmented. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2003:.
51. Pressman J. L,Wildavsky A.Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1973:.
52. Sanford T.Storm over the states. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967:.
53. Shor B.,McCarty N.The ideological mapping of American legislatures.American Political Science Review. 2011;105:530-551.
54. Soss J.,Schram S.,Vartanian T.,O'Brien E.Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution.American Journal of Political Science. 2001;45:378-395.
55. Stenberg C. W.Intergovernmental management for the 21st century. Conlan T. J.Posner P. L., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2008:263-285.
56. Stewart W. H.Models, metaphors, and federal theory.Publius: Journal of Federalism. 1984;12 (2): 5-24.
57. Thompson F. J.State and local governance fifteen years later: Enduring and new challenges [Special issue].Public Administration Review. 2008;68:S8-S19.
58. Thompson F. J.,Burke C.Executive federalism and medicaid demonstration waivers: Implications for policy and democratic process.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2007;32:971-1004.
59. Thompson F. J.,Burke C.Federalism by waiver: Medicaid and the transformation of long-term care.Publius: Journal of Federalism. 2009;39 (1): 22-46.
60. Thurmaier K.,Wood C.Interlocal agreements as overlapping social networks: Picket-fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas city.Public Administration Review. 2002;62:585-598.
61. Federal grant profile 1995: A Report on ACIR's Federal Grant Fragmentation Index. Washington, DC: Author; 1995:.
62. Medicaid waivers: HHS approvals of pharmacy plus demonstrations continue to raise cost and oversight concerns. Washington, DC: Author; 2004:.
63. Medicaid program: Demonstration proposals pursuant to section 1115(a) of the Social Security Act; Policy and procedures.Federal Register. 1994;59:23 960.
64. U.S. House Budget Committee. (2012). The path to prosperity, fiscal year 2013 budget resolution. Retrieved from http://prosperity.budget.house.gov.
65. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2011). Fiscal year 2012, historical tables, budget of the U.S. government. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2012/assets/hist.pdf.
66. Walker D. B.The rebirth of federalism. New York: Chatham House; 2000:.
67. Waterman R.Presidential influence and the administrative state. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press; 1989:.
68. Weaver R. K.,Rockman B. A.Do institutions matter?. Weaver R. KRockman B. A., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1993:1-41.
69. Weinberg M. W.Managing the state. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1977:.
70. Learning from leaders: Welfare reform politics in five Midwestern states. Weissert C. S., ed. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press; 2000:.
71. Weissert C. S.Beyond marble cakes and picket fences: What U.S. federalism scholars can learn from comparative work.Journal of Politics. 2011;73:965-979.
72. Weissert C. S.,Weissert W. G.Intergovernmental management for the 21st century. Conlan T. J.Posner P. L., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2008:157-175.
73. Wright D. S.Understanding intergovernmental relations. Belmont, CA: Belmont; 1978:.
74. Wright D. S.Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: Historical reflections and conceptual comparisons.Public Administration Review. 1990;50 (2): 168-178.