The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems

BioScience

Volumn 57, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 845-858

  Gilliam, Frank S ^a  

^a MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Forest ecology; Herbaceous layer dynamics; Vegetation science

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148939523     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/B571007     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Anderson RC, Loucks OL, Swain AM. 1969. Herbaceous response to canopy cover, light intensity, and throughfall precipitation in coniferous forests. Ecology 50: 255-263.
2. Baker TT, Van Lear DH. 1998. Relations between density of rhododendron thickets and diversity of riparian forests. Forest Ecology and Management 109: 21-32.
3. Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Stapleton AE, Yanovsky MJ. 1996. Solar ultraviolet-B radiation affects seedling emergence, DNA integrity, plant morphology, growth rate, and attractiveness to herbivore insect in Datura ferox. Plant Physiology 112: 161-170.
4. Beatty SW. 2003. Habitat heterogeneity and maintenance of species in understory communities. Pages 177-197 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. 2 increase: A comparison of Salisbury (1927) with contemporary data. American Journal of Botany 84: 1572-1583.
6. Bellemare J, Motzkin G, Foster DR. 2002. Legacies of the agricultural past in the forested present: An assessment of historical land-use effects on rich mesic forests. Journal of Biogeography 29: 1401-1420.
7. Billings WD. 1938. The structure and development of old field short-leaf pine stands and certain associated physical properties of the soil. Ecological Monographs 8: 437-499.
8. Bohlen PJ, Scheu S, Hale CM, McLean MA, Migge S, Groffman PM, Parkinson D. 2004. Nonnative invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 427-435.
9. Brown MJ, Parker GG, Posner NE. 1994. A survey of ultraviolet- B radiation in forests. Journal of Ecology 82: 843-854.
10. Caldwell MM. 1971. Solar ultraviolet radiation and the growth and development of higher plants. Phytophysiology 6: 131-177.
11. Christensen NL, Gilliam FS. 2003. Temporal and spatial patterns of herbaceous layer communities on the North Carolina Piedmont. Pages 224-237 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay J-P, Dussault C, Waller DM. 2004. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 113-147.
13. Dambrine E, Dupouey J-L, Laut L, Humbert L, Thinon M, Beaufils T, Richard H. 2007. Present forest biodiversity patterns in France related to former Roman agriculture. Ecology 88: 1430-1439.
14. De Grandpré L, Bergeron Y, Nguyen T, Boudreault C, Grondin P. 2003. Composition and dynamics of the understory vegetation in the boreal forests of Canada. Pages 238-261 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Duffy DC, Meier AJ. 1992. Do Appalachian herbaceous understories ever recover from clearcutting? Conservation Biology 6: 196-201.
16. Ehrenfeld JG. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6: 503-523.
17. Ehrenfeld JG, Kourtev P, Huang W. 2001. Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecological Applications 11: 1287-1300.
18. Elliott KJ, Knoepp JD. 2005. The effects of three regeneration harvest methods on plant diversity and soil characteristics in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 211: 296-317.
19. Elliott KJ, Boring LR, Swank WT, Haines BL. 1997. Successional changes in plant species diversity and composition after clearcutting a Southern Appalachian watershed. Forest Ecology and Management 92: 67-85.
20. Flinn KM, Vellend M. 2005. Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 243-250.
21. Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A. 2003. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience 53: 77-88.
22. Fraterrigo JM, Turner MG, Pearson SM. 2006a. Previous land use alters plant allocation and growth in forest herbs. Journal of Ecology 94: 548-557.
23. _. 2006b. Interactions between past land use, life-history traits and understory spatial heterogeneity. Landscape Ecology 21: 777-790.
24. Fridley JD, Peet RK, Wentworth TR, White PS. 2005. Connecting fine- and broad-scale species-area relationships of southeastern U.S. flora. Ecology 86: 1172-1177.
25. Galloway JN, et al. 2004. Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70: 153-226.
