Two systems for automatic music genre recognition: What are they really recognizing?

MIRUM 2012 - Proceedings of the 2nd International ACM Workshop on Music Information Retrieval with User-Centered and Multimodal Strategies, Co-located with ACM Multimedia 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 69-74

  Sturm, Bob L ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Classification performance; Music genre recognition

Indexed keywords

AUDIO SIGNAL; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; MEAN CLASSIFICATION; MUSIC GENRE; STATE-OF-THE-ART SYSTEM;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84870572075     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2390848.2390866     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. C. Ammer. Dictionary of Music. The Facts on File, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 4 edition, 2004.
2. J.-J. Aucouturier, B. Defreville, and F. Pachet. The bag of frames approach to audio pattern recognition: A sufficient model for urban soundscapes but not for polyphonic music. J. Acoust. Soc. America, 122(2):881-891, Aug. 2007.
3. D. Benbouzid, R. Busa-Fekete, N. Casagrande, F.-D. Collin, and B. Kégl. Multiboost: a multi-purpose boosting package. J. Machine Learning Res., 13:549-553, Mar. 2012.
4. J. Bergstra, N. Casagrande, D. Erhan, D. Eck, and B. Kégl. Aggregate features and AdaBoost for music classification. Machine Learning, 65(2-3):473-484, June 2006.
5. S. S. Chen, D. L. Donoho, and M. A. Saunders. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20(1):33-61, Aug. 1998.
6. Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Computer System Sci., 55:119-139, 1997.
7. G. Marques, M. Lopes, M. Sordo, T. Langlois, and F. Gouyon. Additional evidence that common low-level features of individual audio frames are not representative of music genres. In Proc. Sound and Music Comp., Barcelona, Spain, July 2010.
8. C. McKay and I. Fujinaga. Music genre classification: Is it worth pursuing and how can it be improved? In Proc. Int. Soc. Music Info. Retrieval, Victoria, Canada, Oct. 2006.
9. A. Niculescu-Mizil and R. Caruana. Obtaining calibrated probabilities from boosting. In Int. Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intell., pages 413-420, 2005.
10. Y. Panagakis, C. Kotropoulos, and G. R. Arce. Music genre classification via sparse representations of auditory temporal modulations. In Proc. European Signal Process. Conf., Glasgow, Scotland, Aug. 2009.
11. R. Schapire and Y. Singer. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. Machine Learning, 37(3):297-336, 1999.
12. P. Shapiro. Turn the Beat Around: The Secret History of Disco. Faber & Faber, London, U.K., 2005.
13. M. Slaney. Auditory toolbox. Technical report, Interval Research Corporation, 1998.
14. B. L. Sturm. An analysis of the GTZAN music genre dataset. In Proc. ACM Workshop on Music Information Retrieval with User-Centered and Multimodal Strategies, Nara, Japan, Nov. 2012.
15. B. L. Sturm and P. Noorzad. On automatic music genre recognition by sparse representation classification using auditory temporal modulations. In Proc. Int. Symp. Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval, London, U.K., June 2012.
16. G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook. Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process., 10(5):293-302, July 2002.
17. E. van den Berg and M. P. Friedlander. Probing the Pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions. SIAM J. on Scientific Computing, 31(2):890-912, Nov. 2008.
18. J. Wright, A. Y. Yang, A. Ganesh, S. S. Sastry, and Y. Ma. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 31(2):210-227, Feb. 2009.