Perceptions of federal aid impacts on state agencies: Patterns, trends, and variations across the 20th Century

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 103-130

  Cho, Chung Lae ^a   Wright, Deil S ^b  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45449109674     PISSN: 00485950     EISSN: 17477107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjl018     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR). 1977. Improving Federal Grants Management. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
2. _. 1978. Categorical Grants: Their Role and Design. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
3. _. 1980. The Condition of Contemporary Federalism: Conflicting Theories and Collapsing Constraints. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
4. _. 1984. Regulatory Federalism: Policy, Process, Impact, and Reform. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
5. _. 1993. Federal Regulation of State and Local Governments: The Mixed Record of the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2001. American federalism and the search for models of management. Public Administration Review 61 (6): 671-681.
7. _. 2004. Another look at bargaining and negotiating in intergovernmental management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (4): 495-512.
8. Anderson, William. 1960. Intergovernmental Relations in Review. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Ban, Carolyn. 1995. How do public managers manage? In Bureaucratic Constraints, Organization Culture, and the Potential for Reform. San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Bohte, John, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2000. The marble cake: Introducing federalism to the government growth equation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30 (3): 35-46.
11. Bowman, Ann O'M., and George A. Krause. 2003. Power shift: Measuring policy centralization in U.S. intergovernmental relations, 1947-1998. American Politics Research 31 (3): 301-325.
12. Bowling, Cynthia J. 2006. Web site on American State Administrators Project (ASAP). http://www.auburn.edu.outreach/cgs/CGSASAP.htm.
13. Bowling, Cynthia J., and Deil S. Wright. 1998a. Change and continuity in state administration: Administrative leadership across four decades. Public Administration Review 58 (5): 429-444.
14. _. 1998b. Public administration in the fifty states: A half-century revolution. State and Local Governmental Review 30 (1): 50-62.
15. Bowling, Cynthia J., Chung-Lae Cho, and Deil S. Wright. 2004. Establishing a continuum from minimizing to maximizing bureaucrats: State agency head preferences for governmental expansion, 1964-1998. Public Administration Review 64 (4): 489-499.
16. Bowling, Cynthia J., Christine A. Kelleher, Jennifer Jones, and Deil S. Wright. 2006. Cracked ceilings, firmer floors, and weakening walls: Trends and patterns in gender representation among executives in American state governments. Public Administration Review 66 (6): 831-843.
17. Brudney, Jeffrey L., and Deil S. Wright. 2002. Revisiting administrative reform in the American states: The status of reinventing government during the 1990s. Public Administration Review 62 (3): 353-361.
18. Cho, Chung-Lae, and Deil S. Wright. 2001. Managing carrots and sticks: Changes in state administrators' perceptions of cooperative and coercive federalism during the 1990s. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 31 (2): 57-80.
19. _. 2004. The devolution revolution in intergovernmental relations in the 1990s: Changes in cooperative and coercive relations as perceived by state administrators. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (1): 447-468.
20. Chubb, John E., and Paul C. Peterson., eds. 1985. The New Direction in American Politics. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
21. Cole, Richard L., and John Kincaid. 2006. Public opinion on U.S. federal and intergovernmental issues in 2006: Continuity and change. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36 (3): 443-460.
22. Cole, Richard L., Rodney Hissong, and Enid Arvidson. 1999. Devolution: Where's the revolution? Publius: The Journal of Federalism 29 (4): 99-112.
23. Cole, Richard L., Carl W. Stenberg, and Carol S. Weissert. 1996. Reversing directions: A ranking and comparison of key U.S. intergovernmental events, 1960-1980 and 1980-1995. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 26 (2): 25-40.
24. Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1955. A Report to the President for Transmittal to the Congress. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
25. Conlan, Timothy. 1991. And the beat goes on: Intergovernmental mandates and preemption in an era of deregulation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 21 (3): 43-57.
