Modelling forest α-diversity and floristic composition - on the added value of LiDAR plus hyperspectral remote sensing

Remote Sensing

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2818-2845

  Leutner, Benjamin F ^a,b   Reineking, Björn ^a   Müller, Jörg ^c,d   Bachmann, Martin ^e   Beierkuhnlein, Carl ^a   Dech, Stefan ^b,e   Wegmann, Martin ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c BAVARIAN FOREST NATIONAL PARK   (Germany)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boruta feature selection; Full waveform LiDAR; Herb layer; HyMap; Minimum noise fraction transformation; NMDS; Shannon index; Shrub layer; Tree layer

Indexed keywords

HERB LAYER; HYMAP; MINIMUM NOISE FRACTION; NMDS; SHANNON INDEX; SHRUB LAYERS; TREE LAYER;

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION TREES; FORESTRY; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING;

ATMOSPHERICS;

BIODIVERSITY; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION THEORY; HERBS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NOISE; OPTICAL ACTIVITY; RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SHRUBS;

EID: 84870676562     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs4092818     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Duffy, J.E. Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 437-444.
2. Hector, A.; Bagchi, R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 2007, 448, 188-190.
3. Balvanera, P.; Pfisterer, A.B.; Buchmann, N.; He, J.S.; Nakashizuka, T.; Raffaelli, D.; Schmid, B. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 1146-1156.
4. Tilman, D.; Reich, P.B.; Knops, J.M.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 2006, 441, 629-632.
5. Sala, O.E.; Chapin, F.S.; Armesto, J.J.; Berlow, E.; Bloomfield, J.; Dirzo, R.; Huber-Sanwald, E.; Huenneke, L.F.; Jackson, R.B.; Kinzig, A.; et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287, 1770-1774.
6. Bellard, C.; Bertelsmeier, C.; Leadley, P.; Thuiller, W.; Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 365-377.
7. United Nations. Convention on Biological Diversity; United Nations: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992.
8. Butchart, S.H.M.;Walpole, M.; Collen, B.; van Strien, A.; Scharlemann, J.P.W.; Almond, R.E.A.; Baillie, J.E.M.; Bomhard, B.; Brown, C.; Bruno, J.; et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science 2010, 328, 1164-1168.
9. Müller, J.; Brandl, R. Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: The potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 897-905.
10. Turner, W.; Spector, S.; Gardiner, N.; Fladeland, M.; Sterling, E.; Steininger, M. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 306-314.
11. Asner, G.P.; Martin, R.E.; Ford, A.J.; Metcalfe, D.J.; Liddell, M.J. Leaf chemical and spectral diversity in Australian tropical forests. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 236-253.
12. Asner, G.P.; Martin, R.E. Airborne spectranomics: Mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7, 269-276.
13. Oldeland, J.; Dorigo, W.; Wesuls, D.; Jürgens, N. Mapping bush encroaching species by seasonal differences in hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1416-1438.
14. Andrew, M.E.; Wulder, M.A.; Coops, N.C.; Baillargeon, G. Beta-diversity gradients of butterflies along productivity axes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 352-364.
15. Hüttich, C.; Gessner, U.; Herold, M.; Strohbach, B.; Schmidt, M.; Keil, M.; Dech, S. On the suitability of MODIS time series metrics to map vegetation types in dry savanna ecosystems: A case study in the Kalahari of NE Namibia. Remote Sens. 2009, 1, 620-643.
16. Cord, A.; Rödder, D. Inclusion of habitat availability in species distribution models through multi-temporal remote-sensing data? Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 3285-3298.
17. Vierling, K.; Bässler, C.; Brandl, R.; Vierling, L.; Weiss, I.; Müller, J. Spinning a laser web: Predicting spider distributions using lidar. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21, 577-588.
18. Bengtsson, J.; Nilsson, S.G.; Franc, A.; Menozzi, P. Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2000, 132, 39-50.
19. Feilhauer, H.; Schmidtlein, S. On variable relations between vegetation patterns and canopy reflectance. Ecol. Inform. 2011, 6, 83-92.
20. Rocchini, D.; He, K.S.; Oldeland, J.; Wesuls, D.; Neteler, M. Spectral variation versus species beta-diversity at different spatial scales: A test in African highland savannas. J. Environ. Monit. 2010, 12, 825-831.
21. Oldeland, J.; Wesuls, D.; Rocchini, D.; Schmidt, M.; Jurgens, N. Does using species abundance data improve estimates of species diversity from remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity? Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10, 390-396.
22. Clark, M.L.; Roberts, D.A.; Clark, D.B. Hyperspectral discrimination of tropical rain forest tree species at leaf to crown scales. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 96, 375-398.
