Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation

Ecological Economics

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 583-594

  Meyerhoff, Jürgen ^a   Liebe, Ulf ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Forest biodiversity; Protest responses; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 33747627161     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 179-211
2. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann W.M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E., Pearce D., Sugden R., and Swanson J. Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques. A Manual (2002), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 458 pp.
3. Blamey R.K. Contingent valuation and the activation of environmental norms. Ecological Economics 24 (1998) 47-72
4. Boyle K.J. Contingent valuation in practice. In: Champ P.A., Boyle K.J., and Brown T.C. (Eds). A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht 111-169
5. Boyle K.J., and Bergstrom J.C. Doubt, doubt, and doubters: the genesis of a new research agenda?. In: Bateman I.J., and Willis K.G. (Eds). Valuing Environmental Preferences. Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford 183-206
6. Carson R.T., Flores N.E., and Meade N.F. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (2001) 173-210
7. Diekmann A., and Preisendörfer P. Umweltbewuβtsein und Umweltverhalten in Low-und High-Cost-Situationen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 27 (1998) 438-453
8. Diekmann A., and Preisendörfer P. Green and greenback. The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society 15 (2003) 441-472
9. Franzen A. Trittbrettfahren oder Engagement? Überlegungen zum Zusammenhang zwischen Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten. In: Diekmann A., and Franzen A. (Eds). Kooperatives Umwelthandeln: Modelle, Erfahrungen, Maβnahmen (1995), Rüegger, Zürich 133-150
10. Freeman III A.M. Economic valuation: what and why?. In: Champ P.A., Boyle K.J., and Brown T.C. (Eds). A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht 1-25
11. Halstead J.M., Luloff A.E., and Stevens T.H. Protest bidders in contingent valuation. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21 (1992) 160-169
12. Hardin R. Collective action as an agreeable n-prisoners' dilemma. Behavioural Science 16 (1971) 472-481
13. Horton B., Colarullo G., Bateman I.J., and Peres C. Evaluating non-user willingness to pay for a large-scale conservation programme in Amazonia: a UK/Italian contingent valuation study. Environmental Conservation 30 (2003) 139-146
14. Jakobsson K.M., and Dragun A.K. The worth of a possum: valuing species with the contingent valuation method. Environmental and Resource Economics 19 (2001) 211-227
15. Jones A.M. Health econometrics. In: Culyer A.J., and Newhouse J.P. (Eds). Handbook of Health Economics (2000), Elsevier, Amsterdam 265-344
16. Jorgensen B.S., and Syme G.J. Protest response and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement. Ecological Economics 33 (2000) 251-265
17. Jorgensen B.S., Wilson M.A., and Heberlein T.A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope. Ecological Economics 36 (2001) 133-148
18. Kahneman D., and Knetsch J.L. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (1992) 57-70
19. Kotchen M.J., and Reiling S.D. Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics 32 (2000) 93-107
20. Lindsey G. Market models, protest bids, and outliers in contingent valuation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 120 (1994) 121-129
21. Mitchell R.C., and Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (1989), Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. 463 pp.
22. Morrison M.D., Blamey R.K., and Bennett J.W. Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies. Environmental and Resource Economics 16 (2000) 407-422
23. Nunes P.A.L.D., and Schokkaert E. Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2003) 231-245
24. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action (1965), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 186 pp.
25. Söderquist T. Why give up money for the Baltic Sea?. Environmental and Resource Economics 12 (1998) 249-254
26. Spash C.L. Ethics and environment attitudes with implications for economic valuation. Environmental Management 50 (1997) 403-416
27. Strazzera E., Genius M., Scarpa R., and Hutchinson W.G. The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Environmental and Resource Economics 25 (2003) 461-476
28. Sugden R. Public goods and contingent valuation. In: Bateman I.J., and Willis K.G. (Eds). Valuing Environmental Preferences. Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries (1999), Oxford University Press 131-151
29. Wronka T.C. Protestantworten- theoretischer Hintergrund, empirischer Befund und Lösungsstrategien. In: Elsasser P., and Meyerhoff J. (Eds). Ökonomische Bewertung von Umweltgütern. Anwendung der Kontingenten Bewertung im deutschsprachigen Raum (2001), Metropolis, Marburg 161-183
30. Wronka T.C. Ökonomische Umweltbewertung. Vergleichende Analyse und neuere Entwicklungen der kontingenten Bewertung am Beispiel der Artenvielfalt und Trinkwasserqualität (2004), Vauk KG, Kiel (298 pp.)