Modelling approaches in the early phases of information systems development

18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Luukkonen, Irmeli ^a   Korpela, Mikko ^a   Mykkänen, Juha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Analytical modelling; Information systems development; Socio technical approach; Systems analysis and design development

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS MODELLING; SOCIO-TECHNICAL APPROACH; SOCIOTECHNICAL; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN; TWO-DIMENSION;

ANALYTICAL MODELS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870652499     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Aguilar-Saven, R.S. (2004). Business process modelling: Review and framework, International Journal of Production Economics, Production Planning and Control, 90 (2), 129-149.
2. Alter, S. (2008) Defining Information Systems as Work Systems: Implications for the IS Field. In: European Journal of Information Systems 17, 448-469.
3. Arsanjani, A. (2002). Towards a Pattern Language for Web Services Architecture. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Pattern Languages on Programs, Monticello, Illinois.
4. Atkinson, C. (2000). Socio-Technical and Soft Approaches to Information Requirements Elicitation in the Post-Methodology Era. Requirements Engineering Journal, 5 (2), 67-73.
5. Bandara, W., Gable, G. G. and Rosemann, M. (2005). Factors and Measures of Business Process Modelling: Model Building Through a Multiple Case Study. European Journal of Information Systems, 14 (4), 347-360.
6. Bider, I. (2005). Choosing approach to business process modeling. Practical perspective. Journal of Conceptual Modeling, 34. http://www.inconcept. com/jcm/January2005/IBider.html.
7. Bødker, S. (1991). "Activity theory as a challenge to systems design", in H-E. Nissen et al. (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, pp. 551- 564 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
8. Checkland, P. (2000). Soft systems methodology in action: a 30-year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, Syst. Res. 17, S11-S58.
9. Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I. and Over, J. (1992). Process modelling. Commun. ACM 35 (9), 75-90.
10. Danesh, A. and Kock, N. (2005). An Experimental Study of Two Process Representation Approaches and their Impact on Perceived Modeling Quality and Redesign Success. Business Process Management Journal, 11(6), pp 724-735.
11. De Man, H. (2009). Case Management: A Review of Modelling Approaches, BPTrends, enero 2009, www.bptrends.com.
12. Dorn, J., Grun, C., Werthner, H. and Zapletal, M. (2007). A Survey of B2B Methodologies and Technologies: From Business Models towards Deployment Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).
13. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge (Engeström Y, Miettinen R, and Punamäki R. Eds.), pp 19-38, University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Giaglis, G.M. (2001). A taxonomy of business process modelling and information systems modelling techniques. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 13 (2), 209-28.
15. Hedegaard, M., Chaiklin, S. and Jensen, U.J. (1999). Activity Theory and Social Practice: An Introduction. In Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches (Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M. and Jensen, U.J. Eds), pp. 12-30, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.
16. Heeks, R. (2006). Health information systems: Failure, success and improvisation. In International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75 (2), 125-137.
17. Henkel, M., Zdravkovic, J., and Johannesson, P. (2004). Service-based processes: design for business and technology. In Proceedings of the 2nd international Conference on Service Oriented Computing, pp. 21-29, ICSOC '04. ACM, New York, NY.
18. Hommes, B.-J. and van Reijswoud, V. (2000). Assessing the quality of business process modelling techniques - introduction of the Q-ME framework. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS 33).
19. Iden, J., Opdahl, A.L., Eikebrokk, T.R. and Olsen, D.H. (2007). What Makes Process Modelling Effective - Modelling or Project Factors? In Lecture Notes in Informatics, European Conference on eHealth (Hein, A., Thoben, W., Appelrath, H.-J. and Jensch, P. Eds), pp. 78-92.
20. Korpela, M., de la Harpe, R. and Luukkonen, I. (2008). Depicting the landscape around information flows: Methodological propositions. In Proceedings of the SIG GlobDev Workshop, Association for Information Systems, Paris, France.
