Life cycle analysis of grinding: A case study of non-cylindrical computer numerical control grinding via a unit-process life cycle inventory approach

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture

Volumn 226, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1604-1611

  Murray, Vance R ^a   Zhao, Fu ^a   Sutherland, John W ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

carbon footprint; computer numerical control grinding; knee implants; life cycle analysis; Sustainable manufacturing

Indexed keywords

COBALT-CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL; ENGINEERING QUALITY; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; KNEE IMPLANTS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY; LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY DATABASE; LIFE-CYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; NON-CYLINDRICAL; PARAMETERIZED; PROCESS MODEL; SURFACE GRINDING; SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING;

CARBON FOOTPRINT; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COBALT; COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; GRINDING (MACHINING); INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; MANUFACTURE;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 84870455181     PISSN: 09544054     EISSN: 20412975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954405412454102     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2009. 2011 ;:
2. Jovane F, Yoshikawa H, Alting L, et al. The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Ann - Mfg Technol. 2008 ; 57 (2). 641-659
3. Westkämper E. Life cycle management and assessment: approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing (keynote paper). CIRP Ann - Mfg Technol. 2000 ; 49 (2). 501-526
4. Grinding machinery: a global strategic business report. San Jose, CA: ; 2010
5. Ramani K, Ramanujan D, Bernstein W, et al. Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a review. J Mech Des. 2010 ; 132 (9). 091004
6. Overcash M, Twomey J, Kalla D. Unit process life cycle inventory for product manufacturing operations. ASME 2009 international manufacturing science and engineering conference ; West Lafayette, Indiana ;. 49.
7. Currant MA. Life cycle assessment: principles and practice. 2006
8. Morrow WR, Qi H, Kim I, et al. Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing. J Cleaner Prod. 2007 ; 15 (10). 932-943
9. Zhao F, Naik G, Cheng G. Environmental assessment of laser-assisted manufacturing: case studies on laser shock peening and laser assisted turning. J Cleaner Prod. 2010 ; 18 (13). 1311-1319
10. Badger J. Cooling in grinding-environmental considerations of quantity, disposal, and energy consumption. Proceedings of the 7th CIRP conference on sustainable manufacturing ; Chennei, India ;..
11. Baniszawski B An environmental impact analysis of grinding. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ; 2005
12. Oliveira JFG. Industrial challenges in grinding. CIRP Ann - Mfg Technol. 2009 ; 58 (2). 663-680
13. Howes TD, Tönshoff HK, Heuer W, et al. Environmental aspects of grinding fluids. CIRP Ann - Mfg Technol. 1991 ; 40 (2). 623-630
14. Alves S. Development of new cutting fluid for grinding process adjusting mechanical performance and environmental impact. J Mater Process Technol. 2006 ; 179 (1-3). 185-189
15. Geneva, Switzerland: Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework ; 2006
16. Marinescu I, Hitchiner M, Uhlmann E, et al Handbook of machining with grinding wheels. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis ; 2007: 93-100.
17. Production technology. Bangalore, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Education ; 2001
18. Bawaneh K, Overcash M, Twomey J. Climate zones and the influence on industrial nonprocess energy consumption. J Renew Sust Energy. 2011 ; 3 (6). 063113
19. Ali SH Ecological comparison of synthetic versus mined diamonds. University of Vermont: Institute for Environmental Diplomacy and Security ; 2011
20. Sutherland JW, Kulur VN, King NC. An experimental investigation of air quality in wet and dry turning. Ann CIRP. 2000 ; 49 (1). 61-64
21. Simpson AT, Stear M, Groves JA, et al. Occupational exposure to metalworking fluid mist and sump fluid contaminants. Ann Occupational Hygiene. 2003 ; 47 (1). 17-30
22. Parthasarathy A, Malkin S. Effect of fluid application conditions on grinding behaviour. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture. 2010 ; 224 (2). 225-235
23. Webster JA. Improving surface integrity and economics of grinding by optimum coolant application, with consideration of abrasive tool and process regime. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture. 2007 ; 221 (12). 1665-1675
24. Sanchez JA, Pombo I, Alberdi R, et al. Machining evaluation of a hybrid MQL-CO2 grinding technology. J Cleaner Prod. 2010 ; 18 (18). 1840-1849