Implicit measures of the stereotype content associated with disability

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 732-740

  Rohmer, Odile ^a   Louvet, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PREJUDICE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; STEREOTYPING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870714644     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: 20448309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02087.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ball, P., Monaco, G., & Schmeling, J. (2005). Disability and diversity in Fortune 100 companies. Behavioral Science Law, 23, 97-121. doi:10.1002/bsl.629
2. Carlsson, R. & Björklund, F. (2010). Implicit stereotype content: Mixed stereotypes can be measured with the Implicit Association Test. Social Psychology, 41, 213-222. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z
3. Chan, F., McMahon, B. T., Cheing, G., Rosenthal, D. A., & Bezyak, J. (2005). Drivers of workplace discrimination against people with disabilities: The utility of attribution theory. Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 25, 77-88. doi:10.1177/0885728810378681
4. Colella, A., De Nisi, A. S., & Varma, A. (1998). The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 102-111. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.102
5. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
6. Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 267-285. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x
7. Dambrun, M., & Guimond, S. (2004). Implicit and explicit measures of prejudice and stereotyping: Do they assess the same underlying knowledge structure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 663-676. doi:10.1002/ejsp.223
8. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. doi:10.1177/01461672952111002
9. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62-68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
10. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
11. Eckes, T. (2006). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the Stereotype Content Model. Sex Roles, 47, 99-114. doi:10.1023/A:1021020920715
12. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115-141. doi:10.1080/0269993004200024
13. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measure in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
14. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
15. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
16. Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
17. Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Nunes, A. (2009). A question of compensation: The social life of fundamental dimensions of social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 828-842. doi:10.1037/a0013320
18. Louvet, E. (2007). Social judgment toward job applicants with disabilities: Perception of personal qualities and competences. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 297-303. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.52.3.297
19. Louvet, E., & Rohmer, O. (2010). Are workers with disability perceived as competent? Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 16, 47-62.
20. Louvet, E., Rohmer, O., & Dubois, N. (2009). Stereotyping persons with disability: Intergroup and self perception. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68, 153-159. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.68.3.153
21. Nosek, B.A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565-584. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.565
22. Peris, T. S., Teachman, B. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). Implicit and explicit stigma of mental illness. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196, 752-760. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181879dfd
23. Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2004). Familiarité et réactions affectives à l'égard des personnes handicapées physiques [Familiarity and affective reactions toward people with a physical disability]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 57, 165-170.
24. Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2009). Describing persons with disability: Salience of disability, gender and ethnicity. Rehabilitation Psychology, 54, 76-82. doi:10.1037/a0014445
25. Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2011). Le stéréotype des personnes handicapées en fonction de la nature de la déficience. Une application des modèles de la bidimensionnalité du jugement social [Stereotype content of disability subgroups: Testing predictions of the fundamental dimensions of social judgment]. L'Année Psychologique, 111, 69-85. doi:10.4074/S0003503311001035
26. Wade, M. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2006). The structure of female subgroups: An exploration of ambivalent stereotypes. Sex Roles, 54, 753-765. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9043-x
27. Wittenbrink, B. (2007). Measuring attitudes through priming. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 17-58). New York : Guilford Press.
28. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship to questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262
29. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815-827. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.815
30. Wittenbrink, B., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.) (2007). Implicit measures of attitudes New York : Guilford Press.