Defining information systems as work systems: Implications for the IS field

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 448-469

  Alter, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

Definition of information system; Information system; IS discipline; IT antifact; Work system

Indexed keywords

EID: 56749130444     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2008.37     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. ACKOFF RL (1993) Presentation at the Systems Thinking in Action Conference, Cambridge, MA, cited by Silver M, MARKUS ML and BEATH CM (1995). The information technology interaction model: a foundation for the MBA core course. MIS Quarterly 3 (19), 361-390.
2. AGARWAL R and LUCAS Jr HC (2005) The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quarterly 29 (3), 381-398.
3. ALTER S (1999a) A general, but useful theory of information systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 1(13), [WWW document] http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/default.asp?vol = 1 &art = 13.
4. ALTER S (1999b) Information Systems: A Management Perspective 3rd edn, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
5. ALTER S (2003a) 18 reasons why IT-reliant work systems should replace 'The IT Artifact' as the core subject matter of the IS field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12(23), 365-394 [WWW document] http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/default.asp?vol = 12 &art = 23.
6. ALTER S (2003b) Sidestepping the IT Artifact, scrapping the IS Silo, and laying claim to 'Systems in Organizations'. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12(30), 494-526 [WWW document] http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/default.asp?vol = 12&art = 30.
7. ALTER S (2004) Desperately seeking systems thinking in the IS discipline. Proceedings of ICIS-25, the International Conference on Information Systems, pp 757-769, Washington, DC.
8. ALTER S (2005) Architecture of Sysperanto - a model-based ontology of the IS field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 15(1), 1-40 [WWW document] http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/ default.asp?vol = 15 &art = 1.
9. ALTER S (2006) The Work System Method; Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results, Work System Press, Larkspur, CA.
10. ALTER S (2007a) Service responsibility tables: a new tool for analyzing and designing systems. AMCIS 2007 - Americas Conference on Information Systems, Keystone, CO.
11. ALTER S (2007b) Pitfalls in analyzing systems in organizations. Journal of Information System Education 17(3), 295-302.
12. ALTER S (2007c) Customer-centric systems: a multi-dimensional view. Proceedings of WeB 2007, Sixth Workshop on eBusiness, pp 130-141, Montreal, Canada.
13. ALTER S (2008) Service system fundamentals. IBM Systems Journal 47(1), 71-85 [WWW document] http://www.research.ibm.com/ journal/sj/471/alter.html.
14. ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2008) Theories in IS research. Web site viewed on 2 February 2008 at [WWW document] http://www.istheory.yorku.ca/.
15. AVISON DE and MYERS MD (1995) Information systems and anthropology: an anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture. Information Technology & People 8(3), 43-46.
16. BENBASAT I and ZMUD RW (2003) The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 183-194.
17. BITNER MJ and BROWN SW (2006) The evolution and discovery of services science in business schools. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 73-79.
18. BOSTROM RP and HEINEN JS (1977a) MIS problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly 1(3), 17-32.
19. BOSTROM RP and HEINEN JS (1977b) MIS problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective. Part II: The application of socio-technical theory. MIS Quarterly 1(4), 11-28.
20. BRYNJOLFSSON E (2003) The IT productivity gap. Optimize 21 [WWW document] http://ebusiness.mit.edu/erik/Optimize/pr-roi.html.
21. BUCKINGHAM RA, HIRSCHHEIM RA, LAND FF and TULLY CJ Eds (1987) Information Systems Education: Recommendations and Implementation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK pp 204-214.
22. CARR N (2003) IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review 81(5), 41-49.
23. CARVALHO JA (2000) Information system? Which one do you mean? In Information Systems Concepts: An Integrated Discipline Emerging Proceedings of the ISCO 4 Conference (FALKENBERG E, LYYTINEN K and Verrijn-STUART, Eds), pp 259-280, Leiden, Holland, 20-22 September 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Viewed on 1 February 2008 at [WWW document] http://piano.dsi.uminho.pt/∼jac/SI/zdocumentos/IS1234.pdf.
24. CHECKLAND P (1999) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (Includes a 30-year retrospective), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
25. CHECKLAND P and HOLWELL S (1998) Information, Systems, and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
