Copy-number-aware differential analysis of quantitative DNA sequencing data

Genome Research

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2490-2496

  Robinson, Mark D ^a,b   Strbenac, Dario ^b   Stirzaker, Clare ^b,e   Statham, Aaron L ^b   Song, Jenny ^b   Speed, Terence P ^c,d   Clark, Susan J ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b GARVAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^c WALTER AND ELIZA HALL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFINITY BASED COPY NUMBER AWARE DIFFERENTIAL QUANTITATIVE DNA SEQUENCING ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA METHYLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE LOCUS; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY;

DNA;

ALGORITHMS; DNA; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DNA METHYLATION; GENETIC LOCI; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84870495795     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.139055.112     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anders S, Huber W. 2010. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11: R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106.
2. Bardet AF, He Q, Zeitlinger J, Stark A. 2011. A computational pipeline for comparative ChIP-seq analyses. Nat Protoc 7: 45-61.
3. Baudis M, Cleary ML. 2001. Progenetix.net: An online repository for molecular cytogenetic aberration data. Bioinformatics 17: 1228-1229. (Pubitemid 33735351)
4. Bernstein BE, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Costello JF, Ren B, Milosavljevic A, Meissner A, Kellis M, Marra MA, Beaudet AL, Ecker JR, et al. 2010. The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nat Biotechnol 28: 1045-1048.
5. Bock C, Tomazou EM, Brinkman AB, Müller F, Simmer F, Gu H, Jäger N, Gnirke A, Stunnenberg HG, Meissner A. 2010. Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies. Nat Biotechnol 28: 1106-1114.
6. Cheung M-S, Down TA, Latorre I, Ahringer J. 2011. Systematic bias in high-throughput sequencing data and its correction by BEADS. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 1-9.
7. Curtis C, Lynch AG, Dunning MJ, Spiteri I, Marioni JC, Hadfield J, Chin S-F, Brenton JD, Tavaré S, Caldas C. 2009. The pitfalls of platform comparison: DNA copy number array technologies assessed. BMC Genomics 10: 588. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-588.
8. Down TA, Rakyan VK, Turner DJ, Flicek P, Li H, Kulesha E, Gräf S, Johnson N, Herrero J, Tomazou EM, et al. 2008. A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nat Biotechnol 26: 779-785. (Pubitemid 351961453)
9. Egelhofer TA, Minoda A, Klugman S, Lee K, Kolasinska-Zwierz P, Alekseyenko AA, Cheung M-S, Day DS, Gadel S, Gorchakov AA, et al. 2011. An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 91-93.
10. Feber A, Wilson GA, Zhang L, Presneau N, Idowu B, Down TA, Rakyan VK, Noon LA, Lloyd AC, Stupka E, et al. 2011. Comparative methylome analysis of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Genome Res 21: 515-524.
11. Greenman CD, Bignell G, Butler A, Edkins S, Hinton J, Beare D, Swamy S, Santarius T, Chen L, Widaa S, et al. 2010. PICNIC: An algorithm to predict absolute allelic copy number variation with microarray cancer data. Biostatistics 11: 164-175.
12. Hansen KD, Irizarry RA, Wu Z. 2012. Removing technical variability in RNA-seq data using conditional quantile normalization. Biostatistics 13: 204-216.
13. Hawkins RD, Hon GC, Lee LK, Ngo Q, Lister R, Pelizzola M, Edsall LE, Kuan S, Luu Y, Klugman S, et al. 2010. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6: 479-491.
14. Houseman EA, Christensen BC, Karagas MR, Wrensch MR, Nelson HH, Wiemels JL, Zheng S, Wiencke JK, Kelsey KT, Marsit CJ. 2009. Copy number variation has little impact on bead-array-based measures of DNA methylation. Bioinformatics 25: 1999-2005.
15. International Cancer Genome Consortium. 2010. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature 464: 993-998.
16. Jones PA, Baylin SB. 2007. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell 128: 683-692. (Pubitemid 46273572)
17. Jones PA, Archer T, Baylin SB, Beck S, Berger S, Bernstein BE, Carpten J, Clark S, Costello J, Doerge R, et al. 2008. Moving AHEAD with an international human epigenome project. Nature 454: 711-715.
18. Kim JH, Dhanasekaran SM, Prensner JR, Cao X, Robinson D, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Huang C, Shankar S, Jing X, Iyer M, et al. 2011. Deep sequencing reveals distinct patterns of DNA methylation in prostate cancer. Genome Res 21: 1028-1041.
19. Liang K, Keles S. 2011. Detecting differential binding of transcription factors with ChIP-seq. Bioinformatics 28: 1-2.
20. McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. 2012. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 1-10.
21. Rashid N, Giresi PG, Ibrahim JG, Sun W, Lieb JD. 2011. ZINBA integrates local covariates with DNA-seq data to identify broad and narrow regions of enrichment, even within amplified genomic regions. Genome Biol 12: R67. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-7-r67.
22. Robinson MD, Oshlack A. 2010. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 11: R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25.
23. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010a. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139-140.
24. Robinson MD, Statham AL, Speed TP, Clark SJ. 2010b. Protocol matters: Which methylome are you actually studying? Epigenomics 2: 587-598.
25. Robinson MD, Stirzaker C, Statham AL, Coolen MW, Song JZ, Nair SS, Strbenac D, Speed TP, Clark SJ. 2010c. Evaluation of affinity-based genome-wide DNA methylation data: Effects of CpG density, amplification bias, and copy number variation. Genome Res 20: 1719-1729.
26. Ross-Innes CS, Stark R, Teschendorff AE, Holmes KA, Ali HR, Dunning MJ, Brown GD, Gojis O, Ellis IO, Green AR, et al. 2012. Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature 481: 389-393.
27. Ruike Y, Imanaka Y, Sato F, Shimizu K, Tsujimoto G. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of aberrant methylation in human breast cancer cells using methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing. BMC Genomics 11: 137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-137.
28. Song Q, Smith AD. 2011. Identifying dispersed epigenomic domains from ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 27: 870-871.
29. Statham AL, Strbenac D, Coolen MW, Stirzaker C, Clark SJ, Robinson MD. 2010. Repitools: An R package for the analysis of enrichment-based epigenomic data. Bioinformatics 26: 1662-1663.
30. Statham AL, Robinson MD, Song JZ, Coolen MW, Stirzaker C, Clark SJ. 2012. Bisulphite-sequencing of chromatin immunoprecipitated DNA (BisChIP-seq) directly informs methylation status of histone-modified DNA. Genome Res 13: 22: 1120-1127.
31. Stratton MR. 2011. Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: Progress and promise. Science 331: 1553-1558.
32. Venkatraman ES, Olshen AB. 2007. A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23: 657-663. (Pubitemid 46554715)
33. Xu H, Wei C-L, Lin F, Sung W-K. 2008. An HMM approach to genome-wide identification of differential histone modification sites from ChIP-seq data. Bioinformatics 24: 2344-2349.
34. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer C, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, et al. 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9: R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137.
35. Zhou Y-H, Xia K, Wright F. 2011. A powerful and flexible approach to the analysis of RNA sequence count data. Bioinformatics 27: 2672-2678.