Assessing hospital information systems processes: A validation of prise information systems success model in healthcare

14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2008

Volumn 6, Issue , 2008, Pages 3956-3967

  Ozkan, Sevgi ^a   Baykal, Nazife ^b   Sincan, Murat ^c  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Health care; Information system process maturity; Information systems effectiveness; Information systems evaluation; Information systems success; Information technology management

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHODS; HEALTHCARE SECTORS; HIGH QUALITY INFORMATION; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUCCESS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT; INTEGRAL FACTOR; IS ASSESSMENT; IT SYSTEM; LOW LEVEL; SYSTEM PROCESS;

HEALTH CARE; MEDICAL COMPUTING;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870274902     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Ammenwerth, E., et al., HIS-Monitor: An approach to assess the quality of information processing in hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2007. 76(2-3): p. 216-225.
2. Ammenwerth, E. and N. de Keizer, An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care - Trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods of Information in Medicine, 2005. 44(1): p. 44-56.
3. Borum, F. and J.K. Christiansen, Actors and structure in IS projects: What makes implementation happen? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2006. 22(3): p. 213-237.
4. Braa, K. and L. Ogrim, Critical-View of the Application of the Iso Standard for Quality Assurance. Information Systems Journal, 1995. 5(4): p. 253-269.
5. Chang, J.C.J. and W.R. King, Measuring the performance of information systems: A functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2005. 22(1): p. 85-115.
6. Chaudhry, B., et al., Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med, 2006. 144(10): p. 742-52.
7. DeLone, W.H. and E.R. McLean, The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003. 19(4): p. 9-30.
8. Donahue, K.T. and P. Vanostenberg, Joint Commission International accreditation: relationship to four models of evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care, 2000. 12(3): p. 243-246.
9. Eccles, R.G., The Performance-Measurement Manifesto. Harvard Business Review, 1991. 69(1): p. 131-137.
10. EFQM, The EFQM Excellence Award. 2006.
11. ISACA. COBIT:Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology [cited 2007 11.1.2007]; Available from: www.isaca.org/cobit/.
12. ISO-9126. The ISO 9126 Standard. [cited 08/13/2007]; Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_9126.
13. ISO-20000. ISO 20000 [cited 08/13/2007]; Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_20000.
14. Jayasuriya, R., Evaluating health information systems: an assessment of frameworks. Aust Health Rev, 1997. 20(3): p. 68-85.
15. Kaushal, R., K.N. Barker, and D.W. Bates, How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children's health care? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2001. 155(9): p. 1002-7.
16. de Keizer, N. and E. Ammenwerth, Trends in Evaluation Research 1982 - 2002: A Study on how the Quality of IT Evaluation Studies Develop. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2005. 116: p. 581-6.
17. Li, M.F. and L.R. Ye, Information technology and firm performance: Linking with environmental, strategic and managerial contexts. Information & Management, 1999. 35(1): p. 43-51.
18. Office_of_Government_Commerce, IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL), Office of Government Commerce.
19. Ozkan, S., Hackney, R., Bilgen, S., Process Based Information Systems for International Business Evaluation, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2007. 20(6).
20. Ozkan, S. All Together Now: Merging Information Technology Quality and Other Business Performance Management frameworks, Cutter IT Journal The Journal of Information Technology Management, 2005, Vol.18, No.3, pp. 16-20 March ISSN: 1522-7383
21. Ozkan, S. Information Systems Quality versus Software Quality: A Process Based Assessment Model within the context of Organisation in proceedings of the 9th Association of Information Management Conference, 2004, AIM2004.
22. Ozkan, S., Bilgen, S. Notes Towards IS Assessment: A Comparison of two Models within the Context of the Internet in proceedings of the IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2003, Vol.2, pp.1215-1219.
23. Perera, R., et al., Panning for gold: An evidence-based tool for assessment of performance indicators in primary health care. Health Policy, 2007. 80(2): p. 314-327.
24. Q-rec European Quality Labelling and Certification of Electronic Health Record systems (EHRs) [cited 08/13/2007]; Available from: http://www.eurorec.org/projects/qrec.cfm.
25. Schroeder, R.G., et al., Six Sigma: Definition and Underlying Theory. Journal of Operations Management. 2007, in Press, Corrected Proof.
26. Shortliffe, E.H. and J.J. Cimino, eds. Biomedical Informatics Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Third Edition ed. Health Informatics Series, ed. K.J. Hannah and M.J. Ball. 2006, Springer
27. Software Engineering Institute, C. CMMI: Capability Maturity Model Integrated. [cited 2007 11.1.2007]; Available from: www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/
28. Software_Quality_Institute_GU. SPICE Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. [cited 08/13/2007]; Available from: http://www.sqi.gu.edu.au/spice/.
29. Willcocks, L. and S. Lester, How Do Organizations Evaluate and Control Information-Systems Investments - Recent Uk Survey Evidence. Ifip Transactions a-Computer Science and Technology, 1993. 24: p. 15-39.