26. CHESBROUCH H and SPOHRER J (2006) A research manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 35-40.
27. DAVIS GB (2000) Information systems conceptual foundations: looking backward and forward. In Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology (BASKERVILLE R, STAGE J and DEGROSS JI, Eds), pp 61-82, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
28. DAVIS LE and TAYLOR JC Eds (1979) Design of jobs 2nd edn, Goodyear Publishing Company, Santa Monica, CA.
29. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60-95.
30. DELONE WH and MC LEAN ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9-30.
31. DENNIS AB, WIXOM H and TEGARDEN D (2002) Systems Analysis & Design: An Object Oriented Approach with UML. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
32. DOBING B and PARSONS J (2006) How the UML is used. Communications of the ACM 49(5), 109-113.
33. ERICKSON J and SIAU K (2004) Theoretical and practical complexity of UML. Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp 1669-1674, New York, NY.
34. FALKENBERG ED, HESSE W, LINDCREEN P, NILSSON BE, OEI JLH, ROLLAND C, STAMPER RK, VAN ASSCHE FJM, VERRIGN-STUART AA and VOSS K (1998) A framework of information system concepts: the FRISCO report. IFIP, ISBN 3-901882-01-4, viewed on 2 September 2008 at [WWWdocument] http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/∼hesse/papers/fri-full.pdf.
35. FICHMAN RG and KEMERER CF (1999) The illusory diffusion of innovation: an examination of assimilation gaps. Information Systems Research 10(3), 255-275.
36. GRAY P (2006) Manager's Guide to Making Decisions about Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Boston, MA.
37. HILL C, YATES R, JONES C and KOGAN SL (2006) Beyond predictable workflows: enhancing productivity in artful business processes. IBM Systems Journal 45(4), 663-682.
38. HIRSCHHEIM R and KLEIN HK (1994) Realizing emancipatory principles for information systems development: the case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly 18(1), 83-109.
39. HIRSCHHEIM R and KLEIN HK (2003) Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4(5), 237-293.
40. HOFFER JA, GEORGE JF and VALACICH JS (2002) Modern Systems Analysis & Design. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
41. HORN P (2005) The new discipline of services science. BusinessWeek, viewed on 1 September 2008 at [WWW document] http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2005/tc20050121-8020.htm.
42. HUBER MW, PIERCY CA and MCKEOWN PG (2007) Information Systems: Creating Business Value. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
43. JäRVELIN K and WILSON TD (2003) On conceptual models for information seeking and retrieval research. Information Research 9(1), Paper 163 viewed on 1 September 2008 at [ http://lnformationR.net/ir/9-1/paper163.html ].
44. JASPERSON J, CARTER PE and ZMUD RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 525-557.
45. JESSUP L and VALACICH J (2008) Information Systems Today: Managing in the Digital World 3rd edn, Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
46. JOHNSON J, BOUCHER KD, CONNORS K and ROBINSON J (2001) Collaborating on project success. Sponsored Supplement Software Magazine, viewed on 2 February 2008 at [WWW document] http://www.softwaremag.com/archive/2001feb/CollaborativeMgt.html.
47. KENDALL KE and KENDALL JE (2002) Systems Analysis and Design 5th edn, Prentice Hal, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
48. KROENKE DM (2008) Experiencing MIS. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
49. LAND F (1985) Is an information theory enough? The Computer Journal 28(3), 211-215.
50. LAND F (2000) Evaluation in a socio-technical context. Proceedings of IFIP W.G.8.2 Working Conference 2000, IS2000: The Social and Organizational Perspective on Research and Practice in Information Systems, Aalberg, Denmark.
51. LAUDON KC and LAUDON JP (2007) Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm 10th edn. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
52. LUFTMAN J (2005) Key issues for IT executives for 2004. MIS Quarterly Executive 4(2), 269-285.
53. LUFTMAN J, KEMPAIAH R and NASH E (2006) Key issues for IT executives 2005. MIS Quarterly Executive 5(2), 27-45.
54. LUFTMAN J and MCLEAN ER (2004) Key issues for IT executives. MIS Quarterly Executive 3(2), 89-104.
55. LYYTINEN K and NEWMAN M (2006) Punctuated equilibrium, process models and information system development and change: towards a socio-technical process analysis. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems, and Organizations 6(1), 1-48 viewed on 1 September 2008 at [WWW document] http://sprouts.case.edu/2006/060101.pdf.
56. MACALHAES R (1999) Organizational implementation of information systems: towards a new theory. Ph.D. Thesis, London School of Economics. [WWW document] http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/pdf/theses/ magalhaes.pdf.
57. MAGLIO PP, SRINIVASAN S, KRUELEN JT and SPOHRER J (2006) Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 81-85.