26. _. 1998. From New Federalism to Devolution: Twenty-five Years of Intergovernmental Reform. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
27. _. 2006. From cooperative to opportunistic federalism: Reflections on the half-century anniversary of the Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Public Administration Review 66 (5): 663-676.
28. Corwin, Edward S. 1950. The passing of dual federalism. Virginia Law Review 36 (February): 1-24.
29. Council of State Governments (CSG). 1949. Federal Grants-in-Aid: Report of the Committee on Federal Grants-in-Aid. Chicago, IL: Council of State Governments.
30. Derthick, Martha. 1970. The Influence of Federal Grants: Public Assistance in Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Downs, Anthony. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
32. Elazar, Daniel J. 1962. The American Partnership: Intergovernmental Co-operation in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. _. 1984. American Federalism: A View From the States, 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
34. _. 1990. Opening the third century of American federalism: Issues and prospects. The Annals 509 (May): 11-21.
35. Gormley, William T., Jr. 1989. Taming the Bureaucracy: Muscles, Prayers, and Other Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Gramlich, Edward M. 1997. Financing Federal Systems: Selected Essays of Edward M. Gramlich. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
37. Grodzins, Morton. 1966. The American System: A new view of Government in the United States, ed. Daniel J. Elazar. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
38. Haas, Peter J., and Deil S. Wright. 1987. The changing profile of state administrators. Journal of State Government 60 (8): 270-278.
39. Hebert, F. Ted, and Deil S. Wright. 1982. State administrators: How representative? How professional? Journal of State Government 55 (1): 22-28.
40. Hoover Commission (Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Goverment). 1949. A Report to the Congress: Overseas Administration, Federal-State Relations, Federal Research. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
41. Ingram, Helen. 1977. Policy implementation through bargaining: The case of federal grantsin-aid. Public Policy 25 (4): 499-527.
42. Jenks, Stephen S., and Deil S. Wright. 1993. An agency-level approach to changes in the administrative functions of American state governments. State and Local Government Review 25 (1): 78-86.
43. Key, V.O., Jr. 1937. The Administration of Federal Grants to States. Chicago, IL: Public Administration Service.
44. _. 1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York, NY: A.A. Knopf.
45. Kincaid, John. 1990. From cooperative to coercive federalism. The Annals 509 (May): 139-152.
46. _. 1993. From cooperation to coercion in American federalism: Housing, fragmentation, and preemption, 1780-1992. Journal of Law and Politics 9 (Winter): 333-433.
47. _. 1996. From dual to coercive federalism in American intergovernmental relations. In Globalization and Decentralization: Institutional Contexts, Policy Issues, and Intergovernmental Relations in Japan and the United States, eds. Jong S. Jun, and Deil S. Wright, 29-47. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
48. _. 1998. The devolution tortoise and the centralization hare. New England Economic Review (May/June): 13-40.
49. Kincaid, John, and Richard L. Cole. 2005. Public opinion on issues of U.S. federalism in 2005: End of the post-2001 pro-federal surge? Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35 (1): 169-186.
50. Macdonald, Austin F. 1928. Federal Aid: A Study of the American Subsidy System. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell.
51. Miles, Rufus. 1978. The origin and meaning of Miles' Law. Public Administration Review 38 (5): 399-403.
52. Nathan, Richard P. 1996. The devolution revolution: An overview. In Rockefeller Institute Bulletin 1996: The Devolution Revolution, 5-13. Albany, NY: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
53. Nathan, Richard P., Allen D. Manvel, and Susannah E. Calkins. 1975. Monitoring Revenue Sharing. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
54. Nathan, Richard P., and Charles F. Adams. 1977. Revenue Sharing: The Second Round. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
55. Nathan, Richard P., and Fred C. Doolittle. 1987. Reagan and the States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. National Municipal League. 1928. Report of the committee on federal aid to the states. National Municipal Review 17 (6): 619-659.
