Computing, we have a problem⋯

ACM Inroads

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 34-40

  Camp, Tracy ^a  

^a Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Broadening participation; Diversity; People with disabilities; Underrepresented minorities; Women

Indexed keywords

BROADENING PARTICIPATION; DIVERSITY; PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES; UNDERREPRESENTED MINORITIES; WOMEN;

ABSTRACTING;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS;

EID: 84870697633     PISSN: 21532184     EISSN: 21532192     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2381083.2381097     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. J. Foley, Computing, We Have a Problem, Computing Research News, vol. 17, no. 3, May 2005.
2. National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics 2010, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., April 2011.
3. T. Camp, The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline, Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 103-110, Oct. 1997. (Pubitemid 127442919)
4. U. S. Census Bureau News, Nation's Population One-Third Minority, May 10th, 2006, URL: http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/ cb06-72.html, viewed on July 10th, 2012.
5. U. S. Census Bureau, State & Country Quick Facts, URL: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html, viewed on July 10th, 2012.
6. V. Taylor and R. Ladner, Broadening Participation: Data Trends on Minorities and People with Disabilities in Computing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 54, no. 12, December 2011.
7. D. Kaminski and C. Geisler, Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention in Science and Engineering by Gender, Science, vol. 335, no. 6070, pp. 864-866, February 2012.
8. R. Ladner and T. Vandegrift, Introduction to Special Issue (Part 1): Broadening Participation in Computing Education, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 11, no. 2, July 2011.
9. CIRP Freshman Survey, Higher Education Research Institute, URL: http://www.heri.ucla.edu/cirpoverview.php, viewed on August 7th, 2012.
10. E. Roberts, Eric Roberts on the Dangers of Escalating Enrollments, Computing Education Blog, URL: http://computinged.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/ guest-posteric-roberts-on-the-dangers-of-escalating-enrollments/, viewed on August 6th, 2012.
11. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Overview of the 2008-2018 Projections, URL: http://www.bls.gov/oco/oco2003.htm, viewed on March 7th, 2012.
12. T. Lacey and B. Wright, U. S. Bureau of Labor: Occupational Employment Projections to 2018, URL: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2009/11/art5full.pdf, viewed on August 7th, 2012.
13. C. Ashcraft and A. Breitzman, Who Invents IT? An Analysis of Women's Participation in Information Technology Patenting, National Center for Women & IT, 2007.
14. BMO Financial Group, The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity, Catalyst, 2004.
15. J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing, The MIT Press, 2001.
16. National Center for Women & Information Technology, Promising Practice: Interview Strategies that Identify Functionally Diverse Perspectives, URL: http://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/fles/resources/interviewstrategiesiden tifyfunctionallydiverseperspectives08.pdf, viewed on August 7th, 2011.
17. E. Lazowska, Pale and Male: 19th Century Design in a 21st Century World, invited editorial, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 11-12, 2002.
18. W. Wulf, Diversity in Engineering, The Bridge, vol. 28, no. 4, National Academy of Engineering, 1998, URL: http://www.nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/ CompetitiveMaterialsandSolutions/DiversityinEngineering.aspx, viewed on August 7th, 2012.
19. Sally Ride Science, Science Can Take Her Places! A Guide for Parents: Grades 4-7, UTL: https://www.sallyridescience.com/fles/srs-sharedImages/Parent- handbook-eng-2006.pdf, viewed on August 7th, 2012.
20. A. M. May and R. Watrel, Occupational Segregation of Women on the Great Plains, Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, April 2000.
21. B. F. Reskin and I. Padavit, Sex, Race, and Ethnic Inequality in United States Workplaces, J. S. Chafetz Ed., Handbook on the Sociology of Gender, pp. 343-374, Springer, 2003.
22. M. Abrahamson and L. Sigelman, Occupational Sex Segregation in Metropolitan Areas, American Sociological Review, vol. 52, pp. 588-97, 1987.