23. Carlson, K.M.; Asner, G.P.; Hughes, R.F.; Ostertag, R.; Martin, R.E. Hyperspectral remote sensing of canopy biodiversity in Hawaiian lowland rainforests. Ecosystems 2007, 10, 536-549.
24. Bunting, P.; Lucas, R.M.; Jones, K.; Bean, A.R. Characterisation and mapping of forest communities by clustering individual tree crowns. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 2536-2547.
25. Jones, T.G.; Coops, N.C.; Sharma, T. Assessing the utility of airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data for species distribution mapping in the coastal Pacific Northwest, Canada. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 2841-2852.
26. Nagendra, H.; Rocchini, D.; Ghate, R.; Sharma, B.; Pareeth, S. Assessing plant diversity in a dry tropical forest: Comparing the utility of Landsat and IKONOS satellite images. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 478-496.
27. Clark, M.L. Identification of Canopy Species in Tropical Forests Using Hyperspectral Data. In Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Vegetation; Thenkabail, P.S., Lyon, J.G., Huete, A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 423-445.
28. Gilliam, F.S. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. BioScience 2007, 57, 845-858.
29. Wang, K.; Franklin, S.E.; Guo, X.L.; Cattet, M. Remote sensing of ecology, biodiversity and conservation: A review from the perspective of remote sensing specialists. Sensors 2010, 10, 9647-9667.
30. Bergen, K.M.; Goetz, S.J.; Dubayah, R.O.; Henebry, G.M.; Hunsaker, C.T.; Imhoff, M.L.; Nelson, R.F.; Parker, G.G.; Radeloff, V.C. Remote sensing of vegetation 3-D structure for biodiversity and habitat: Review and implications for lidar and radar spaceborne missions. J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114, G00E06:1-G00E06:13.
31. Thomas, V. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing for Forest Management. In Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Vegetation; Thenkabail, P.S., Lyon, J.G., Huete, A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 469-485.
32. He, K.S.; Rocchini, D.; Neteler, M.; Nagendra, H. Benefits of hyperspectral remote sensing for tracking plant invasions. Divers. Distrib. 2011, 17, 381-392.
33. Andrew, M.E.; Ustin, S.L. Habitat suitability modelling of an invasive plant with advanced remote sensing data. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15, 627-640.
34. Plourde, L.C.; Ollinger, S.V.; Smith, M.L.; Martin, M.E. Estimating species abundance in a northern temperate forest using spectral mixture analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2007, 73, 829-840.
35. Schmidtlein, S.; Feilhauer, H.; Bruelheide, H. Mapping plant strategy types using remote sensing. J. Veg. Sci. 2012, 23, 395-405.
36. Rocchini, D.; Ricotta, C.; Chiarucci, A. Using satellite imagery to assess plant species richness: The role of multispectral systems. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2007, 10, 325-331.
37. Feilhauer, H.; Faude, U.; Schmidtlein, S. Combining Isomap ordination and imaging spectroscopy to map continuous floristic gradients in a heterogeneous landscape. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 2513-2524.
38. Wang, L.; Sousa, W.P.; Gong, P.; Biging, G.S. Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of Panama. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 91, 432 - 440.
39. Nagendra, H.; Rocchini, D. High resolution satellite imagery for tropical biodiversity studies: The devil is in the detail. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17, 3431-3442.
40. Schmidtlein, S. Imaging spectroscopy as a tool for mapping Ellenberg indicator values. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 42, 966-974.
41. Yue, Y.M.; Wang, K.L.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Z.C.; Jiao, Q.J.; Liu, B.; Chen, H.S. Exploring the relationship between vegetation spectra and eco-geo-environmental conditions in karst region, Southwest China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 160, 157-168.
42. B̈assler, C.; Stadler, J.; M̈uller, J.; F̈orster, B.; G̈ottlein, A.; Brandl, R. LiDAR as a rapid tool to predict forest habitat types in Natura 2000 networks. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20, 465-481.
43. M̈uller, J.; Stadler, J.; Brandl, R. Composition versus physiognomy of vegetation as predictors of bird assemblages: The role of lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 490-495.
44. M̈uller, J.; Moning, C.; B̈assler, C.; Heurich, M.; Brandl, R. Using airborne laser scanning to model potential abundance and assemblages of forest passerines. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2009, 10, 671-681.
45. Goetz, S.; Steinberg, D.; Dubayah, R.; Blair, B. Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 108, 254-263.
46. Dalponte, M.; Bruzzone, L.; Gianelle, D. Fusion of hyperspectral and LIDAR remote sensing data for classification of complex forest areas. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46, 1416-1427.