21. Korpela, M., Mursu, A., Soriyan, A., Eerola, A., Häkkinen, H. and Toivanen, M. (2004), I.S. research and development by activity analysis and development - dead horse or the next wave? In Information systems research - relevant theory and informed practice, (Kaplan, B., Truex, III D., Wastell, D., Wood-Harper, A.T. and DeGross, J.I. Eds.), pp. 453-471, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G. and Jørgensen, H. (2006). Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. In European Journal of Information Systems 15, 91-102.
23. Kuutti, K.(1991). Activity Theory and its applications to information systems research and development. In H-E. Nissen et al. (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, pp. 529-549, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
24. Lindsay, A., Downs, D. and Lunn, K. (2003). Business processes-attempts to find a definition. In Information and Software Technology, Special Issue on Modelling Organisational Processes, 45 (15), 1015-1019.
25. Lunn, K., Sixsmith, A., Lindsay, A. and Vaarama, M. (2003). Traceability in requirements through process modelling, applied to social care applications. Information and Software Technology, Special Issue on Modelling Organisational Processes, 45(15), 1045-1052.
26. Luukkonen, I., Toivanen, M. and Mursu, A. (2007). Toward planned changes: an activity-driven ISD model. In Proceedings of the 30th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia IRIS 2007, Models, Methods, and new Messages, Tampere, Finland.
27. Melão, N. and Pidd, M. (2000). A conceptual framework for understanding business processes and business process modelling. Information Systems Journal, 10 (2), 105-129.
28. Mentzas, G., Halaris, C. and Kavadias, S. (2001). Modelling business processes with workflow systems: an evaluation of alternative approaches. International Journal of Information Management, 21 (2), 123-135.
29. Minkkinen, I. and Eerola, A. (2007). Improving requirements engineering from the client?s perspective in the health care domain. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering as part of the 25th IASTED International Multi-Conference on Applied Informatics (Hasselbring W, Ed.), Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 93-98, Anaheim: Acta Press.
30. Mumford E. (2000). A socio-technical approach to systems design. Req Eng 2000, 5(2), 126-34.
31. Mursu, A., Luukkonen, I., Toivanen, M. and Korpela, M. (2007). Activity theory in information systems research and practice: theoretical underpinnings for an information systems development model. Information Research 12 (3) paper 311.
32. Mykkänen, J., Minkkinen, I., Pöyhölä, A. and Riekkinen, A. (2006). Improving Traceability of Functional Requirements to Information Needs and Applications in Healthcare. Abstract. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on eHealth and Telemedicine - NCeHT2006, (Doupi P, Ed.), p. 183-186. Valopaino Oy, Helsinki.
33. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction. pp 17-44. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Nurcan, S., Etien, A., Kaabi, R., Zoukar, I. and Rolland, C. (2005). A strategy driven business process modelling approach. Business Process Management Journal 11 (6), 628-649, Emerald Gropup Publishing Limited.
35. Rad, A.A., Benyoucef, M. and Kuziemsky, C.E. (2007). An Evaluation Framework for Business Process Modeling. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 4 (2), 1-19.
36. Recker, J. (2007). Understanding Quality in Process Modelling: Towards a Holistic Perspective. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 14 (2), 43-63.
37. Sedera, W., Gable, G., Rosemann, M., and Smyth, R.(2004). A success model for Business process modelling: Findings from A multiple case study. In Proceedings from Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 2004, pp. 485-498, Shanghai, China.
38. Sommerville, I. (2001). Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley.
39. Tremblay, G. (2004). Software Design. In Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (Abran A, Moore JW, Eds), IEEE Computer Society, p. 31 - 312.
40. Tuomainen, M., Mykkänen, J., Luostarinen, H., Pöyhölä , A. and Paakkanen, E. (2007). Model- centric approaches for the development of health information systems. In Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics (Kuhn KA, Warren JR, Leong T-Y, Eds). Building Sustainable Health Systems, Brisbane, p. 28-32, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2007. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 129.