Factors affecting ethanol fermentation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4742

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 47, Issue , 2014, Pages 395-401

  Lin, Yan ^a,b   Zhang, Wei ^a   Li, Chunjie ^a   Sakakibara, Kei ^b   Tanaka, Shuzo ^b   Kong, Hainan ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MEISEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Fermentation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Strain optimization; Thermotolerant ability; Yeast

Indexed keywords

BUTYRIC ACID; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; PH; SACCHARIFICATION; SUBSTRATES; YEAST;

ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; FERMENTATION PROCESS; GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION; MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GROWTH RATES; STRAIN OPTIMIZATION; SUBSTRATE CONCENTRATIONS; THERMOTOLERANT;

ETHANOL;

ACETIC ACID; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOFUEL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GROWTH RATE; SUGAR; TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE; YEAST; BREWING INDUSTRY; CARBON; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GLUCOSE; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; PH; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84870719870     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: 18732909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ueno R., Urano N., Kimura S. Effect of temperature and cell density on ethanol fermentation by a thermotolerant aquatic yeast strain isolated from a hot spring environment. Fish Sci 2002, 68:571-578.
2. Banat I.M., Nigam P., Singh D., Marchant P., McHale A.P. Ethanol production at elevated temperatures and alcohol concentrations. Part I: Yeasts in general. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1998, 14:809-821.
3. Lin Y., Tanaka S. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 69:627-642.
4. McMillan J.D., Newman M.M., Templeton D.W., Mohagheghi A. Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation of dilute-acid pretreated yellow poplar hardwood to ethanol using xylose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1999, 77/79:649-655.
5. Krishna S.H., Reddy T.J., Chowdary G.V. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes to ethanol using a thermotolerant yeast. Bioresour Technol 2001, 77:193-196.
6. Wu Z.W. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic materials into fuel ethanol: pretreatment and non-isothermal simultaneous saccharification and fermentation 1998, Auburn University, US, pp. 30-1. 1st ed.
7. Ballesteros M., Oliva J.M., Negro M.J., Manzanares P., Ballesteros I. Ethanol from lignocellulosic materials by a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process (SFS) with Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10875. Process Biochem 2004, 39:1843-1848.
8. Zacchi G., Axelsson A. Economic evaluation of preconcentration in product & of ethanol from dilute sugar solutions. Biotechnol Bioeng 1989, 34(2):223-233.
9. Cysewski G.R., Wilke C.R. Utilization of cellulosic materials through enzymatic hydrolysis. I. Fermentation of hydrolysate to ethanol and single cell protein. Biotechnol Bioeng 1976, 18:1297-1313.
10. Iraj N., Giti E., Lila A. Isolation of flocculating Saccharomyces cerevisiae and investigation of its performance in the fermentation of beet molasses to ethanol. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 23:481-486.
11. Oh K.K., Kim S.W., Jeong Y.S., Hong S.I. Bioconversion of cellulose into ethanol by nonisothermal simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000, 89:15-30.
12. Aldiguer A.S., Alfenore S., Cameleyer X., Goma G. Synergistic temperature and ethanol effect on Saccharomyces cerevisiae dynamic behaviour in ethanol bio-fuel production. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 2004, 26:217-222.
13. Kasemets K., Nisamedtinov I. Growth characteristics of Saccharomyces serevisiae S288C in changing environmental conditions: auxo-accelerostat study. Anton Leeuw 2007, 92:109-128.
14. Gikas P., Livingston A.G. Specific ATP and specific oxygen uptake rate in immobilized cell aggregates: experimental results and theoretical analysis using a structured model of immobilized cell growth. Biotechnol Bioeng 1997, 55:660-672.
15. Gunasekaran P., Raj K.C. Ethanol fermentation technology--Zymomonas mobilis. Curr Sci 1999, 77:56-68.
16. Holzberg I., Finn R.F., Steinkraus K.H. A kinetic study of the alcoholic fermentation of grape juice. Biotechnol Bioeng 1967, 413-423.
17. 2+-Permeable channel in the yeast vacuolar membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:7801-7805.
18. Brachmann C.B., Davies A., Cost G.J., Caputo E., Li J., Hieter P., et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 1998, 14:115-132.
19. Skory C.D. Lactic acid production by Saccharomyces serevisiae expressing a Rhizopus oryzae lactate dehydrogenase gene. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2003, 30:22-27.
20. Phisalaphong M., Srirattana N., Tanthapanichakoon W. Mathematical modeling to investigate temperature effect on kinetic parameters of ethanol fermentation. Biochem Eng J 2006, 28:36-43.
21. McMeckin T.A., Olley J., Ratkwsky D.A., Ross T. Predictive microbiology: towards the interface and beyond. Int J Food Microbiol 2002, 73:395-407.
22. Gao C., Fleet G.H. The effects of temperature and pH on the ethanol tolerance of the wine yeasts: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida stellata and Kloeckera apiculata. J Appl Bacteriol 1988, 65:405-410.
23. Torija M.J., Rozes N., Poblet M., Guillamon J.M., Mas A. Effects of fermentation temperature on the strain population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol 2003, 80:47-53.
24. Dickinson J.R., Schweizer M. The metabolism and molecular physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2004, CRC Press, Florida, pp. 13 and 66. 2nd ed.
25. Gaudy A.F., Gaudy E.T. Microbiology for environmental Scientists and Engineers 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 519-66.
26. Moat A.G. Microbial physiology 1979, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 123-89. 4th ed.
27. Teresa G.C., Carmen A.A. Contribution of wild yeasts to the formation of volatile compounds in inoculated wine fermentations. Eur Food Res Technol 2006, 222:15-25.
28. Wang C., Xing J., Chin C.K., Ho C.T., Martin C.E. Modification of fatty acids changes the flavor volatiles in tomato leaves. Phytochemistry 2001, 58:227-232.
29. Dyer J.M., Chapital D.C., Kuan J.W., Mullen R.T., Pepperman A.B. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The role of the CDP-choline pathway. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:3756-3763.