47. Féret, J.B.; Asner, G.P. Semi-supervised methods to identify individual crowns of lowland tropical canopy species using imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 2457-2476.
48. Stuffler, T.; Kaufmann, C.; Hofer, S.; F̈orster, K.P.; Schreier, G.; Mueller, A.; Eckardt, A.; Bach, H.; Penné, B.; Benz, U.; Haydn, R. The EnMAP hyperspectral imager-An advanced optical payload for future applications in Earth observation programmes. Acta Astronaut. 2007, 61, 115-120.
49. National Research Council of the National Academiesun. Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
50. USGS. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 3 Arc Second scenes N49E012 and N48E013, v2.1 ed.; Global Land Cover Facility, University of Maryland: College Park, MD, USA, 2006.
51. M̈uller, J.; Bußler, H.; Goßner, M.; Rettelbach, T.; Duelli, P. The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: From pest to keystone species. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17, 2979-3001.
52. Cocks, T.; Jenssen, R.; Stewart, A.; Wilson, I.; Shields, T. The HyMap Airborne Hyperspectral Sensor: The System, Calibration and Performance. In Proceedings of the 1st EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, Z̈urich, Switzerland, 6-8 October 1998.
53. Richter, R.; Schl̈apfer, D. Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imaging spectrometry data. Part 2: Atmospheric/topographic correction. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2002, 23, 2631-2649.
54. Green, A.A.; Berman, M.; Switzer, P.; Craig, M.D. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1988, 26, 65-74.
55. ITT Visual Information Solutions. ENVI 4.7; ITT Visual Information Solutions: Boulder, CO, USA.
56. Reitberger, J.; Krystek, P.; Heurich, M. Full-waveform Analysis of Small Footprint Airborne Laser Scanning Data in the Bavarian Forest National Park for Tree Species Classification. In Proceedings of the Workshop on 3D Remote Sensing in Forestry, Vienna, Austria, 14-15 February 2006; pp. 218-227.
57. Drake, J.B.; Dubayah, R.O.; Clark, D.B.; Knox, R.G.; Blair, J.; Hofton, M.A.; Chazdon, R.L.; Weishampel, J.F.; Prince, S. Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 79, 305-319.
58. B̈assler, C.; F̈orster, B.; Moning, C.; M̈uller, J. The BIOKLIM Project: Biodiversity research between climate change and wilding in a temperate montane forest-the conceptual framework. Waldoekologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz 2008, 7, 21-33.
59. Wyatt, J.L.; Silman, M.R. Centuries-old logging legacy on spatial and temporal patterns in understory herb communities. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260, 116-124.
60. Shepard, R. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. Psychometrika 1962, 27, 125-140.
61. Kruskal, J. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika 1964, 29, 115-129.
62. Foody, G.M.; Cutler, M.E.J. Mapping the species richness and composition of tropical forests from remotely sensed data with neural networks. Ecol. Model. 2006, 195, 37-42.
63. Feilhauer, H.; Asner, G.P.; Martin, R.E.; Schmidtlein, S. Brightness-normalized Partial Least Squares Regression for hyperspectral data. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2010, 111, 1947-1957.
64. Goetz, S.J.; Steinberg, D.; Betts, M.G.; Holmes, R.T.; Doran, P.J.; Dubayah, R.; Hofton, M. Lidar remote sensing variables predict breeding habitat of a Neotropical migrant bird. Ecology 2010, 91, 1569-1576.
65. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5-32.
66. Verikas, A.; Gelzinis, A.; Bacauskiene, M. Mining data with random forests: A survey and results of new tests. Pattern Recognit. 2011, 44, 330-349.
67. Kohavi, R. A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QC, Canada, 20-25 August 1995; pp. 1137-1145.
68. Ambroise, C.; McLachlan, G.J. Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 6562-6566.
69. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Second Edition, 2 ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009.
70. Kursa, M.B.; Jankowski, A.; Rudnicki, W.R. Boruta-A system for feature selection. Fund. Inform. 2010, 101, 271-286.
71. Cawley, G.C.; Talbot, N.L.C. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010, 11, 2079-2107.
72. Genuer, R.; Poggi, J.M.; Tuleau, C. Random Forests: Some Methodological Insights; Technical Report 6729; Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique: Paris, France, 2008.
73. Saeys, Y.; Inza, I.; Larrañaga, P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2507-2517.
74. Hua, J.; Xiong, Z.; Lowey, J.; Suh, E.; Dougherty, E.R. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules. Bioinformatics 2004, 21, 1509-1515.
75. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2012.
76. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O'Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Wagner, H. Vegan: Community Ecology Package; 2012. Available online: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 20 September 2012).