26. George LO, Bazzaz FA. 2003. The herbaceous layer as a filter determining spatial pattern in forest tree regeneration. Pages 265-282 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Gilliam FS. 2006. Response of the herbaceous layer of forest ecosystems to excess nitrogen deposition. Journal of Ecology 94: 1176-1191.
28. Gilliam FS, Roberts MR. 2003a. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. _. 2003b. Introduction: Conceptual framework for studies of the herbaceous layer. Pages 3-11 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. _. 2003c. Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests: A mechanism for linkage. Pages 198-223 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Gilliam FS, Turrill NL, Adams MB. 1995. Herbaceous-layer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecological Applications 5: 947-955.
32. Gilliam FS, Platt WJ, Peet RK. 2006a. Natural disturbances and the physiognomy of pine savannas: A phenomenological model. Applied Vegetation Science 9: 83-96.
33. Gilliam FS, Hockenberry AW, Adams MB. 2006b. Effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on the herbaceous layer of a central Appalachian hardwood forest. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 133: 240-254.
34. Grant RH, Apostol K, Gao W. 2005. Biologically effective UV-B exposures of an oak-hickory forest understory during leaf-out. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 132: 28-43.
35. Hale CM, Frelich LE, Reich PB. 2006. Changes in cold-temperate hardwood forest understory plant communities in response to invasion by European earthworms. Ecology 87: 1637-1649.
36. Halpern CB, Spies TA. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913-934.
37. 2 and increased nitrogen deposition on photosynthesis and growth of understory plants in spruce model ecosystems. Oecologia 106: 172-180.
38. 2- enrichment differ among species and depend on understorey light availability. Global Change Biology 6: 213-226.
39. Horsley SB. 1993. Mechanisms of interference between hayscented fern and black cherry. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 2059-2069.
40. Hurd TM, Brach AR, Raynal DJ. 1998. Response of understory vegetation of Adirondack forests to nitrogen additions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 799-807.
41. Jolls CL. 2003. Populations of and threats to rare plants of the herb layer: More challenges and opportunities for conservation biologists. Pages 105-162 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ. 2005. Plot shape effects on plant species diversity measurements. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 249-256.
43. Levin DA, Wilson AC. 1976. Rates of evolution in seed plants: Net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 73: 2086-2090.
44. Luken JO. 2003. Invasions of forests of the eastern United States. Pages 283-301 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Lyon J, Sharpe WE. 2003. Impacts of hay-scented fern on nutrition of northern red oak seedlings. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26: 487-502.
46. Mäkipää R. 1998. Sensitivity of understorey vegetation to nitrogen and sulphur deposition in a spruce stand. Ecological Engineering 10: 87-95.
47. McCarthy BC. 2003. The herbaceous layer of eastern old-growth deciduous forests. Pages 163-176 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Meier AJ, Bratton SP, Duffy DC. 1995. Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecological Applications 5: 935-946.
49. 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 9086-9089.
50. Muller RN. 1978. The phenology, growth and ecosystem dynamics of Erythronium americanum in the northern hardwood forest. Ecological Monographs 48: 1-20.
51. _. 2003. Nutrient relations of the herbaceous layer in deciduous forest ecosystems. Pages 15-37 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Muller RN, Bormann FH. 1976. Role of Erythronium americanum Ker. in energy flow and nutrient dynamics of a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Science 193: 1126-1128.
53. Neufeld HS, Young DR. 2003. Ecophysiology of the herbaceous layer in temperate deciduous forests. Pages 38-90 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Oliver CD, Larson BC. 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. Update ed. New York: Wiley.
55. Ousting HJ. 1942. An ecological analysis of the plant communities of Piedmont, North Carolina. American Midland Naturalist 28: 1-126.
56. Peet RK, Wentworth TR, White PS. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63: 262-274.
