Usage of online knowledge repositories: A comparison of two governance mechanisms

18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Kayhan, Varol ^a   Bhattacherjee, Anol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Information technology adoption; IS innovation; Knowledge management; Knowledge based systems

Indexed keywords

DATA COLLECTION; FIELD EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; IS INNOVATIONS; KNOWLEDGE ASSETS; KNOWLEDGE REPOSITORY; KNOWLEDGE WORKERS; ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; USAGE PATTERNS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84870649690     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a Tpb Questionnaire. Retrieved June 19th, 2009, from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf.
2. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D.E. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 107-136.
4. Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. (2002). Social Capital and Community Governance. The Economic Journal, 112), 419-436.
5. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (5), 752-766.
6. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L., and Strong, B. (2008). Business Insight (a Special Report): Organization; Putting Ideas to Work: Knowledge Management Can Make a Difference - but It Needs to Be More Pragmatic, in: Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition), R.11.
7. Dijkstra, J.J. (1995). The Influence of an Expert System on the User's View: How to Fool a Lawyer. New Review of Applied Expert Systems, 1), 123-138.
8. Dijkstra, J.J. (1999). User Agreement with Incorrect Expert System Advice. Behavior & Information Technology, 18 (6), 399-411.
9. Dijkstra, J.J., Liebrand, W.B.G., and Timminga, E. (1998). Persuasiveness of Expert Systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 17 (3), 155-163.
10. Fadel, K.J., Durcikova, A., and Cha, H.S. (2008). Elaboration Likelihood in Knowledge Management: A Model and Experimental Test. The 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 359-368, Hawaii.
11. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
12. Gawronski, B., and Bodenhausen, G.V. (2006). Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation: An Integrative Review of Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (5), 692-731.
13. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. (1999). What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77 (2), 106-116.
14. Holzner, B., and Marx, J.H. (1979). Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society. Allyn-Bacon, Boston.
15. Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2 (1), 88-115.
16. Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.
17. Kooiman, J., and Bavinck, M. (2005). The Governance Perspective. in: Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. J. Kooiman, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin and M. Bavinck (eds.), Amsterdam University Press, 11-24.
18. Mak, B., Schmitt, B.H., and Lyytinen, K. (1997). User Participation in Knowledge Update of Expert Systems. Information & Management Science, 32 (2), 55-63.
19. Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5 (1), 14-37.
20. Pentland, B.T. (1995). Information Systems and Organizational Learning: The Social Epistemology of Organizational Knowledge Systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 5 (1), 1-21.
21. Petty, R.E., and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer-Verlag, New York.
22. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., and Schumann, D. (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. The Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (2), 135-146.
23. Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34 (2), 243-281.
24. Slater, M.D., and Rouner, D. (1996). How Message Evaluation and Source Attributes May Influence Credibility Assessment and Belief Change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73 (4), 974-991.
25. Sloman, S.A. (1996). The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (1), 3-22.
26. Smith, E.R., and DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4), 108-131.
27. Streeck, W., and Schmitter, P.C. (1985). Community, Market, State-and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order. European Sociological Review, 1 (2), 119-138.
28. Sussman, S.W., and Siegal, W.S. (2003). Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption. Information Systems Research, 14 (1), 47-65.
29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
30. Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (3), 341-352.
31. Zhang, W., and Watts, S.A. (2008). Capitalizing on Content: Information Adoption in Two Online Communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9 (2), 73-94.