77. Liaw, A.; Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2002, 2, 18-22.
78. Kursa, M.B.; Rudnicki, W.R. Feature selection with the boruta package. J. Stat. Softw. 2010, 36, 1-13.
79. Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
80. Landolt, E.; et al. Flora Indicativa: Ecological Indicator Values and Biological Attributes of the Flora of Switzerland and the Alps, Editions des Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Gené;ve; WSL: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010; Volume 2, p. 376.
81. Rocchini, D.; Balkenhol, N.; Carter, G.A.; Foody, G.M.; Gillespie, T.W.; He, K.S.; Kark, S.; Levin, N.; Lucas, K.; Luoto, M.; et al. Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: Recent advances and open challenges. Ecol. Inform. 2010, 5, 318-329.
82. Vockenhuber, E.A.; Scherber, C.; Langenbruch, C.; Meissner, M.; Seidel, D.; Tscharntke, T. Tree diversity and environmental context predict herb species richness and cover in Germany's largest connected deciduous forest. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 13, 111-119.
83. Falkowski, M.J.; Evans, J.S.; Martinuzzi, S.; Gessler, P.E.; Hudak, A.T. Characterizing forest succession with lidar data: An evaluation for the Inland Northwest, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 946-956.
84. Lefsky, M.; Cohen, W.; Spies, T. An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 2001, 31, 78-87.
85. Schmidtlein, S.; Zimmermann, P.; Schüpferling, R.; Weiβ, C. Mapping the floristic continuum: Ordination space position estimated from imaging spectroscopy. J. Veg. Sci. 2007, 18, 131-140.
86. Mundt, J.T.; Streutker, D.R.; Glenn, N.F. Mapping sagebrush distribution using fusion of hyperspectral and lidar classifications. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2006, 72, 47-54.
87. Onojeghuo, A.O.; Blackburn, G.A. Optimising the use of hyperspectral and LiDAR data for mapping reedbed habitats. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 2025-2034.
88. Hassler, S.K.; Kreyling, J.; Beierkuhnlein, C.; Eisold, J.; Samimi, C.; Wagenseil, H.; Jentsch, A. Vegetation pattern divergence between dry and wet season in a semiarid savanna-Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant diversity in northwest Namibia. J. Arid Environ. 2010, 74, 1516-1524.
89. Tuomisto, H. A diversity of beta diversities: Straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 2010, 33, 2-22.
90. Jurasinski, G.; Retzer, V.; Beierkuhnlein, C. Inventory, differentiation, and proportional diversity: A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity. Oecologia 2009, 159, 15-26.
91. Jurasinski, G.; Jentsch, A.; Retzer, V.; Beierkuhnlein, C. Detecting spatial patterns in species composition with multiple plot similarity coefficients and singularity measures. Ecography 2012, 35, 73-88.
92. Baselga, A.; Jimenez-Valverde, A.; Niccolini, G. A multiple-site similarity measure independent of richness. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3, 642-645.
93. Steinbauer, M.; Dolos, K.; Reineking, B.; Beierkuhnlein, C. Current measures for distance decay in similarity of species composition are influenced by study extent and grain size. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, accepted.
94. Qian, H.; Ricklefs, R.E. Disentangling the effects of geographic distance and environmental dissimilarity on global patterns of species turnover. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 341-351.
95. Diaz-Uriarte, R.; Alvarez de Andres, S. Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinforma. 2006, 7, 3:1-3:13.
96. Strobl, C.; Boulesteix, A.L.; Kneib, T.; Augustin, T.; Zeileis, A. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinforma. 2008, 9, 307.
97. Harrel, F.E. Regression Modeling Strategies-with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; p. 570.
98. Dormann, C.F.; Elith, J.; Bacher, S.; Buchmann, C.; Carl, G.; Carré, G.; Marquéz, J.R.G.; Gruber, B.; Lafourcade, B.; Leitão, P.J.; et al. Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 2012, in press.
99. Dudoit, S.; Fridlyand, J.; Speed, T. Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2002, 97, 77-87.
100. Hofer, G.; Wagner, H.H.; Herzog, F.; Edwards, P.J. Effects of topographic variability on the scaling of plant species richness in gradient dominated landscapes. Ecography 2008, 31, 131-139.
101. Leutner, B.; Steinbauer, M.; Müller, C.; Früh, A.; Irl, S.; Jentsch, A.; Beierkuhnlein, C. Mosses like it rough-Growth form specific responses of mosses, herbaceous and woody plants to micro-relief heterogeneity. Diversity 2012, 4, 59-73.
102. Böhner, J.; Selige, T. Spatial prediction of soil attributes using terrain analysis and climate regionalisation. Gött. Geogr. Abh. 2006, 115, 13-27.
103. Xiao, Y.; Segal, M.R. Identification of yeast transcriptional regulation networks using multivariate random forests. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5, e1000414:1-e1000414:18.