57. Pittillo JD, Lee M. 1984. Reference Plant Collection of the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory. Asheville (NC): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. General Technical Report SE-29.
58. Platt WJ, Carr SM, Reilly M, Fahr J. 2006. Pine savanna overstorey influences on ground-cover biodiversity. Applied Vegetation Science 9: 37-50.
59. Qian H, Klinka K, Kayahara GJ. 1998. Longitudinal patterns of plant diversity in the North American boreal forest. Plant Ecology 138: 161-178.
60. Roberts MR. 2004. Response of the herbaceous layer to disturbance in North American forests. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1273-1283.
61. Roberts MR, Gilliam FS. 2003. Response of the herbaceous layer to disturbance in eastern forests. Pages 302-320 in Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Roberts MR, Zhu L. 2002. Early response of the herbaceous layer to harvesting in a mixed coniferous-deciduous forest in New Brunswick, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 155: 17-31.
63. Rooney TP, Waller DM. 2003. Direct and indirect effects of white-tailed deer in forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 181: 165-176.
64. Rousseaux MC, Scopel AL, Searles PS, Caldwell MM, Sala OE, Ballaré CL. 2001. Responses to solar ultraviolet-B radiation in a shrub-dominated natural ecosystem of Tierra del Fuego (southern Argentina). Global Change Biology 7: 467-478.
65. Sax D, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD. 2005. Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution, and Biogeography. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer.
66. 2. Nature 411: 466-469.
67. Searles PS, Flint SD, Caldwell MM. 2001. A meta-analysis of plant field studies simulating stratospheric ozone depletion. Oecologia 127: 1-10.
68. Shmida A. 1984. Whittaker's plant diversity sampling method. Israel Journal of Botany 33: 41-46.
69. Siccama TG, Bormann FH, Likens GE. 1970. The Hubbard Brook ecosystem study: Productivity, nutrients and phytosociology of the herbaceous layer. Ecological Monographs 40: 389-402.
70. Small CJ, McCarthy BC. 2002. Spatial and temporal variation in the response of understory vegetation to disturbance in a central Appalachian oak forest. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 129: 136-153.
71. _. 2005. Relationship of understory diversity to soil nitrogen, topographic variation, and stand age in an eastern oak forest, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 217: 229-243.
72. Solomon S. 1999. Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history. Review of Geophysics 37: 275-316.
73. Spyreas G, Matthews JW. 2006. Floristic conservation value, nested understory floras, and the development of second-growth forest. Ecological Applications 16: 1351-1366.
74. Strengbom J, Nordin A, Näsholm T, Ericson L. 2001. Slow recovery of boreal forest ecosystem following decreased nitrogen input. Functional Ecology 15: 451-457.
75. Struik GJ, Curtis JT. 1962. Herb distribution in an Acer saccharum forest. American Midland Naturalist 68: 285-296.
76. Taft JB. 2003. Fire effects on community structure, composition, and diversity in a dry sandstone barrens. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 130: 170-192.
77. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65-66.
78. Vellend M. 2004. Parallel effects of land-use history on species diversity and genetic diversity of forest herbs. Ecology 85: 3043-3055.
79. Vellend M, Verheyen K, Jacquemyn H, Kolb A, Van Calster H, Peterken G, Hermy M. 2006. Extinction debt of forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. Ecology 87: 542-548.
80. Verheyen K, Honnay O, Motzkin G, Hermy M, Foster DR. 2003. Response of forest plant species to land-use change: A life-history trait-based approach. Journal of Ecology 91: 563-577.
81. Vila B, Torre F, Martin J-L, Guibal F. 2003. Response of young Tsuga heterophylla to deer browsing: Developing tools to assess deer impact on forest dynamics. Trees 17: 547-553.
82. Welch NL, Belmont JM, Randolph JC. 2007. Summer ground layer biomass and nutrient contribution to aboveground litter in an Indiana temperate deciduous forest. American Midland Naturalist 157: 11-26.
83. Whigham DF. 2004. Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35: 583-621.
84. Zavitkovski J. 1976. Ground vegetation biomass, production, and efficiency of energy utilization in some northern Wisconsin forest ecosystems. Ecology 57: 694-706.