Stakeholders' perceptions on developing sustainable Red Sanders (Pterocarpus santalinus L.) wood trade in Andhra Pradesh, India

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 26, Issue , 2013, Pages 43-53

  Kukrety, Sidhanand ^a   Dwivedi, Puneet ^b   Jose, Shibu ^c   Alavalapati, Janaki R R ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Yale School of the Environment   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Andhra Pradesh Forest Department; CITES; Endangered; Endemic; Sustainable wood trade; SWOT AHP

Indexed keywords

CITES; ENDANGERED; ENDEMIC; FOREST DEPARTMENT; SWOT-AHP; WOOD TRADE;

CONSERVATION; CROPS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SANDERS;

WOOD;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FARM CROPS; FOREIGN TRADE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; INDIA; WOOD;

PTEROCARPUS; PTEROCARPUS SANTALINUS;

EID: 84870502304     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abensperg-Traun M. CITES, sustainable use of wild species and incentive-driven conservation in developing countries, with an emphasis on southern Africa. Biological Conservation 2009, 142:948-963.
2. Aczel J., Saaty T.L. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1983, 27:93-102.
3. APAD Andhra Pradesh Agriculture Department. General information-Land Holdings Retrieved April 27, 2011, from. http://agri.ap.nic.in/land_holdings.htm.
4. APFD Facts and figures 2009. Andhra Pradesh Forest Department, Hyderabad, India Retrieved April 20, 2011, from. http://forest.ap.nic.in/Facts%20and%20Figures/facts_and_figures-2009.pdf.
5. APFD Joint forest management in Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Pradesh Forest Department, Hyderabad, India Retrieved April 27, 2011, from. http://forest.ap.nic.in/JFM%20CFM/JFMINAP.htm.
6. Brander J.A., Taylor M.S. International trade between consumer and conservationist countries. Resource and Energy Economics 1997, 19:267-298.
7. Brugha R., Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning 2000, 15:239-246.
8. Chevalier J.M., Buckles D. Conflict management: a heterocultural perspective, cultivating peace. Cultivating Peace: Conflict and Collaboration in Natural Resource Management 1999, 13-44. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa. D. Buckles (Ed.).
9. Forman E., Peniwati K. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 1998, 108:165-169.
10. GOI Government of India, Red Sanders Retrieved on July 19, 2011, from. http://moef.nic.in/downloads/public-information/Chap-8-new.pdf.
11. Grimble R., Chan M.K. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries: some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Natural Resources Forum 1995, 19:113-124.
12. Grimble R., Wellard K. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 1997, 55:173-193.
13. IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature-Red list of threatened species Retrieved April 20, 2011, from. http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/32104/0.
14. Kajanus M., Kangas J., Kurttila M. The use of value focused thinking and the A'WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tourism Management 2004, 25:499-506.
15. Kala A.P. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Annual Report, 2005-06. Government of India Retrieved April 20, 2011. http://www.dri.nic.in/DRI/ANNUAL_REPORT_2005-06.pdf.
16. Kangas A. An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning. Forest Ecology and Management 1994, 70:75-88.
17. Krott M. Forest Policy Analysis 2005, Springer Publication, Dordrecht-The Netherlands.
18. Kukrety, S., 2011. Restoration of Red Sanders (Pterocarpus Santalinus L.) forests for ecological and economic benefits. University of Florida, Gainesville. PhD thesis.
19. Kurtilla M., Pesonen M., Kangas J., Kajanus M. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest certification case. Forest Policy and Economics 2000, 1:41-52.
20. Manjunatha B.K. Antibacterial activities of Pterocarpus santalinus. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2006, 68:115-116.
21. Masozera M.K., Alavalapati J.R.R., Jacobson S., Shrestha R.K. Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe Forest Reserve. Rwanda Forest Policy and Economics 2006, 8:206-216.
22. Mollenhorst H., de Boer I.J.M. Identifying sustainability issues using participatory SWOT analysis: a case study of egg production in the Netherlands. Outlook on Agriculture 2004, 33:267-276.
23. Mulliken T., Crofton P. Review of the Status, Harvest, Trade and Management of Seven Asian CITES-listed medicinal and aromatic plant species Retrieved March 25, 2010, from. http://www.cites.org/common/com/PC/17/X-PC17-Inf-10.pdf.
24. Narayan S., Devi R.S., Devi C.S. Role of Pterocarpus santalinus against mitochondrial dysfunction and membrane lipid changes induced by ulcerogens in rat gastric mucosa. Chemico-Biological Interactions 2007, 170:67-75.
25. NMDT National Multi-Disciplinary Team-Minutes of the first meeting, New Delhi, India Retrieved April 27, 2011, from. http://sudiv.gov.in/PDFFiles/WhatsNew/NewInc/MinuteDRI.pdf.
26. Pesonen M., Kurttila M., Kangas J., Kajanus M., Heinonen P. Assessing the priorities using A'WOT among resource management strategies at the Finnish Forest and Park Service. Forest Science 2001, 47:534-541.
27. Ramakrishna A. The Red sanders and its future. Indian Forester 1962, 3:202-205.
28. Rao K.B., Giri R., Kesavulu M.M., Apparao C. Effect of oral administration of bark extracts of Pterocarpus santalinus on blood glucose level in experimental animals. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2001, 74:69-74.
29. Reddy C.V.K. Red sanders and its history of utilization. Indian Forester 1972, 589-593.
30. Reddy Y.S. Working Plan for the Management of Forests of Rajampet division 2009, Andhra Pradesh Forest Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, India.
31. Rivalan P., Delmas V., Angulo E., Bull L.S., Hall R.J., Courchamp F., Rosser A.M., Leader-Williams N. Can bans stimulate wildlife trade?. Nature 2007, 447:529-530.
32. Saaty T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1977, 15:234-281.
33. Saaty T.L. The seven pillars of the analytical hierarchy process. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of Analytical Hierarchy Process 2001, 27-46. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Netherlands. T.L. Saaty, L.G. Vargas (Eds.).
34. Shrestha R.K., Alavalapati J.R.R., Kalmbacher R.S. Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agricultural Systems 2004, 81:185-199.
35. Swanson T., Bolton P., Manning A. Regulating endangered species. Economic Policy 1993, 8:183-205.
36. Weihrich H. The TWOS matrix-a tool for situation analysis. Long Range Planning 1982, 15:54-66.