Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to different restorative materials

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 671-677

  Poggio, Claudio ^a   Arciola, Carla R ^b,c   Rosti, Federico ^a   Scribante, Andrea ^a   Saino, Enrica ^a,d   Visai, Livia ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d Center for Tissue Engineering CIT   (Italy)

Author keywords

Composite resins; GICs; Microorganism adhesion; Restorative materials; Silorane composite; Streptococcus mutans

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BACTERIA; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DENTAL MATERIALS; FLUORINE COMPOUNDS; GLASS; IONOMERS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; FILTEK SUPREME; FLOWABLE COMPOSITE; GLASS-IONOMERS; MICRO-ORGANISM ADHESIONS; PACKABLE COMPOSITES; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; SILORANE COMPOSITE; SILORANES; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS;

SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER; NANOCOMPOSITE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; COLONY FORMING UNIT; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ELECTRICITY; NONHUMAN; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 70549084721     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039139880903200917     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Busscher HJ, Bos R, van der Mei HC. Initial microbial adhesion is a determinant for the strength of biofilm adhesion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1995; 128: 229-34.
2. Quiryney M, Bollen CML. The influence of surface roughness and surface free-energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22: 1-14.
3. Rolland SL, McCabe JF, Robinson C, Walls AWG. In vitro biofilm formation on the surface of resin-based dentine adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114: 243-9.
4. Costerton JW, Montanaro L, Arciola CR. Biofilm in implant infections: its production and regulation. Int J Artif Organs 2005; 28:1062-8.
5. Kawai K, Urano M. Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 396-400.
6. Quirynen M, van der Mei HC, Bollen CML, Schottle A, Marechal M, Doornbusch GI, Naert I, Bussecher HJ, van Steenberghe D. An in vivo study to the influence of surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingival plaque. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1304-9.
7. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Arends J, Darius PL, van Steenberghe D. The influence of surface free-energy on planimeteric plaque growth in man. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 796-9.
8. Satou J, Fukunaga A, Satou N, Shintani H, Okada K. Streptococcal adherence on various restorative materials. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 588-91.
9. Olsonn J, van der Heijde Y, Holmberg K. Plaque formation in vivo and bacterial attachment in vitro on permanently hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Caries Res 1992; 26: 428-33.
10. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 915-23.
11. Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, Matin K Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 613-22.
12. Milosevic A. The influence of surface finish and in-vitro pellicle on contact-angle measurement and surface morphology of three commercially available composite restorative. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 85-97.
13. Leonardt A, Olsson J, Dahlèn G. Bacterial colonisation on titanium, hydroxyapatite, and amalgam surfaces in vivo. J Dent Res 1995; 73: 1615-26.
14. Zalkind MM, Keisar O, Ever-Hadani P, Grinberg R, Sela MN. Accumulation of Streptococcus mutans on light-cured composites and amalgam: an in vitro study. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 187-90.
15. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, Donati ME, Breschi L, Prati C, Arciola CR. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 4457-63.
16. Kinniment SL, Wimpenny JWT, Adams D, Marsh PD. Development of a steady-state oral microbial community using the constant depth film fermenter. Microbiology (UK) 1996; 142: 631-8.
17. Carléan A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 481-7.
18. Shahal Y, Steinberg D, Hirschfeld Z, Bronshteyn M, Kopolovic K. In vitro bacterial adherence onto pellicle-coated aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 52-8
19. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Bürgers R, Handel G. Surface properties and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental resin polymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:2619-27.
20. Hahn R, Weiger R, Netuschil L, Brüch M. Microbial accumulation and vitality on different restorative materials. Dent Mater J 1993; 9: 313-6.
21. Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hanel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 296-275.
22. Rosentritt M, Hahnel S, Gröger G, Mühlfriedel B, Bürgers R, Handel G. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to various dental materials in a laminar flow chamber system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 86: 36-44.
23. Randall RC, Wilson NH. Glass ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 628-37.
24. Brambilla E, Cagetti MG, Gagliani M, Fadini L, Garcìa-Godoy F, Strohmenger L. Influence of different adesive restorative materials on mutans streptococci colonization. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 173-6.
25. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 48-53.
26. Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 278-85.