Contingent valuation: A user's guide

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1413-1418

  Carson, Richard T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; HICKSIAN CONSUMER SURPLUS MEASURES; PASSIVE USE CONSIDERATIONS; STATUS QUO POLICY; SURVEY BASED METHOD; WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ESTIMATION; MARKETING; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS; VALUE ENGINEERING;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHODOLOGY;

ARTICLE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENT; MARKETING; POLICY;

EID: 0034655321     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es990728j     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Just, R.; Hueth, D.; Schmidt, A. Applied Welfare Economics; Prentice-Hall: New York, 1982.
2. Freeman, A. M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 1993.
3. Cummings, R. G.; Brookshire, D. S.; Schulze, W. D. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method; Rowman and Allenheld: Totowa, NJ, 1986.
4. Mitchell, R. C.; Carson, R. T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method; Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 1989.
5. Portney, P. J. Econ. Perspect. 1994, 8 (4), 3.
6. Hanemann, W. M. J. Econ. Perspect. 1994, 8 (4), 19.
7. Diamond P.; Hausman, J. J. Econ. Perspect. 1994, 8 (4), 45.
8. Cameron, T. A. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1988, 15, 355.
9. Hanemann, W. M.; Kanninen, B. The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response; In Valuing the Environment Preferences; Bateman, I., Willis, K., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999.
10. Willig, R. D. Am. Econ. Rev. 1976, 66, 589.
11. Hanemann, W. M. Am. Econ. Rev. 1991, 81, 635.
12. Carson, R. T.; et al. A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Papers and Studies; NRDA: La Jolla, CA, 1995.
13. Carson, R. T.; et al. A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill; Report to State of Alaska, November 1992.
14. Carson, R. T.; Flores, N. E.; Mitchell, R. C. Theory and Measurement of Passive-Use Value; In Valuing the Environment Preferences; Bateman, I., Willis, K., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999.
15. Randall, A. Resour. Energy Econ. 1998, 20, 197.
16. Krutilla, J. Am. Econ. Rev. 1967, 57, 777.
17. Farrow, S.; Larson, D. M. AERE Newslett. 1993, May, 12.
18. Rosenthal, R. H.; Nelson, D. H. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 1992, 11, 116.
19. Quiggan, J. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 1993, 12, 195.
20. Kopp, R. J. Policy. Anal. Manage. 1992, 11, 123.
21. Cropper, M.; et al. J. Policy. Econ. 1992, 100, 175.
22. Arrow, K. et al. Fed. Regist. 1993, 58, 4601.
23. Kahneman, D.; Knetsch, J. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1992, 22, 57.
24. Carson, R. T.; Mitchell, R. C. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1995, 28, 155.
25. Boyle, K.; et al. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1994, 27, 64.
26. Smith; V. K.; Osborne, L. L. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1996, 31, 287.
27. Carson, R. T. Contingent Valuation and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope. In Determining the Value of Non-Marketed Goods: Economic, Psychological, and Policy Relevant Aspects of Contingent Valuation Methods; Kopp, R., Pommerhene, W., Schwartz, N., Eds; Kluwer: Amsterdame, 1997.
28. Chilton, S. M.; Hutchinson, W. G. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1999, 37, 202.
29. Carson, R. T.; Flores, N.; Hanemann, W. M. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1998, 36, 314.
30. Boyle; et al. Land Econ. 1996, 72, 381.
31. Hoehn, J.; Randall, A. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1987, 14, 226.
32. Hanemann, W. M. Contingent Valuation and Economics. In Environmental Valuation New Perspectives; Willis, K. G., Corkindale, J. T., Eds.; CAB International: Oxford, UK, 1995.
33. Carson, R. T.; et al. Land Econ. 1996, 72, 80.
34. Cummings, R. et al. Am. Econ. Rev. 1995, 35, 260.
35. Asher, H. Polling the Public, 4th ed.; Congressional Quarterly Press: Washington, DC, 1998.
36. Cronin, T. E. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1989.
37. Blackburn, M.; Harrison, G. W.; Rutstrom, E. E. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1994, 76, 1084.
38. Cameron, T. A. Land Econ. 1992, 68, 302.
39. Adamowicz, W.; et al. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1994, 26, 27.
40. Loomis, J. Water Resour. Res. 1992, 28, 701.
41. Bjornstad, D., Kahn, J., Eds. The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources: Methodological Issues and Research Needs; Edward Elgar: Brookfield, VT, 1996.
42. Bateman, I., Willis, K., Eds. Valuing the Environment Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing Countries; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1959.
43. Hausman, J., Ed. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1993.
44. Mitchell, R. C.; Carson, R. T. Current Issues in the Design, Administration, and Analysis of Contingent Valuation Surveys. In Current Issues in Environmental Economics; Johansson, P. O., Kristrom, B., Maler, K. G., Eds.; Manchester University Press: Manchester, U.K., 1995.
45. Chilton, S. G.; Hutchinson, W. G. J. Econ. Psychol. 1999, 20, 465.
46. Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed.; Prentice-Hall: New York, 2000.
47. Kristrom, B. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1997, 79, 1013.
48. Haab, T. C.; McConnell, K. E. Land Econ. 1998, 74, 216.
49. Beattie J.; et al. J. Risk Uncertainty 1998, 17, 5.
50. Kramer, R. A.; Mercer, D. E. Land Econ. 1997, 73, 196.
51. Adamowicz, W. L.; et al. Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. In Valuing the Environment Preferences; Bateman, I., Willis, K., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.
52. Louviere, J. J. Conjoint Analysis. In Advanced Methods in Marketing Research; Bagozzi, R., Ed.; Blackwell: Oxford, 1994.