When big data leads to lost data

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-8

  Megler, V M ^a   Maier, David ^a  

^a Portland State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Ranked data search; Scientific data

Indexed keywords

BIG DATUM; DATA SEARCHES; DATA SETS; DATA VOLUME; ENVIRONMENTAL SENSOR; EXPONENTIAL GROWTH; HETEROGENEOUS DATASETS; OBSERVATIONAL DATA; OCEAN OBSERVATORIES; PETABYTES; QUERY TERMS; SCIENTIFIC DATA; TEXT DOCUMENT;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; METADATA; RESEARCH;

DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84870447531     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2389686.2389688     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Ageev, M. et al. 2011. Find it if you can: A game for modeling different types of web search success using interaction data. Proceedings of SIGIR (2011).
2. Agrawal, R. and Srikant, R. 2003. Searching with numbers. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 15, 4 (Aug. 2003), 855 - 870.
3. Al-Maskari, A. et al. 2007. The relationship between IR effectiveness measures and user satisfaction. Proc. of SIGIR (2007), 773-774. (Pubitemid 350165063)
4. Aula, A. et al. 2010. How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? Proc. of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), 35-44.
5. Cacheda, F. et al. 2005. A case study of distributed information retrieval architectures to index one terabyte of text. Information Processing & Management. 41, 5 (2005).
6. Center for Coastal Margin Observation & Prediction (CMOP): http://www.stccmop.org/Accessed: 2011-04-17.
7. Chaudhuri, S. et al. 2005. Integrating DB and IR technologies. CIDR'05. (2005), 1-12.
8. D'Ulizia, A. et al. 2009. Approximating Geographical Queries. Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 24, 6 (2009), 1109-1124.
9. Demartini, G. et al. 2010. Overview of the INEX 2009 entity ranking track. Focused Retrieval and Evaluation. (2010).
10. Fabrikant, S.I. et al. 2004. The distance-similarity metaphor in network-display spatializations. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 31, 4 (2004), 237-252. (Pubitemid 40678202)
11. Gartner Says Solving "Big Data" Challenge Involves More Than Just Managing Volumes of Data: 2011. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id= 1731916 Accessed: 2012-06-28.
12. Geospatial One Stop (GOS): http://gos2.geodata.gov/wps/portal/gos. Accessed: 2011-01-19.
13. Global Change Master Directory Web Site: http://gcmd.nasa.gov/. Accessed: 2011-01-19.
14. Goodchild, M.F. and Zhou, J. 2003. Finding geographic information: Collection-level metadata. GeoInformatica. 7, 2 (2003), 95-112. (Pubitemid 36726767)
15. Grossner, K.E. et al. 2008. Defining a digital earth system. Transactions in GIS. 12, 1 (2008), 145-160.
16. Hey, T. and Trefethen, A.E. 2003. The Data Deluge: An e- Science Perspective. Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality (eds F. Berman, G. Fox and T. Hey). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. 809-824.
17. Houle, M. et al. 2010. Can Shared-Neighbor Distances Defeat the Curse of Dimensionality? Scientific and Statistical Database Management (2010), 482-500.
18. Ilyas, I.F. et al. 2008. A survey of top-k query processing techniques in relational database systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 40, 4 (2008), 11.
19. Jansen, B.J. et al. 2000. Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management. 36, 2 (2000), 207-227. (Pubitemid 30550546)
20. Lakoff, G. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From. Basic Books.
21. Long, X. and Suel, T. 2003. Optimized query execution in large search engines with global page ordering. Proc. of the 29th VLDB Conference (2003), 129-140.
22. Maier, D. et al. 2012. Navigating Oceans of Data. Scientific and Statistical Database Management (2012), 1-19.
23. Manning, C.D. et al. 2008. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
24. Megler, V.M. and Maier, D. 2011. Finding Haystacks with Needles. Scientific and Statistical Database Management (2011), 55-72.
25. Montello, D.R. 1991. The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 11, 2 (1991), 101-122.
26. Pallickara, S.L. et al. 2010. Efficient metadata generation to enable interactive data discovery over large-scale scientific data collections. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (2010), 573-580.
27. Rajasekar, A. and Moore, R. 2010. Data and metadata collections for scientific applications. High-Performance Computing and Networking (2010), 72-80.
28. Salton, G. 1968. Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval. (1968).
29. Schurman, E. and Brutlag, J. 2009. The user and business impact of server delays, additional bytes, and HTTP chunking in web search. Proc. Velocity: Web Performance and Operations Conf. (2009).
30. Skupin, A. and Buttenfield, B.P. 1996. Spatial metaphors for visualizing very large data archives. Proceedings of GIS/LIS '96 (1996), 607-617.
31. Su, L.T. 1994. The relevance of recall and precision in user evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45, 3 (1994), 207-217.
32. Tomasic, A. and Garcia-Molina, H. 1993. Performance of inverted indices in shared-nothing distributed text document information retrieval systems. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems (1993), 8-17.
33. Tversky, A. and Gati, I. 1978. Studies of similarity. Cognition and Categorization. 1, (1978), 79-98.
34. Venetis, P. et al. 2011. Recovering semantics of tables on the web. Proc. of VLDB 37. 4, 9 (2011), 528-538.
35. Voorhees, E. and Tice, D.M. 1999. The TREC-8 question answering track evaluation. Text Retrieval Conference TREC (1999).
36. Wang, J. et al. 2010. Indexing multi-dimensional data in a cloud system. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '10), 591-602.