57. Niskanen, William A., Jr. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
58. Oates, Wallace A. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
59. _. 1997. 'Foreword.' In Financing Decentralized Expenditures: An International Comparison of Grants, ed. Ahmad Ehtisham. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
60. Posner, Paul L. 1997. Unfunded mandates reform act: 1996 and beyond. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 27 (2): 53-71.
61. _. 1998. The Politics of Unfunded Mandates: Wither Federalism? Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
62. _. 2003. Federal assistance: Grant system continues to be highly fragmented. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, and Intergovernmental Relations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives. General Accounting Office (GAO-03-718T).
63. Pressman, Jeffrey L. 1975. Federal Programs and City Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
64. Riccucci, Norma M. 2005. How Management Matters: Street-level Bureaucrats and Welfare Reform. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
65. Sanford, Terry. 1967. Storm Over the States. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
66. Schneider, Saundra K., and William G. Jacoby. 1996. Influences on bureaucratic policy initiatives in the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6 (4): 495-522.
67. Schneider, Saundra K., William G. Jacoby, and Jerrell D. Coggburn. 1997. The structure of bureaucratic decisions in the American states. Public Administration Review 57 (3): 240-249.
68. Shannon, John. 1987. The return to fend-for-yourself federalism: The Reagan mark. Intergovernmental Perspectives 15 (3): 34-37.
69. Stephens, G. Ross, and Nelson Wikstrom. 2007. American Intergovernmental Relations: A Fragmented Federal Polity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70. Sundquist, James L., and David W. Davis. 1969. Making Federalism Work: A Study of Program Coordination at the Community Level. Washington D.C.: The Brooking Institution.
71. Walker, David B. 2000. The Rebirth of Federalism: Slouching Toward Washington. New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.
72. Webb, Sidney. 1911. Grants-in-Aid: A Criticism and a Proposal. London: Longmans Green.
73. Weidner, Edward W. 1960. Intergovernmental Relations as Seen by Public Officials. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
74. White, Leonard D. 1929. The Prestige Value of Public Employment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75. _. 1932. Further Contributions to the Prestige Value of Public Employment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76. Wright, Deil S. 1965. The advisory commission on intergovernmental relations: Unique features and policy orientation. Public Administration Review 25 (3): 193-202.
77. _. 1968. Federal Grants-in-Aid: Perspectives and Alternatives. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
78. _. 1974. Intergovernmental relations: An analytic overview. The Annals 416 (6): 1-16.
79. _. 1988. Understanding Intergovernmental Relations, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
80. _. 1990. Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: Historical reflections and contemporary comparisons. Public Administration Review 50 (5): 168-178.
81. _. 1997. Understanding intergovernmental relations. In Classics of Public Administration, eds. Jay M. Shafritz, and Alfred C. Hyde, 578-594. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
82. Wright, Deil S., and Carl W. Stenberg. 2007. Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: The origins, emergence, and maturation of three concepts across two centuries of organizing power by area and by function. In Handbook of Public Administration, eds. Jack Rabin, W. Bartley Hildreth, and Gerald J. Miller 3rd ed. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
83. Wright, Deil S., and Chung-Lae Cho. 2000. State administration and intergovernmental interdependency: Do national impacts on state agencies contribute to organizational turbulence? In Handbook of State Government Administration, ed. John J. Gargan, 33-66. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
84. _. 2001. American State Administrators Project (ASAP) Overview: Major Features of the ASAP Surveys, 1964-1998. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Odum Institute for Research in Social Science. Unpublished. Available on request from the authors.
85. Yoo, Jae-Won, and Deil S. Wright. 1993. Public policy and intergovernmental relations: Measuring perceived change(s) in national influence-The effects of the federalism decade. Policy Studies Journal 21 (1): 687-699.
86. _. 1994. Public administration education and formal administrative position: Do they make a difference? A note on Pope's proposition and Miles' law in an intergovernmental context. Public Administration Review 54 (4): 357-363.
87. Zimmerman, Joseph F. 1991. Federal Preemption: The Silent Revolution. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.