A survey of top-k query processing techniques in relational database systems

ACM Computing Surveys

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Ilyas, Ihab F ^a   Beskales, George ^a   Soliman, Mohamed A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Rank aggregation; Rank aware processing; Top k; Voting

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MARKUP LANGUAGES; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; QUERY PROCESSING; SURVEYS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CURRENT TECHNIQUES; DATA ACCESSES; DESIGN DIMENSIONS; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; DO-MAINS; INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS; MULTIMEDIA SEARCHES; PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; QUERY MODELS; QUERY PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; RANK AGGREGATION; RANK-AWARE PROCESSING; RELATIONAL DATABASES; SCORING FUNCTIONS; VOTING;

RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 55349093583     PISSN: 03600300     EISSN: 15577341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1391729.1391730     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Acharya, S., Gibbons, P. B., and Poosala, V. 2000. Congressional samples for approximate answering of group-by queries. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 487-498.
2. Amato, G., Rabitti, F., Savino, P., and Zezula, P. 2003. Region proximity in metric spaces and its use for approximate similarity search. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 21, 2, 192-227.
3. Amer-Yahia, S., Koudas, N., Marian, A., Srivastava, D., and Toman, D. 2005. Structure and content scoring for xml. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 361-372.
4. Aref, W. G., Catlin, A. C., Elmagarmid, A. K., Fan, J., Hammad, M. A., Ilyas, I. F., Marzouk, M., Prabhakar, S., and Zhu, X. 2004. VDBMS: A testbed facility for research in video database benchmarking. ACM Multimed. Syst. J. (Special Issue on Multimedia Document Management Systems) 9, 6, 575-585.
5. Arrow, K. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York, NY.
6. Babcock, B., Chaudhuri, S., and Das, G. 2003. Dynamic sample selection for approximate query processing. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 539-550.
7. Barbar, D., Garcia-Molina, H., and Porter, D. 1992. The management of probabilistic data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 4, 5, 487-502.
8. Black, D. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University Press, London, U.K.
9. Brzsnyi, S., Kossmann, D., and Stocker, K. 2001. The skyline operator. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Data Engineering. 421.
10. Brams, S. J. and Fishburn, P. C. 1983. Approval Voting. Birkhauser, Boston, MA.
11. Bruno, N., Chaudhuri, S., and Gravano, L. 2002a. Top-k selection queries over relational databases: Mapping strategies and performance evaluation. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 27, 2, 153-187.
12. Bruno, N., Gravano, L., and Marian, A. 2002b. Evaluating top-k queries over Web-accessible databases. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering. 369.
13. Chakrabarti, K., Garofalakis, M., Rastogi, R., and Shim, K. 2001. Approximate query processing using wavelets. VLDB J. 10, 2-3, 199-223.
14. Chang, K. C. and Hwang, S. 2002. Minimal probing: supporting expensive predicates for top-k queries. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 346-357.
15. Chang, Y., Bergman, L. D., Castelli, V., Li, C., Lo, M., and Smith, J. R. 2000. The Onion Technique: Indexing for linear optimization queries. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 391-402.
16. Chaudhuri, S., Das, G., Datar, M., Motwani, R., and Narasayya, V. R. 2001a. Overcoming limitations of sampling for aggregation queries. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Data Engineering. 534-542.
17. Chaudhuri, S., Das, G., and Narasayya, V. 2001b. A robust, optimization-based approach for approximate answering of aggregate queries. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 295-306.
18. Chaudhuri, S., Motwani, R., and Narasayya, V. 1998. Random sampling for histogram construction: How much is enough? In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 436-447.
19. Copeland, A. H. 1951. A reasonable social welfare function. Mimeo. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
20. Cranor, L. 1996. Declared-strategy voting: An instrument for group decision-making. Ph.D. dissertation. Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
21. Das, G., Gunopulos, D., Koudas, N., and Tsirogiannis, D. 2006. Answering top-k queries using views. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 451-462.
22. Diaconis, P. 1998. Group Representation in Probability and Statistics. Institute of Mathematical Statistics. Web site: www.imstat.org.
23. Diaconis, P. and Graham, R. 1977. Spearman's footrule as a measure of disarray. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B 39, 2, 262-268.
24. Donjerkovic, D. and Ramakrishnan, R. 1999. Probabilistic optimization of top N queries. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 411-422.
25. Dwork, C., Kumar, S. R., Naor, M., and Sivakumar, D. 2001. Rank aggregation methods for the Web. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. 613-622.
26. Fagin, R., Kumar, R., Mahdian, M., Sivakumar, D., and Vee, E. 2004. Comparing and aggregating rankings with ties. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. 47-58.
27. Fagin, R., Kumar, R., and Sivakumar, D. 2003. Comparing top k lists. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 28-36.
28. Fagin, R., Lotem, A., and Naor, M. 2001. Optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 1, 1, 614-656.
29. Fuhr, N. 1990. A probabilistic framework for vague queries and imprecise information in databases. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 696-707.
30. Ganti, V., Lee, M., and Ramakrishnan, R. 2000. ICICLES: Self-tuning samples for approximate query answering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 176-187.
31. Getoor, L. and Diehl, C. P. 2005. Link mining: A survey. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 7, 2, 3-12.
32. Gntzer, U., Balke, W., and Kieling, W. 2000. Optimizing multi-feature queries for image databases. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 419-428.
