On the value of drovers' routes as environmental assets: A contingent valuation approach

Land Use Policy

Volumn 32, Issue , 2013, Pages 78-88

  del Saz Salazar, Salvador ^a   Guaita Pradas, Inmaculada ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Drovers' routes; Protest and zero responses; Sample selection bias; Spike model

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; MODELING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

COMUNIDAD VALENCIA; SPAIN;

EID: 84870508607     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Ajzen I., Brown T.C., Carvajal F. Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:1108-1121.
2. Almansa C., Calatrava J., Martínez-Paz J.M. Extending the framework of the economic valuation of erosion control actions in Mediterranean basins. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:294-308.
3. Almansa-Sáez C., Calatrava-Requena J. Reconciling sustainability and discounting in cost-benefit analysis: A methodological proposal. Ecological Economics 2007, 60:712-725.
4. Alvarez-Farizo B., Hanley N. Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: combining citizens' juries with choice modelling. Land Economics 2006, 82:465-478.
5. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R., Schuman H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Federal Register 1993, 58:4601-4614.
6. Ayer M., Brunk H.D., Ewing G.M., Silverman E. An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1955, 26:641-647.
7. Barr R.F., Mourato S. Investigating the potential for marine resource protection through environmental service markets: An exploratory study from La Paz, Mexico. Ocean and Coastal Magement 2009, 52:568-577.
8. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual 2002, Edward Elgar Ltd., Cheltenham.
9. Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Georgiou S., Lake I. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Economics 2006, 60:450-460.
10. Bengochea-Morancho A., Fuertes-Eugenio A.M., Saz-Salazar S., del A comparison of empirical models used to infer the willingness to pay in contingent valuation. Empirical Economics 2005, 30:235-244.
11. Bishop R.C., Heberlein T.A. Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1979, 61:926-930.
12. Bockstael N.E., McConnell K.E., Strand I. Recreation. Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality 1991, North Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam. J.B. Braden, C.D. Kolstad (Eds.).
13. Broberg T., Brännlund R. On the value of large predators in Sweden: A regional stratified contingent valuation analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88:1066-1077.
14. Buckley C., van Rensburg T.M., Hynes S. Recreational demand for farm commonage in Ireland: A contingent valuation assessment. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:846-854.
15. Calia P., Strazzera E. A sample selection model for protest votes in contingent valuation analysis. Statistica 2001, 61:473-485.
16. Carson R.T. Constructed markets. Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality 1991, North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam. J.B. Braden, C.D. Kolstad (Eds.).
17. Carson R.T. Contingent valuation: theoretical advances and empirical tests since the NOAA panel. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1997, 79:1501-1507.
18. Carson R.T. Contingent valuation: a user's guide. Environmental Science and Technology 2000, 34:1413-1418.
19. Carson R.T., Mitchell R.C., Hanemann M., Kopp R.J., Presser S., Ruud P.A. Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental and Resource Economics 2003, 25:257-286.
20. Christie M. An assessment of the economic effectiveness of recreation policy using contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1999, 42:547-564.
21. Clinch J.P., Murphy A. Modelling winners and losers in contingent valuation of public goods: appropriate welfare measures and econometric analysis. The Economic Journal 2001, 111:420-443.
22. Cole D.N. Minimizing conflict between recreation and nature conservation. Ecology of Greenways: Design and Function of Linear Conservation Areas 1993, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. D.S. Smith, P.C. Hellmund (Eds.).
23. Collins J.P., Vossler C. Incentive compatibility tests of choice experiment value elicitation questions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 58:226-235.
24. Cooper J.C. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1993, 24:25-40.
25. Daubert J.T., Young R.A. Recreational demands for maintaining instream flows: A contingent valuation approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1981, 63:666-684.
26. Dziegielewska D.A., Mendelshon R. Does " No" mean " No" ?. A protest methodology. Environmental and Resource Economics 2007, 38:71-87.
27. European Commission Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/cost/guide2008_en.pdf.
28. Gómez Sal, A., Lorente, I., 2004. The present status and ecological consequences of transhumance in Spain. In: Bunce, R.G.H., Pérez Soba, M., Jongman, R.H.G., Gómez Sal, A., Herzog, F., Austad, I. (Eds.), Transhumance and Biodiversity. European Mountains. Report from the EU-FP5 project Transhumount (EVK2-CT-2002-80017). Alterra, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, pp. 233-248 (IALE publication series no. 1).
29. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2012, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. seventh ed.
30. Haab T.C. Nonparticipation or Misspecification? The Impacts of Nonparticipation on Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 1999, 14:443-461.
31. Hanemann W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994, 8:19-43.
32. Hanemann M., Kriström B. Preference uncertainty, optimal designs and spikes. Current Issues in Environmental Economics 1995, Manchester University Press, Manchester. P.-O. Johansson, B. Kriström, K.-G. Mäller (Eds.).
33. Hanley N., Alvarez-Farizo B., Shaw W.D. Rationing an open-access resource: mountaineering in Scotland. Land Use Policy 2002, 19:167-176.
34. Hanley N., Barbier E.B. Pricing Nature. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy 2009, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
35. Hanley N., Colombo S., Kriström B., Watson F. Accounting for negative, zero and positive willingness to pay for landscape change in a national park. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2009, 60:1-16.
36. Hanley N., Kriström N., Shogren J.F. Coherent Arbitrariness: On Value Uncertainty for Environmental Goods. Land Economics 2009, 85:41-50.
37. Hanley N., Saw W.D., Wright R.E. The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation 2003, Edward Elgar, USA.