23. M. W. Segal, Gender and the Military, J. S. Chafetz Ed., Handbook on the Sociology of Gender, pp. 563-582, Springer, 2003.
24. B. F. Reskin and P. A. Roos, Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations, Temple University Press, 1990.
25. B. F. Reskin, Labor Market as Queues: A Structural Approach to Changing Occupational Sex Composition. In David B. Grusky (Ed.), Social Stratifcation, pp. 718-733, 1991.
26. B. F. Reskin, Sex Segregation in the Workplace, Annual Review of Sociology Annual, vol. 19, pp. 241-269, 1993.
27. A. Boulis and J. Jacobs, The Changing Face of Medicine: Women Doctors and the Evolution of Health Care in America (The Culture and Politics of Health Care Work), ILR Press, 2008.
28. National Center for Women & Information Technology, Programs-in-a-box, Computer Science-in-a-box: Unplug Your Curriculum, URL: http://www.ncwit.org/resources/computer-science-box-unplug-your-curriculum, viewed on August 7th, 2012.
29. J. Cuny, Transforming High School Computing: A call to action, ACM Inroads, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 32-36, June 2012.
30. Computer Science: Principles, URL: http://www.csprinciples.org/, viewed on August 7th, 2012.
31. C. Stephenson and J. Cuny, What's Going on with AP CS: The 10, 000 Teachers Project, URL: http://csta.acm.org/ProfessionalDevelopment/sub/ CSIT10Presentations/Stephenson-Cuny.pdf, viewed on June 8th, 2012.
32. O. Astrachan and A. Briggs, The CS Principles Project, ACM Inroads, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 38-42, June 2012.
33. L. Snyder, T. Barnes, D. Garcia, J. Paul, and B. Simon, The First Five Computer Science Principles Pilots: Summary and comparisons, ACM Inroads, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 54-71, June 2012.
34. R. Kick, Computer Science Principles at Newbury Park High School, ACM Inroads, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 75-77, June 2012.
35. J. McGrath Cohoon and W. Aspray, eds. Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006.
36. T. Jones and V. A. Clark, Diversity as a Determinant of Attitudes: A Possible Explanation of the Apparent Advantage of Single-sex Settings, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51-64, 1995.
37. H. Schaumburg, Fostering Girls' Computer Literacy Through Laptop Learning: Can Mobile Computers Help to Level out the Gender Difference? Proceedings of the National Educational Computing Conference, Chicago, 2001.
38. G. T. Crombie, T. Abarbanel, and A. Trinneer, All-female Classes in High School Computer Science: Positive Effects in Three Years of Data, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 385-409, 2002. (Pubitemid 36607705)
39. V. Clarke and J. Teague, Characterizations of Computing Careers: Students and Professionals Disagree, Computer Education, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 241-246, 1996. (Pubitemid 126359378)
40. A. A. Helwig, Gender-role stereotyping: Testing Theory with a Longitudinal Sample. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, vol. 42, no. 5-6, pp. 403-423, 1998. (Pubitemid 128365471)
41. L. Barker and W. Aspray, The State of Research on Girls and IT. Chapter 1 of Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. Edited by J. McGrath Cohoon and W. Aspray, 2006.
42. L. Carter, Why Students with an Apparent Aptitude for Computer Science Don't Choose to Major in Computer Science. Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Houston, TX, March 2006.
43. H. Dryburgh, Underrepresentation of Girls and Women in Computer Science: Classifcation of 1990s' Research, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 181-202, 2000. (Pubitemid 33208172)
44. Institute for Women in Trades, Technology, and Science, CalWomenTech Project Outcomes Report, URL: http://www.iwitts.org/images/media/ nsfcalwomentechsummary.pdf, viewed on June 7th, 2012.
45. D. Milgram, How to Recruit Women and Girls to the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Classroom, Technology and Engineering Teacher, pp. 4-11, November 2011.
46. A. G. Greenwald and L. Hamilton Krieger, Implicit Bias: Scientifc Foundations, California Law Review, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 945-967, July 2006.
47. B. Nosek, et al. National Differences in Gender-science Stereotypes Predict National Sex Differences in Science and Math Achievement, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 106, no. 26, June 2009.
48. W. Jones, Workshop on Faculty Recruitment for Diversity and Excellence, NSF ADVANCE Program, University of Michigan, 2011.