Biofilm formation on composite resins for dental restorations: An in situ study on the effect of chlorhexidine mouthrinses

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 792-799

  Brambilla, Eugenio ^a   Ionescu, Andrei ^a   Gagliani, Massimo ^a   Cochis, Andrea ^b   Arciola, Carla Renata ^b   Rimondini, Lia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biofilm; Caries; Chlorhexidine; Composites; Dental plaque; Silorane

Indexed keywords

BIOFILMS; DENTAL COMPOSITES; ENAMELS; FILLING; FREE ENERGY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

BIOFILM FORMATION; CARIES; CHLORHEXIDINE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PLAQUES; DENTAL RESTORATIONS; DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; IN-SITU STUDY; ORAL BACTERIA; SILORANES;

RESINS;

3 (4,5 DIMETHYL 2 THIAZOLYL) 2,5 DIPHENYLTETRAZOLIUM BROMIDE; CHLORHEXIDINE; COSWELL; CURASEPT; METHACRYLATE BASED COMPOSITE RESIN; MOUTHWASH; PLACEBO; RESIN; SILORANE BASED COMPOSITE RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; CELL ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SPLINT;

EID: 84870573019     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000165     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ferracane JL. Resin composite - state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29-38.
2. Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ, Blum IR, Wilson NH. State-of-the-art techniques in operative dentistry: contemporary teaching of posterior composites in UK and Irish dental schools. Br Dent J. 2010;209(3):129-136.
3. Lee JH, Um CM, Lee IB. Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in monomer and filler composition. Dent Mater. 2006;22(6):515-526.
4. Jandt KD, Sigusch BW. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):1001-1006.
5. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(3):165-179.
6. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775-783.
7. Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Gagliani M, Fadini L, Garcia-Godoy F, Strohmenger L. Influence of different adhesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization. Am J Dent. 2005;18(3):173-176.
8. Sbordone L, Bortolaia C. Oral microbial biofilms and plaquerelated diseases: microbial communities and their role in the shift from oral health to disease. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7(4):181-188.
9. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4457-4463.
10. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(6): 793-798.
11. Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24(6):732-736.
12. Singh J, Khalichi P, Cvitkovitch DG, Santerre JP. Composite resin degradation products from BisGMA monomer modulate the expression of genes associated with biofilm formation and other virulence factors in Streptococcus mutans. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;88(2):551-560.
13. Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative. Dent Mater. 2009;25(2):269-275.
14. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Schroeder M, Balducci I, Versluis A, Ballester RY. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2004;32(6):459-470.
15. Rosin M, Urban AD, Gätner C, Bernhardt O, Splieth C, Meyer G. Polymerization shrinkage-strain and microleakage in dentin-bordered cavities of chemically and light-cured estorative materials. Dent Mater. 2002;18(7):521-528.
16. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Byerley TJ, Chappelow CC. Adhesives and nonshrinking dental resins of the future. Quintessence Int. 1993;24(9):632-640.
17. Duarte S Jr, Botta AC, Phark JH, Sadan A. Selected mechanical and physical properties and clinical application of a new low-shrinkage composite restoration. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(8):631-638.
18. Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21(1):68-74.
19. Ilie N, Hickel R. Silorane-based dental composite: behavior and abilities. Dent Mater. 2006;25:445-454.
20. Lien W, Vandewalle KS. Physical properties of a new siloranebased restorative system. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4):337-344.
21. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, James A, et al. Two year clinical evaluation of a low-shrink resin composite material in UK general dental practices. Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):622-630.
22. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Rosti F, Scribante A, Saino E, Visai L. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to different restorative materials. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32(9):671-677.
23. Auschill TM, Hein N, Hellwig E, Follo M, Sculean A, Arweiler NB. Effect of two antimicrobial agents on early in situ biofilm formation. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):147-152.
24. Van Strydonck DA, Timmerman MF, van der Velden U, van der Weijden GA. Plaque inhibition of two commercially available chlorhexidine mouthrinses. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(3): 305-309.
25. Adams D, Addy M. Mouthrinses. Adv Dent Res. 1994;8(2): 291-301.
26. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13(4):258-269.
27. Ström G, Fredriksson M, Stenius P. Contact angles, work of adhesion, and interfacial tensions at a dissolving hydrocarbon surface. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1987;119(2):352-361.
28. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent. 1998;26(4):311-317.
29. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Bell TJ, et al. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices. Quintessence Int. 2001;32(4):293-298.
30. Arciola CR, Montanaro L, Costerton JW. New trends in diagnosis and control strategies for implant infections. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34(9):727-736.
31. Aslam S, Darouiche RO. Role of antibiofilm-antimicrobial agents in controlling device-related infections. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34(9):752-758.
32. Visai L, De Nardo L, Punta C, et al. Titanium oxide antibacterial surfaces in biomedical devices. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34(9):929-946.
33. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Speziale P, Montanaro L, Costerton JW. Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilmresistant materials. Biomaterials. 2012;33(26):5967-5982.
34. Sousa RP, Zanin IC, Lima JP, et al. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation. J Dent. 2009;37(1):44-51.
35. Heintze SD, Twetman S. Interdental mutans streptococci suppression in vivo: a comparison of different chlorhexidine regimens in relation to restorative material. Am J Dent. 2002;15(2):103-108.
36. Konishi N, Torii Y, Kurosaki A, Takatsuka T, Itota T, Yoshiyama M. Confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis of early plaque formed on resin composite and human enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(8):790-795.
37. Busscher HJ, Doornbusch GI, Van der Mei HC. Adhesion of mutants streptococci to glass with and without a salivary coating as studied in a parallel-plate flow chamber. J Dent Res. 1992;71(3):491-500.
38. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22(1):1-14.
39. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res. 2010;89(7):657-665.
40. Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Hoffman MP, Wakefield JS. A multi-station dental plaque microcosm (artificial mouth) for the study of plaque growth, metabolism, pH, and mineralization. J Dent Res. 1991;70(11):1409-1416.
41. Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity-a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(2):123-139.
42. Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effects of resin composite components on glucosyltransferase of cariogenic bacterium. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;51(1):123-127.
43. Khalichi P, Cvitkovitch DG, Santerre JP. Effect of composite resin biodegradation products on oral streptococcal growth. Biomaterials. 2004;25(24):5467-5472.