33. Gntzer, U., Balke, W., and Kieling, W. 2001. Towards efficient multi-feature queries in heterogeneous environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing. 622.
34. Guo, L., Shao, F., Botev, C., and Shanmugasundaram, J. 2003. XRANK: Ranked keyword search over XML documents. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 16-27.
35. Hellerstein, J. M., Haas, P. J., and Wang, H. J. 1997. Online aggregation. In Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 171-182.
36. Hoeffding, W. 1963. Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. American Statistical Association Journal, 13-30.
37. Hristidis, V., Koudas, N., and Papakonstantinou, Y. 2001. PREFER: A system for the efficient execution of multi-parametric ranked queries. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 259-270.
38. Hristidis, V. and Papakonstantinou, Y. 2004. Algorithms and applications for answering ranked queries using ranked views. VLDB J. 13, 1, 49-70.
39. Hwang, S. and Chang, K. C. 2007a. Optimizing top-k queries for middleware access: A unified cost-based approach. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 32, 1, 5.
40. Hwang, S. and Chang, K. C. 2007b. Probe minimization by schedule optimization: Supporting top-k queries with expensive predicates. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 19, 5, 646-662.
41. Ilyas, I. F., Aref, W. G., and Elmagarmid, A. K. 2002. Joining ranked inputs in practice. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 950-961.
42. Ilyas, I. F., Aref, W. G., and Elmagarmid, A. K. 2004a. Supporting top-k join queries in relational databases. VLDB J. 13, 3, 207-221.
43. Ilyas, I. F., Aref, W. G., Elmagarmid, A. K., Elmongui, H. G., Shah, R., and Vitter, J. S. 2006. Adaptive rank-aware query optimization in relational databases. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 31, 4, 1257-1304.
44. Ilyas, I. F., Shah, R., Aref, W. G., Vitter, J. S., and Elmagarmid, A. K. 2004b. Rank-aware query optimization. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 203-214.
45. Ilyas, F. I., Walid, G. A., and Elmagarmid, A. K. 2003. Supporting top-k join queries in relational databases. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Very Large Databases. 754-765.
46. Imielinski, T. and Lipski Jr., W. 1984. Incomplete information in relational databases. J. ACM 31, 4, 761-791.
47. Kendall, M. G. 1945. The treatment of ties in ranking problems. Biometrika 33, 3, 239-251.
48. Klamler, C. 2003. A comparison of the dodgson method and the copeland rule. Econ. Bull. 4, 8, 1-7.
49. Li, C., Chang, K. C., and Ilyas, I. F. 2006. Supporting ad-hoc ranking aggregates. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 61-72.
50. Li, C., Chang, K. C., Ilyas, I. F., and Song, S. 2005. RankSQL: Query algebra and optimization for relational top-k queries. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 131-142.
51. Mamoulis, N., Cheng, K. H., Yiu, M. L., and Cheung, D. W. 2006. Efficient aggregation of ranked inputs. In Proceedings of the 22rd International Conference on Data Engineering. 72.
52. Marian, A., Bruno, N., and Gravano, L. 2004. Evaluating top-k queries over Web-accessible databases. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 29, 2, 319-362.
53. Michel, S., Triantafillou, P., and Weikum, G. 2005. KLEE: A framework for distributed top-k query algorithms. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 637-648.
54. Natsev, A., Chang, Y., Smith, J. R., Li, C., and Vitter, J. S. 2001. Supporting incremental join queries on ranked inputs. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 281-290.
55. Nurmi, H. 1987. Comparing Voting Systems. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Germany.
56. R, C., Dalvi, N. N., and Suciu, D. 2007. Efficient top-k query evaluation on probabilistic data. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering. 886-895.
57. Robertson, S. E. and Walker, S. 1994. Some simple effective approximations to the 2-Poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 232-241.
58. Salton, G. and McGill, M. J. 1983. Introduction to Modern IR. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
59. Silberstein, A., Braynard, R., Ellis, C. S., Munagala, K., and Yang, J. 2006. A sampling-based approach to optimizing top-k queries in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering. 68.
60. Soliman, M. A., Ilyas, I. F., and Chang, K. C.-C. 2007. Top-k query processing in uncertain databases. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering. 896-905.
61. Theobald, M., Schenkel, R., and Weikum, G. 2005. An efficient and versatile query engine for TopX search. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 625-636.
62. Theobald, M., Weikum, G., and Schenkel, R. 2004. Top-k query evaluation with probabilistic guarantees. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 648-659.
63. Truchon, M. 1998. An extension of the Condorcet criterion and Kemeny orders. Cahier 98-15. Centre de Recherche en Economie et Finance Appliquees, Universit Laval, Qubec, Canada.
64. Tsaparas, P., Palpanas, T., Kotidis, Y., Koudas, N., and Srivastava, D. 2003. Ranked join indices. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Data Engineering. 277.
65. Vrbsky, S. V. and Liu, J. W. S. 1993. APPROXIMATEa query processor that produces monotonically improving approximate answers. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 5, 6, 1056-1068.
66. Xin, D., Chen, C., and Han, J. 2006. Towards robust indexing for ranked queries. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 235-246.
67. Xin, D., Han, J., and Chang, K. C. 2007. Progressive and selective merge: computing top-k with ad-hoc ranking functions. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 103-114.
68. Young, H. P. and Levenglick, A. 1978. A consistent extension of condorcet's election principle. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 35, 2, 285-300.
69. Yuan, Y., Lin, X., Liu, Q., Wang, W., Yu, J. X., and Zhang, Q. 2005. Efficient computation of the skyline cube. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 241-252.
70. Zhang, Z., Hwang, S., Chang, K. C., Wang, M., Lang, C. A., and Chang, Y. 2006. Boolean + ranking: Querying a database by k-constrained optimization. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 359-370.