58. MARKUS ML and MAO JY (2004) Participation in development and implementation - updating an old, tired concept for today's IS contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(11:14), 514-544.
59. MATHIASSEN LA, MUNK-MADSEN PA, NIELSEN PA and STAGE J (2000) Object Oriented Analysis & Design. Marko Publishing, Aalborg, Denmark.
60. MCLEOD Jr R and SCHELL CP (2007) Management Information Systems 10th edn. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
61. MITCHELL VL and ZMUD RW (1999) The effects of coupling IT and work process strategy in redesign projects. Organization Science 4(10), 424-438.
62. MUMFORD E and WEIR M (1979) Computer systems in Work Design - the ETHICS method. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
63. O'BRIEN JA (2003) Introduction to Information Systems: Essentials for the e-Business Enterprise 11th edn. McGraw Hill - Irwin, Boston, MA.
64. ORLIKOWSKI WJ (1993) CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly 17(3), 309-340.
65. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and IACONO CS (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research - a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research 12(2), June 2001, 121-134.
66. PARASURAMAN A, BERRY LL and ZAEITHAML VA (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49(4), 41-50.
67. PAUL RJ (2007) Challenges to information systems: time to change. European Journal of Information Systems 16(3), 193-195.
68. PAWLAK Z (2002) Rough sets, decision algorithms, and Bayes' theorem. European Journal of Operational Research 136, 181-189.
69. PETKOV D and PETKOVA O (2006) The work system model as a tool for understanding the problem in an introductory IS project. Proceedings of the 23rd Information Systems Education Conference (ISECON 2006), Dallas, TX.
70. PETRIE DE (2004) Understanding the impact of technological discontinuities on information systems management: the case of business-to-business electronic commerce. Ph.D. Thesis, Claremont Graduate University.
71. RAI A and SAMBAMURTHY V (2006) Editorial notes - the growth of interest in services management: opportunities for information system scholars. Information Systems Research 17(4), 327-331.
72. RAINER RK, TURBAN E and POTTER RE (2007) Introduction to Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
73. RALPH P and WAND Y (2007) An ontology of design concepts. Working Paper Presented at the Theory Development Workshop of the Journal of the Association of Information Systems. Montreal, Canada, 12 December 2007.
74. RAMILLER N (2002) Animating the concept of business process in the core course in information systems. Journal of Informatics Education and Research 3(2), 53-71 viewed on 1 September 2008 at [WWW document] http://iaim.aisnet.org/jier/V3N2/.
75. SCHRAGE M (2005) IT's hardest puzzle. C/O Magazine, (blog) 9 August. Viewed on 1 February 2008 at [WWW document] http://www.cio.com.au/index.php/id;1031171136.
76. SHERER SA and ALTER S (2004) Information system risks and risk factors: are they mostly about information systems? Communications of the Association for Information Systems 14(2), 29-64.
77. SIAU K, SHENG H and NAH FF-H (2004) The value of mobile commerce to customers. Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, Washington, DC, pp 65-69.
78. SUMNER M and RYAN T (1994) The impact of CASE: can it achieve critical success factors? Journal of Systems Management 6(45), 16-21.
79. SYMONS VJ (1991) Impacts of information systems: four perspectives. Information and Software Technology 33(3), 181-190.
80. TADEUSZ L and RYBNIK J (1992) Rough sets and some aspects of logic synthesis. In Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory (SLOWINSKI R, Ed), pp 181-201, Kluwer, Dordracht, Netherlands.
81. TECHWEB (2008) Information System. In TechEncyclopedia, viewed on 1 February 2008. [WWW document] http://www.techweb.com/encyclopedia/defineterm.jhtml?term = information+system.
82. TRIST E (1981) The evolution of socio-technical systems: a conceptual framework and an action research program. In Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior (VAN dE VEN and JOYCE W, Eds), Wiley Interscience, NY.
83. UNITED KINGDOM ACADEMY FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS (UKAIS) (1997) Newsletter of the UKAIS. 3, cited by Monarch IA "Information Science and Information Systems: Converging or Diverging?" Viewed on 1 September 2008 at [WWW document] http://www.cais-acsi.ca/proceedings/2000/monarch-2000.pdf.
84. WAND Y and WEBER R (1990) Toward a theory of the deep structure of information systems. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Information Systems (DEGROSS J, ALAVI M and OPPELLAND H, Eds), pp 61-71, Copenhagen, Denmark.
85. WAND Y and WEBER R (2002) Research commentary: information systems and conceptual modeling - a research Agenda. Information Systems Research 13(4), 363-376.
86. WATSON RT Ed (2008) Information Systems, Release 6, Global Text Project, viewed on 1 September 2008 at [WWW document] http://homepage.mac.com/rickwatson/filechute/IS%20bookE1R6.pdf.