38. Hanley N., Schläpfer F., Spurgeon J. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. Journal of Environmental Management 2003, 68:297-304.
39. Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979, 47:153-161.
40. Howley P., Doherty E., Buckley C., Hynes S., Van Rensburg T., Green S. Exploring preferences towards the provision of farmland walking trails: A supply and demand perspective. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:111-118.
41. Johnson B.K., Whitehead J.C. Value of public goods from sports stadiums: the CVM approach. Contemporary Economic Policy 2000, 18:48-58.
42. Jorgensen B.S., Syme G.J. Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement. Ecological Economics 2000, 33:251-265.
43. Kriström B. Spike models in contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1997, 79:1013-1023.
44. Kriström B. A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete-response contingent valuation studies. Land Economics 1990, 66:135-139.
45. Lee L.F., Maddala G.S., Trost R.P. Asymptotic covariance matrices of two-stages probit and two-stages tobit methods for simultaneous equations models with selectivity. Econometrica 1980, 48:491-503.
46. Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K., Covich A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 2000, 33:103-117.
47. Loomis J.B., Keske C.M. Mountain substitutability and peak load pricing of high alpine peaks as a management tool to reduce environmental damage: A contingent valuation study. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1751-1760.
48. Loureiro M.L., McCluskey J.J., Mitrelhammer R.C. Are Stated Preferences Good Predictors of Market Behavior?. Land Economics 2003, 79:44-55.
49. Madureira L., Nunes L.C., Borges J.G., Falcão A.O. Assessing forest management strategies using a contingent valuation approach and advanced visualisation techniques: A Portuguese case study. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17:399-414.
50. Maguire K.B. Does mode matter?. a comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:3528-3533.
51. Manzano-Baena P., Casas R. Past, present and future of Trashumancia in Spain: nomadism in a developed country. Pastoralism 2010, 1:73-90.
52. Manzano P., Malo J.E. Extreme long-distance seed dispersal via sheep. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2006, 4:244-248.
53. McConnell K.E. The economics of outdoor recreation. Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics 1985, vol. 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
54. Meyerhoff J., Liebe U. Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: explaining their motivation. Ecological Economics 2006, 57:583-594.
55. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1989, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
56. Múgica M., De Lucio J.V., Pineda F.D. The Madrid ecological network. Perspectives on Ecological Networks 1996, 49-59. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg. P. Nowicki, G. Bennett, D. Middleton, S. Rientjes, Wolters (Eds.).
57. Murphy J.J., Stevens T.H., Yadav L. A comparison of induced value and home-grown value experiments to test for hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 47:111-123.
58. Nahuelhual-Muñoz L., Loureiro M., Loomis J. Addressing Heterogeneous Preferences Using Parametric Extended Spike Models. Environmental and Resource Economics 2004, 27:297-311.
59. Pate J., Loomis J. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecological Economics 1997, 20:199-207.
60. Pearce D.W., Groom B., Hepburn C., Koundouri P. Valuing the future: recent advances in social discounting. World Economics 2003, 4:121-139.
61. Pickering C.M., Newsome H.W., Leung Y.F. Comparing hiking, mountain biking and horse riding impacts on vegetation and soils in Australia and the United States of America. Journal of Environmental Management 2010, 91:551-562.
62. Poe G.L., Vossler C.A. Consequentiality and contingent values: an emerging paradigm. The International Handbook on Non-market Environmental Valuation 2011, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. J. Bennett (Ed.).
63. Discounting and Intergenerational Equity 1999, Resources for the Future, Washington. P.R. Portney, J.P. Weyant (Eds.).
64. Powe N.A., Bateman I.J. Investigating insensitivity to scope: a split-sample test of perceived scheme realism. Land Economics 2004, 80:258-271.
65. Reiser B., Schechter M. Incorporating Zero Values in the Economic Valuation of Environmental Program Profits. Environmetrics 1999, 10:87-101.
66. Rodriguez D. La transhumancia: cultura, cañadas y viajes 2004, Edilesa, León, España.
67. Ruiz M., Ruiz J.P. Ecological history of transhumance in Spain. Biological Conservation 1986, 37:73-86.
68. Santagata W., Signorello G. Contingent valuation of a cultural public good and policy design: the case of 'Napoli Musei Aperti'. Journal of Cultural Economics 2000, 24:181-204.
69. Saz-Salazar S.del, García-Menéndez L. The nonmarket benefits of redeveloping dockland areas for recreational purposes: the case of Castellón, Spain. Environment and Planning A 2003, 35:2115-2129.
70. Saz-Salazar S.del, García-Menéndez L. Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter?. Land Use Policy 2007, 24:296-305.
71. Saz-Salazar S.del, Rausell-Köster P. A Double-Hurdle model of urban green areas valuation: dealing with zero responses. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 84:241-251.
72. Schläpfer F. Contingent valuation: a new approach. Ecological Economics 2008, 64:729-740.
73. Svedsäter H. Economic valuation of the environment: How citizens make sense of contingent valuation questions. Land Economics 2003, 79:122-135.
74. Strazzera E., Genius M., Scarpa R., Hutchinson G. The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Environmental and Resource Economics 2003, 25:461-476.
75. UNFPA State of World Population 2010 2010, United Nations Population Fund.
76. Van de Ven W., Van Praag B. The demand of deductibles in private health insurance. A probit model with sample selection. Journal of Econometrics 1981, 17:229-252.
77. Vossler C., Evans M.F. Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentiality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2009, 58:338-345.
78. Weitzman M. Just keep discounting, but.... Discounting and Intergenerational Equity 1999, Resources for the Future, Washington. P.R. Portney, J.P. Weyant (Eds.).
79. Whitehead J.C., Blomquist G.C. The use of contingent valuation in benefit-cost analysis. Handbook of Contingent Valuation 2006, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. A. Alberini, J.R. Kahn (Eds.).
80. Yoo S.-H., Kwak S.J. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: A contingent valuation study. Energy Policy 2009, 37:5408-5416.